From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/14] tap: Split tap_ip4_send() into UDP and ICMP variants
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 05:06:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221018050634.428cf8d6@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221017085807.473470-14-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 19:58:06 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> tap_ip4_send() has special case logic to compute the checksums for UDP
> and ICMP packets, which is a mild layering violation. By using a suitable
> helper we can split it into tap_udp4_send() and tap_icmp4_send() functions
> without greatly increasing the code size, this removing that layering
> violation.
>
> We make some small changes to the interface while there. In both cases
> we make the destination IPv4 address a parameter, which will be useful
> later. For the UDP variant we make it take just the UDP payload, and it
> will generate the UDP header. For the ICMP variant we pass in the ICMP
> header as before. The inconsistency is because that's what seems to be
> the more natural way to invoke the function in the callers in each case.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> icmp.c | 3 ++-
> tap.c | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> tap.h | 7 ++++--
> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/icmp.c b/icmp.c
> index 6493ea9..233acf9 100644
> --- a/icmp.c
> +++ b/icmp.c
> @@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ void icmp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> icmp_id_map[V4][id].seq = seq;
> }
>
> - tap_ip4_send(c, sr4->sin_addr.s_addr, IPPROTO_ICMP, buf, n);
> + tap_icmp4_send(c, sr4->sin_addr.s_addr, tap_ip4_daddr(c),
> + buf, n);
> }
> }
>
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index 274f4ba..5792880 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -127,20 +127,10 @@ static void *tap_l2_hdr(const struct ctx *c, void *buf, uint16_t proto)
> return eh + 1;
> }
>
> -/**
> - * tap_ip4_send() - Send IPv4 packet, with L2 headers, calculating L3/L4 checksums
> - * @c: Execution context
> - * @src: IPv4 source address
> - * @proto: L4 protocol number
> - * @in: Payload
> - * @len: L4 payload length
> - */
> -void tap_ip4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, uint8_t proto,
> - const char *in, size_t len)
I understand why you return ip(4)h + 1 here because I've just reviewed
9/14, I wouldn't know otherwise:
/**
* tap_ip4_hdr() - Build IPv4 header for inbound packet, with checksum
* @c: Execution context
* @src: IPv4 source address, network order
* @dst: IPv4 destination address, network order
* @len: L4 payload length
* @proto: L4 protocol number
*
* Return: pointer to write payload to
*/
> +static void *tap_ip4_hdr(char *buf, in_addr_t src, in_addr_t dst,
> + size_t len, uint8_t proto)
> {
> - char buf[USHRT_MAX];
> - struct iphdr *ip4h = (struct iphdr *)tap_l2_hdr(c, buf, ETH_P_IP);
> - char *data = (char *)(ip4h + 1);
> + struct iphdr *ip4h = (struct iphdr *)buf;
>
> ip4h->version = 4;
> ip4h->ihl = sizeof(struct iphdr) / 4;
> @@ -151,20 +141,61 @@ void tap_ip4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, uint8_t proto,
> ip4h->ttl = 255;
> ip4h->protocol = proto;
> ip4h->saddr = src;
> - ip4h->daddr = tap_ip4_daddr(c);
> + ip4h->daddr = dst;
> csum_ip4_header(ip4h);
> + return ip4h + 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * tap_udp4_send() - Send UDP over IPv4 packet
> + * @c: Execution context
> + * @src: IPv4 source address
> + * @sport: UDP source port
> + * @dst: IPv4 destination address
> + * @dport: UDP destination port
> + * @in: UDP payload contents (not including UDP header)
> + * @len: UDP payload length (not including UDP header)
> + */
> +/* cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction */
> +void tap_udp4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, in_port_t sport,
> + in_addr_t dst, in_port_t dport,
> + const void *in, size_t len)
> +{
> + size_t udplen = len + sizeof(struct udphdr);
> + char buf[USHRT_MAX];
> + void *ip4h = tap_l2_hdr(c, buf, ETH_P_IP);
> + void *uhp = tap_ip4_hdr(ip4h, src, dst, udplen, IPPROTO_UDP);
Two observations:
- this saves one line and one cast, but it's really a bit unnatural that
tap_ip4_hdr() doesn't point to the header it just made, or to nothing.
