From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] Improve types and names for port forwarding configuration
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2022 00:52:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220924005257.0c325e20@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220923045806.956143-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1067 bytes --]
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 14:57:59 +1000
David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> [...]
>
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/port_fwd.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: AGPL-3.0-or-later
> + * Copyright Red Hat
> + * Author: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio(a)redhat.com>
> + * Author: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef PORT_FWD_H
> +#define PORT_FWD_H
> +
> +enum port_fwd_mode {
> + FWD_SPEC = 1,
> + FWD_NONE,
> + FWD_AUTO,
> + FWD_ALL,
> +};
> +
> +typedef uint8_t port_fwd_map[DIV_ROUND_UP(USHRT_MAX, 8)];
Given that this gets conveniently embedded in a struct in 2/8, could we
avoid the typedef (or perhaps drop it after 2/8)? It makes the actual
type less obvious to figure out, and in general I agree with most
points from this slide deck:
http://www.kroah.com/linux/talks/ols_2002_kernel_codingstyle_talk/html/mgp00025.html
:) ...well, unless there's some resulting complexity I'm missing.
I reviewed the rest of the series, it all makes sense to me, thanks.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-23 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-23 4:57 [PATCH 0/8] Clean up and fix bugs in port forwarding data structures David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:57 ` [PATCH 1/8] Improve types and names for port forwarding configuration David Gibson
2022-09-23 22:52 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2022-09-24 2:57 ` David Gibson
2022-09-24 6:28 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-24 9:06 ` David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 2/8] Consolidate port forwarding configuration into a common structure David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 3/8] udp: Delay initialization of UDP reversed port mapping table David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 4/8] Don't use indirect remap functions for conf_ports() David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 5/8] Pass entire port forwarding configuration substructure to conf_ports() David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 6/8] Treat port numbers as unsigned David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 7/8] Fix widespread off-by-one error dealing with port numbers David Gibson
2022-09-23 4:58 ` [PATCH 8/8] icmp: Correct off by one errors dealing with number of echo request ids David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220924005257.0c325e20@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).