From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/32] tcp: Use the same sockets to listen for spliced and non-spliced connections
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 00:54:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221117005405.70227aba@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116044212.3876516-17-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Wed, 16 Nov 2022 15:41:56 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> In pasta mode, tcp_sock_init[46]() create separate sockets to listen for
> spliced connections (these are bound to localhost) and non-spliced
> connections (these are bound to the host address). This introduces a
> subtle behavioural difference between pasta and passt: by default, pasta
> will listen only on a single host address, whereas passt will listen on
> all addresses (0.0.0.0 or ::). This also prevents us using some additional
> optimizations that only work with the unspecified (0.0.0.0 or ::) address.
>
> However, it turns out we don't need to do this. We can splice a connection
> if and only if it originates from the loopback address. Currently we
> ensure this by having the "spliced" listening sockets listening only on
> loopback. Instead, defer the decision about whether to splice a connection
> until after accept(), by checking if the connection was made from the
> loopback address.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> tcp.c | 127 +++++++++++++--------------------------------------
> tcp_splice.c | 25 ++++++++--
> tcp_splice.h | 5 +-
> 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 102 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
> index e66a82a..4065da7 100644
> --- a/tcp.c
> +++ b/tcp.c
> @@ -434,7 +434,6 @@ static const char *tcp_flag_str[] __attribute((__unused__)) = {
> };
>
> /* Listening sockets, used for automatic port forwarding in pasta mode only */
> -static int tcp_sock_init_lo [NUM_PORTS][IP_VERSIONS];
> static int tcp_sock_init_ext [NUM_PORTS][IP_VERSIONS];
> static int tcp_sock_ns [NUM_PORTS][IP_VERSIONS];
>
> @@ -2851,21 +2850,31 @@ static void tcp_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> socklen_t sl;
> int s;
>
> + assert(ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.listen);
> + assert(!ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.splice);
> +
> if (c->tcp.conn_count >= TCP_MAX_CONNS)
> return;
>
> sl = sizeof(sa);
> + /* FIXME: Workaround clang-tidy not realizing that accept4()
> + * writes the socket address. See
> + * https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/58992
> + */
> + memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6));
> s = accept4(ref.r.s, (struct sockaddr *)&sa, &sl, SOCK_NONBLOCK);
Ah, interesting. That looks new by the way -- not even valgrind
complained about this.
> if (s < 0)
> return;
>
> conn = tc + c->tcp.conn_count++;
>
> - if (ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.splice)
> - tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(c, ref, &conn->splice, s);
> - else
> - tcp_tap_conn_from_sock(c, ref, &conn->tap, s,
> - (struct sockaddr *)&sa, now);
> + if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA &&
> + tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(c, ref, &conn->splice,
> + s, (struct sockaddr *)&sa))
> + return;
> +
> + tcp_tap_conn_from_sock(c, ref, &conn->tap, s,
> + (struct sockaddr *)&sa, now);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3018,47 +3027,16 @@ static void tcp_sock_init4(const struct ctx *c, const struct in_addr *addr,
> {
> in_port_t idx = port + c->tcp.fwd_in.delta[port];
> union tcp_epoll_ref tref = { .tcp.listen = 1, .tcp.index = idx };
> - bool spliced = false, tap = true;
> int s;
>
> - if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA) {
> - spliced = !addr || IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(addr) ||
> - IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(addr);
> -
> - if (!addr)
> - addr = &c->ip4.addr;
> -
> - tap = !IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(addr);
> - }
> -
> - if (tap) {
> - s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port,
> - tref.u32);
> - if (s >= 0)
> - tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> - else
> - s = -1;
> -
> - if (c->tcp.fwd_in.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> - tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V4] = s;
> - }
> -
> - if (spliced) {
> - struct in_addr loopback = { htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK) };
> - tref.tcp.splice = 1;
> -
> - addr = &loopback;
> -
> - s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port,
> - tref.u32);
> - if (s >= 0)
> - tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> - else
> - s = -1;
> + s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port, tref.u32);
> + if (s >= 0)
> + tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> + else
> + s = -1;
>
