From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/28] cppcheck: Suppress same-value-in-ternary branches warning
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2022 22:58:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220928225806.101066a9@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220928043339.613538-21-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1191 bytes --]
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 14:33:31 +1000
David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> TIMER_INTERVAL is the minimum of two separately defined intervals which
> happen to have the same value at present. This results in an expression
> which has the same value in both branches of a ternary operator, which
> cppcheck warngs about. This is logically sound in this case, so suppress
> the error (we appear to already have a similar suppression for clang-tidy).
>
> Also add an unmatchedSuppression suppression, since only some cppcheck
> versions complain about this instance.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> passt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/passt.c b/passt.c
> index 4796c89..2c4a986 100644
> --- a/passt.c
> +++ b/passt.c
> @@ -305,6 +305,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>
> loop:
> /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(bugprone-branch-clone): intervals can be the same */
> + /* cppcheck-suppress [duplicateValueTernary, unmatchedSuppression] */
Somewhat surprisingly to me, NOLINTNEXTLINE means "next line of code",
not next line altogether -- given that this still works (I wouldn't
have even tried).
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-28 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-28 4:33 [PATCH 00/28] Fixes for static checkers David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 01/28] Clean up parsing of port ranges David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:57 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-29 1:04 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 02/28] clang-tidy: Suppress warning about unchecked error in logfn macro David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 03/28] clang-tidy: Fix spurious null pointer warning in pasta_start_ns() David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 04/28] clang-tidy: Remove duplicate #include from icmp.c David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 05/28] Catch failures when installing signal handlers David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 06/28] Pack DHCPv6 "on wire" structures David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 07/28] Clean up parsing in conf_runas() David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:57 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-29 1:44 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 08/28] cppcheck: Reduce scope of some variables David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 09/28] Don't shadow 'i' in conf_ports() David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 10/28] Don't shadow global function names David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 11/28] Stricter checking for nsholder.c David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 12/28] cppcheck: Work around false positive NULL pointer dereference error David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 13/28] cppcheck: Use inline suppression for ffsl() David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 14/28] cppcheck: Use inline suppressions for qrap.c David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 15/28] cppcheck: Use inline suppression for strtok() in conf.c David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 16/28] Avoid ugly 'end' members in netlink structures David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 17/28] cppcheck: Broaden suppression for unused struct members David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 18/28] cppcheck: Remove localtime suppression for pcap.c David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 19/28] qrap: Handle case of PATH environment variable being unset David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 20/28] cppcheck: Suppress same-value-in-ternary branches warning David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:58 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2022-09-29 1:00 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 21/28] cppcheck: Suppress NULL pointer warning in tcp_sock_consume() David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-29 1:07 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 22/28] Regenerate seccomp.h if seccomp.sh changes David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 23/28] cppcheck: Avoid errors due to zeroes in bitwise ORs David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 24/28] cppcheck: Remove unused knownConditionTrueFalse suppression David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-29 1:24 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 25/28] cppcheck: Remove unused objectIndex suppressions David Gibson
2022-09-28 20:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-09-29 1:12 ` David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 26/28] cppcheck: Remove unused va_list_usedBeforeStarted suppression David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 27/28] Mark unused functions for cppcheck David Gibson
2022-09-28 4:33 ` [PATCH 28/28] cppcheck: Remove unused unmatchedSuppression suppressions David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220928225806.101066a9@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).