public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] udp: Split sending to passt tap interface into separate function
Date: Mon,  5 Dec 2022 19:14:19 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221205081425.2614425-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205081425.2614425-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

The last part of udp_sock_handler() does the actual on-sending of frames
to the tap interface.  For pasta that's just a call to udp_tap_send_pasta()
but for passt, it's a moderately complex and open coded.

For symmetry, move the passt send path into its own function,
udp_tap_send_passt().  This will make it easier to abstract the tap
interface in future (e.g. when we want to add vhost-user).

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 udp.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)

diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
index a27fe88..7281bc3 100644
--- a/udp.c
+++ b/udp.c
@@ -812,6 +812,73 @@ static void udp_tap_send_pasta(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh,
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * udp_tap_send_passt() - Send datagrams to the passt tap interface
+ * @c:		Execution context
+ * @mmh:	Array of message headers to send
+ * @n:		Number of message headers to send
+ *
+ * #syscalls:passt sendmmsg sendmsg
+ */
+static void udp_tap_send_passt(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh, int n)
+{
+	struct msghdr *last_mh;
+	ssize_t missing = 0;
+	size_t msg_len = 0;
+	unsigned int i;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = sendmmsg(c->fd_tap, mmh, n, MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (ret <= 0)
+		return;
+
+	/* If we lose some messages to sendmmsg() here, fine, it's UDP. However,
+	 * the last message needs to be delivered completely, otherwise qemu
+	 * will fail to reassemble the next message and close the connection. Go
+	 * through headers from the last sent message, counting bytes, and, if
+	 * and as soon as we see more bytes than sendmmsg() sent, re-send the
+	 * rest with a blocking call.
+	 *
+	 * In pictures, given this example:
+	 *
+	 *				 	iov #0  iov #1  iov #2  iov #3
+	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr:		....    ......  .....   ......
+	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len:	7	....    ...
+	 *
+	 * when 'msglen' reaches:	10		      ^
+	 * and 'missing' below is:	3	           ---
+	 *
+	 * re-send everything from here:		   ^--  -----   ------
+	 */
+	last_mh = &mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr;
+	for (i = 0; i < last_mh->msg_iovlen; i++) {
+		if (missing <= 0) {
+			msg_len += last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len;
+			missing = msg_len - mmh[ret - 1].msg_len;
+		}
+
+		if (missing > 0) {
+			uint8_t **iov_base;
+			int first_offset;
+
+			iov_base = (uint8_t **)&last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
+			first_offset = last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len - missing;
+			*iov_base += first_offset;
+			last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len = missing;
+
+			last_mh->msg_iov = &last_mh->msg_iov[i];
+
+			if (sendmsg(c->fd_tap, last_mh, MSG_NOSIGNAL) < 0)
+				debug("UDP: %li bytes to tap missing", missing);
+
+			*iov_base -= first_offset;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pcapmm(mmh, ret);
+}
+
 /**
  * udp_sock_handler() - Handle new data from socket
  * @c:		Execution context
@@ -820,16 +887,14 @@ static void udp_tap_send_pasta(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh,
  * @now:	Current timestamp
  *
  * #syscalls recvmmsg
- * #syscalls:passt sendmmsg sendmsg
  */
 void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 		      const struct timespec *now)
 {
 	in_port_t dstport = ref.r.p.udp.udp.port;
-	ssize_t n, msg_len = 0, missing = 0;
 	struct mmsghdr *tap_mmh, *sock_mmh;
-	int msg_bufs = 0, msg_i = 0, ret;
-	struct msghdr *last_mh;
+	int msg_bufs = 0, msg_i = 0;
+	ssize_t n, msg_len = 0;
 	struct iovec *tap_iov;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -879,61 +944,10 @@ void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 	}
 	tap_mmh[msg_i].msg_hdr.msg_iovlen = msg_bufs;
 