I would rather have to +1 the return value or the original pointer
instead or having this trick
> + struct udphdr *uh = (struct udphdr *)uhp;
> + char *data = (char *)(uh + 1);
- it's longer, but in my opinion clearer, if we split a bit more clearly
the components of the packet, that is, something like (untested):
char buf[USHRT_MAX];
struct udphdr *uh;
struct iphdr *iph;
char *data;
iph = (struct iphdr *)tap_l2_hdr(c, buf, ETH_P_IP) + 1;
tap_ip_hdr(iph, src, dst, len + sizeof(uh), IPPROTO_UDP);
uh = (struct udphdr *)iph + 1;
uh->source = htons(sport);
uh->dest = htons(dport);
uh->len = htons(len + sizeof(uh));
csum_udp4(uh, src, dst, in, len);
data = uh + 1;
memcpy(data, in, len);
if (tap_send(c, buf, len + (data - buf)) < 0)
debug("tap: failed to send %lu bytes (IPv4)", len);
>
> + uh->source = htons(sport);
> + uh->dest = htons(dport);
> + uh->len = htons(udplen);
> + csum_udp4(uh, src, dst, in, len);
> memcpy(data, in, len);
>
> - if (ip4h->protocol == IPPROTO_UDP) {
> - struct udphdr *uh = (struct udphdr *)(ip4h + 1);
> + if (tap_send(c, buf, len + (data - buf)) < 0)
> + debug("tap: failed to send %lu bytes (IPv4)", len);
> +}
>
> - csum_udp4(uh, ip4h->saddr, ip4h->daddr,
> - uh + 1, len - sizeof(*uh));
> - } else if (ip4h->protocol == IPPROTO_ICMP) {
> - struct icmphdr *ih = (struct icmphdr *)(ip4h + 1);
> - csum_icmp4(ih, ih + 1, len - sizeof(*ih));
> - }
> +/**
> + * tap_icmp4_send() - Send ICMPv4 packet
> + * @c: Execution context
> + * @src: IPv4 source address
> + * @dst: IPv4 destination address
> + * @in: ICMP packet, including ICMP header
> + * @len: ICMP packet length, including ICMP header
> + */
> +void tap_icmp4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, in_addr_t dst,
> + void *in, size_t len)
> +{
> + char buf[USHRT_MAX];
> + void *ip4h = tap_l2_hdr(c, buf, ETH_P_IP);
> + char *data = tap_ip4_hdr(ip4h, src, dst, len, IPPROTO_ICMP);
> + struct icmphdr *icmp4h = (struct icmphdr *)data;
...same here, even though perhaps not so apparent.
> +
> + memcpy(data, in, len);
> + csum_icmp4(icmp4h, icmp4h + 1, len - sizeof(*icmp4h));
>
> if (tap_send(c, buf, len + (data - buf)) < 0)
> debug("tap: failed to send %lu bytes (IPv4)", len);
> diff --git a/tap.h b/tap.h
> index d43c7a0..743bc58 100644
> --- a/tap.h
> +++ b/tap.h
> @@ -7,10 +7,13 @@
> #define TAP_H
>
> in_addr_t tap_ip4_daddr(const struct ctx *c);
> +void tap_udp4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, in_port_t sport,
> + in_addr_t dst, in_port_t dport,
> + const void *in, size_t len);
> +void tap_icmp4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, in_addr_t dst,
> + void *in, size_t len);
> const struct in6_addr *tap_ip6_daddr(const struct ctx *c,
> const struct in6_addr *src);
> -void tap_ip4_send(const struct ctx *c, in_addr_t src, uint8_t proto,
> - const char *in, size_t len);
> void tap_udp6_send(const struct ctx *c,
> const struct in6_addr *src, in_port_t sport,
> const struct in6_addr *dst, in_port_t dport,
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-18 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-17 8:57 [PATCH 00/14] Clean up checksum and header generation for inbound packets David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 01/14] Add csum_icmp6() helper for calculating ICMPv6 checksums David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:01 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:05 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 02/14] Add csum_icmp4() helper for calculating ICMPv4 checksums David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:01 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:06 ` David Gibson
2022-10-18 12:28 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 03/14] Add csum_udp6() helper for calculating UDP over IPv6 checksums David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:02 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:06 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 04/14] Add csum_udp4() helper for calculating UDP over IPv4 checksums David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:06 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 05/14] Add csum_ip4_header() helper to calculate IPv4 header checksums David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:07 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:57 ` [PATCH 06/14] Add helpers for normal inbound packet destination addresses David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:04 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:07 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 07/14] Remove support for TCP packets from tap_ip_send() David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 08/14] tap: Remove unhelpeful vnet_pre optimization from tap_send() David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:05 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:07 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 09/14] Split tap_ip_send() into IPv4 and IPv6 specific functions David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:06 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 12:07 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 10/14] tap: Split tap_ip6_send() into UDP and ICMP variants David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 11/14] ndp: Remove unneeded eh_source parameter David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 12/14] ndp: Use tap_icmp6_send() helper David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 13/14] tap: Split tap_ip4_send() into UDP and ICMP variants David Gibson
2022-10-18 3:06 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2022-10-18 12:07 ` David Gibson
2022-10-18 12:27 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-10-18 23:54 ` David Gibson
2022-10-17 8:58 ` [PATCH 14/14] dhcp: Use tap_udp4_send() helper in dhcp() David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221018050634.428cf8d6@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).