> - if (c->tcp.fwd_out.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> - tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V4] = s;
> - }
> + if (c->tcp.fwd_in.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> + tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V4] = s;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3075,47 +3053,16 @@ static void tcp_sock_init6(const struct ctx *c,
> in_port_t idx = port + c->tcp.fwd_in.delta[port];
> union tcp_epoll_ref tref = { .tcp.listen = 1, .tcp.v6 = 1,
> .tcp.index = idx };
> - bool spliced = false, tap = true;
> int s;
>
> - if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA) {
> - spliced = !addr ||
> - IN6_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(addr) ||
> - IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(addr);
> -
> - if (!addr)
> - addr = &c->ip6.addr;
> -
> - tap = !IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(addr);
> - }
> -
> - if (tap) {
> - s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET6, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port,
> - tref.u32);
> - if (s >= 0)
> - tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> - else
> - s = -1;
> -
> - if (c->tcp.fwd_in.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> - tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V6] = s;
> - }
> -
> - if (spliced) {
> - tref.tcp.splice = 1;
> -
> - addr = &in6addr_loopback;
> -
> - s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET6, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port,
> - tref.u32);
> - if (s >= 0)
> - tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> - else
> - s = -1;
> + s = sock_l4(c, AF_INET6, IPPROTO_TCP, addr, ifname, port, tref.u32);
> + if (s >= 0)
> + tcp_sock_set_bufsize(c, s);
> + else
> + s = -1;
>
> - if (c->tcp.fwd_out.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> - tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V6] = s;
> - }
> + if (c->tcp.fwd_in.mode == FWD_AUTO)
> + tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V6] = s;
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -3144,7 +3091,7 @@ static void tcp_ns_sock_init4(const struct ctx *c, in_port_t port)
> {
> in_port_t idx = port + c->tcp.fwd_out.delta[port];
> union tcp_epoll_ref tref = { .tcp.listen = 1, .tcp.outbound = 1,
> - .tcp.splice = 1, .tcp.index = idx };
> + .tcp.index = idx };
> struct in_addr loopback = { htonl(INADDR_LOOPBACK) };
> int s;
>
> @@ -3169,8 +3116,7 @@ static void tcp_ns_sock_init6(const struct ctx *c, in_port_t port)
> {
> in_port_t idx = port + c->tcp.fwd_out.delta[port];
> union tcp_epoll_ref tref = { .tcp.listen = 1, .tcp.outbound = 1,
> - .tcp.splice = 1, .tcp.v6 = 1,
> - .tcp.index = idx};
> + .tcp.v6 = 1, .tcp.index = idx};
Space missing here (from 14/32).
> int s;
>
> assert(c->mode == MODE_PASTA);
> @@ -3337,7 +3283,6 @@ int tcp_init(struct ctx *c)
> memset(init_sock_pool6, 0xff, sizeof(init_sock_pool6));
> memset(ns_sock_pool4, 0xff, sizeof(ns_sock_pool4));
> memset(ns_sock_pool6, 0xff, sizeof(ns_sock_pool6));
> - memset(tcp_sock_init_lo, 0xff, sizeof(tcp_sock_init_lo));
> memset(tcp_sock_init_ext, 0xff, sizeof(tcp_sock_init_ext));
> memset(tcp_sock_ns, 0xff, sizeof(tcp_sock_ns));
>
> @@ -3445,16 +3390,6 @@ static int tcp_port_rebind(void *arg)
> close(tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V6]);
> tcp_sock_init_ext[port][V6] = -1;
> }
> -
> - if (tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V4] >= 0) {
> - close(tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V4]);
> - tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V4] = -1;
> - }
> -
> - if (tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V6] >= 0) {
> - close(tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V6]);
> - tcp_sock_init_lo[port][V6] = -1;
> - }
> continue;
> }
>
> diff --git a/tcp_splice.c b/tcp_splice.c
> index 7007501..30d49d4 100644
> --- a/tcp_splice.c
> +++ b/tcp_splice.c
> @@ -502,19 +502,35 @@ static void tcp_splice_dir(struct tcp_splice_conn *conn, int ref_sock,
> }
>
> /**
> - * tcp_splice_conn_from_sock() - Initialize state for spliced connection
> + * tcp_splice_conn_from_sock() - Attempt to init state for a spliced connection
> * @c: Execution context
> * @ref: epoll reference of listening socket
> * @conn: connection structure to initialize
> * @s: Accepted socket
> + * @sa: Peer address of connection
> *
> + * Return: true if able to create a spliced connection, false otherwise
> * #syscalls:pasta setsockopt
> */
> -void tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> - struct tcp_splice_conn *conn, int s)
> +bool tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> + struct tcp_splice_conn *conn, int s,
> + const struct sockaddr *sa)
> {
> assert(c->mode == MODE_PASTA);
>
> + if (ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.v6) {
> + const struct sockaddr_in6 *sa6
> + = (const struct sockaddr_in6 *)sa;
Maybe you could split declaration and assignment here.
