On Sat, 10 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +1000
David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 05:19:02PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > On Thu,  8 Sep 2022 11:49:20 +1000
> > David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> >   
> > > Put the pieces together to use the new style context based dispatch for
> > > the passt_in_pasta tests.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > +++ b/test/lib/setup
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > @@ -156,21 +147,18 @@ setup_passt_in_ns() {
> > >  	[ ${TRACE} -eq 1 ] && __opts="${__opts} --trace"
> > >  
> > >  	if [ ${VALGRIND} -eq 1 ]; then
> > > -		pane_run PASST "make clean"
> > > -		pane_status PASST
> > > -		pane_run PASST "make valgrind"
> > > -		pane_status PASST
> > > -		pane_run PASST "valgrind --max-stackframe=$((4 * 1024 * 1024)) --trace-children=yes --vgdb=no --error-exitcode=1 --suppressions=test/valgrind.supp ./passt -f ${__opts} -t 10001,10011,10021,10031 -u 10001,10011,10021,10031 -P passt.pid"
> > > +		context_run passt "make clean"
> > > +		context_run passt "make valgrind"
> > > +		context_run_bg passt "valgrind --max-stackframe=$((4 * 1024 * 1024)) --trace-children=yes --vgdb=no --error-exitcode=1 --suppressions=test/valgrind.supp ./passt -f ${__opts} -t 10001,10011,10021,10031 -u 10001,10011,10021,10031 -P passt.pid"
> > >  	else
> > > -		pane_run PASST "make clean"
> > > -		pane_status PASST
> > > -		pane_run PASST "make"
> > > -		pane_status PASST
> > > -		pane_run PASST "./passt -f ${__opts} -t 10001,10011,10021,10031 -u 10001,10011,10021,10031 -P passt.pid"
> > > +		context_run passt "make clean"
> > > +		context_run passt "make"
> > > +		context_run_bg passt "./passt -f ${__opts} -t 10001,10011,10021,10031 -u 10001,10011,10021,10031 -P passt.pid"
> > >  	fi
> > >  	sleep 5
> > >  
> > > -	pane_run GUEST './qrap 5 qemu-system-$(uname -m)'                  \
> > > +	GUEST_CID=94557  
> > 
> > While this seems to be perfectly valid: is it supposed to be random, or
> > a specific number for a reason I'm missing...?  
> 
> It's entirely arbitrary - I went with as close a visual approximation
> of 'passt' as I could manage with digits (which isn't very close at
> all).

Hah, sorry, of course. I would say it's actually the most acceptable
translation of passt in leetspeek:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet#Orthography

...never mind.

-- 
Stefano