> + if (!IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa6->sin6_addr))
> + return false;
> + conn->flags = SPLICE_V6;
> + } else {
> + const struct sockaddr_in *sa4 = (const struct sockaddr_in *)sa;
> + if (!IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa4->sin_addr))
> + return false;
> + conn->flags = 0;
> + }
> +
> if (setsockopt(s, SOL_TCP, TCP_QUICKACK, &((int){ 1 }),
> sizeof(int))) {
> trace("TCP (spliced): failed to set TCP_QUICKACK on %i",
> @@ -524,11 +540,12 @@ void tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> conn->c.spliced = true;
> c->tcp.splice_conn_count++;
> conn->a = s;
> - conn->flags = ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.v6 ? SPLICE_V6 : 0;
>
> if (tcp_splice_new(c, conn, ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.index,
> ref.r.p.tcp.tcp.outbound))
> conn_flag(c, conn, CLOSING);
> +
> + return true;
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/tcp_splice.h b/tcp_splice.h
> index f9462ae..1a915dd 100644
> --- a/tcp_splice.h
> +++ b/tcp_splice.h
> @@ -10,8 +10,9 @@ struct tcp_splice_conn;
>
> void tcp_sock_handler_splice(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> uint32_t events);
> -void tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> - struct tcp_splice_conn *conn, int s);
> +bool tcp_splice_conn_from_sock(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> + struct tcp_splice_conn *conn, int s,
> + const struct sockaddr *sa);
> void tcp_splice_init(struct ctx *c);
>
> #endif /* TCP_SPLICE_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 23:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-16 4:41 [PATCH 00/32] Use dual stack sockets to listen for inbound TCP connections David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 01/32] clang-tidy: Suppress warning about assignments in if statements David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:20 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 02/32] style: Minor corrections to function comments David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:21 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 03/32] tcp_splice: #include tcp_splice.h in tcp_splice.c David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 04/32] tcp: Remove unused TCP_MAX_SOCKS constant David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 05/32] tcp: Better helpers for converting between connection pointer and index David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:24 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 06/32] tcp_splice: Helpers for converting from index to/from tcp_splice_conn David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 07/32] tcp: Move connection state structures into a shared header David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 08/32] tcp: Add connection union type David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 09/32] tcp: Improved helpers to update connections after moving David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 10/32] tcp: Unify spliced and non-spliced connection tables David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 11/32] tcp: Unify tcp_defer_handler and tcp_splice_defer_handler() David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 12/32] tcp: Partially unify tcp_timer() and tcp_splice_timer() David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 13/32] tcp: Unify the IN_EPOLL flag David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 14/32] tcp: Separate helpers to create ns listening sockets David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:51 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:32 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 15/32] tcp: Unify part of spliced and non-spliced conn_from_sock path David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:53 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:37 ` David Gibson
2022-11-17 7:30 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 8:58 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 16/32] tcp: Use the same sockets to listen for spliced and non-spliced connections David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:54 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2022-11-17 1:43 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 17/32] tcp: Remove splice from tcp_epoll_ref David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 18/32] tcp: Don't store hash bucket in connection structures David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:41 ` [PATCH 19/32] inany: Helper functions for handling addresses which could be IPv4 or IPv6 David Gibson
2022-11-16 23:54 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:48 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 20/32] tcp: Hash IPv4 and IPv4-mapped-IPv6 addresses the same David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 21/32] tcp: Take tcp_hash_insert() address from struct tcp_conn David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 22/32] tcp: Simplify tcp_hash_match() to take an inany_addr David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 23/32] tcp: Unify initial sequence number calculation for IPv4 and IPv6 David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 24/32] tcp: Have tcp_seq_init() take its parameters from struct tcp_conn David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 25/32] tcp: Fix small errors in tcp_seq_init() time handling David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 26/32] tcp: Remove v6 flag from tcp_epoll_ref David Gibson
2022-11-17 0:15 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 1:50 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 27/32] tcp: NAT IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses like IPv4 addresses David Gibson
2022-11-17 0:15 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 2:00 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 28/32] tcp_splice: Allow splicing of connections from IPv4-mapped loopback David Gibson
2022-11-17 0:15 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 2:05 ` David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 29/32] tcp: Consolidate tcp_sock_init[46] David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 30/32] util: Allow sock_l4() to open dual stack sockets David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 31/32] util: Always return -1 on error in sock_l4() David Gibson
2022-11-16 4:42 ` [PATCH 32/32] tcp: Use dual stack sockets for port forwarding when possible David Gibson
2022-11-17 0:15 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-11-17 2:08 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221117005405.70227aba@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).