-	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA) {
+	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA)
 		udp_tap_send_pasta(c, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	ret = sendmmsg(c->fd_tap, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1,
-		       MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_DONTWAIT);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		return;
-
-	/* If we lose some messages to sendmmsg() here, fine, it's UDP. However,
-	 * the last message needs to be delivered completely, otherwise qemu
-	 * will fail to reassemble the next message and close the connection. Go
-	 * through headers from the last sent message, counting bytes, and, if
-	 * and as soon as we see more bytes than sendmmsg() sent, re-send the
-	 * rest with a blocking call.
-	 *
-	 * In pictures, given this example:
-	 *
-	 *				 	iov #0  iov #1  iov #2  iov #3
-	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr:		....    ......  .....   ......
-	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len:	7	....    ...
-	 *
-	 * when 'msglen' reaches:	10		      ^
-	 * and 'missing' below is:	3	           ---
-	 *
-	 * re-send everything from here:		   ^--  -----   ------
-	 */
-	last_mh = &tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr;
-	for (i = 0, msg_len = 0; i < last_mh->msg_iovlen; i++) {
-		if (missing <= 0) {
-			msg_len += last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len;
-			missing = msg_len - tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len;
-		}
-
-		if (missing > 0) {
-			uint8_t **iov_base;
-			int first_offset;
-
-			iov_base = (uint8_t **)&last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
-			first_offset = last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len - missing;
-			*iov_base += first_offset;
-			last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len = missing;
-
-			last_mh->msg_iov = &last_mh->msg_iov[i];
-
-			if (sendmsg(c->fd_tap, last_mh, MSG_NOSIGNAL) < 0)
-				debug("UDP: %li bytes to tap missing", missing);
-
-			*iov_base -= first_offset;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	pcapmm(tap_mmh, ret);
+	else
+		udp_tap_send_passt(c, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
@@ -812,6 +812,73 @@ static void udp_tap_send_pasta(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh,
 	}
 }
 
+/**
+ * udp_tap_send_passt() - Send datagrams to the passt tap interface
+ * @c:		Execution context
+ * @mmh:	Array of message headers to send
+ * @n:		Number of message headers to send
+ *
+ * #syscalls:passt sendmmsg sendmsg
+ */
+static void udp_tap_send_passt(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh, int n)
+{
+	struct msghdr *last_mh;
+	ssize_t missing = 0;
+	size_t msg_len = 0;
+	unsigned int i;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = sendmmsg(c->fd_tap, mmh, n, MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	if (ret <= 0)
+		return;
+
+	/* If we lose some messages to sendmmsg() here, fine, it's UDP. However,
+	 * the last message needs to be delivered completely, otherwise qemu
+	 * will fail to reassemble the next message and close the connection. Go
+	 * through headers from the last sent message, counting bytes, and, if
+	 * and as soon as we see more bytes than sendmmsg() sent, re-send the
+	 * rest with a blocking call.
+	 *
+	 * In pictures, given this example:
+	 *
+	 *				 	iov #0  iov #1  iov #2  iov #3
+	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr:		....    ......  .....   ......
+	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len:	7	....    ...
+	 *
+	 * when 'msglen' reaches:	10		      ^
+	 * and 'missing' below is:	3	           ---
+	 *
+	 * re-send everything from here:		   ^--  -----   ------
+	 */
+	last_mh = &mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr;
+	for (i = 0; i < last_mh->msg_iovlen; i++) {
+		if (missing <= 0) {
+			msg_len += last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len;
+			missing = msg_len - mmh[ret - 1].msg_len;
+		}
+
+		if (missing > 0) {
+			uint8_t **iov_base;
+			int first_offset;
+
+			iov_base = (uint8_t **)&last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
+			first_offset = last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len - missing;
+			*iov_base += first_offset;
+			last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len = missing;
+
+			last_mh->msg_iov = &last_mh->msg_iov[i];
+
+			if (sendmsg(c->fd_tap, last_mh, MSG_NOSIGNAL) < 0)
+				debug("UDP: %li bytes to tap missing", missing);
+
+			*iov_base -= first_offset;
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+
+	pcapmm(mmh, ret);
+}
+
 /**
  * udp_sock_handler() - Handle new data from socket
  * @c:		Execution context
@@ -820,16 +887,14 @@ static void udp_tap_send_pasta(const struct ctx *c, struct mmsghdr *mmh,
  * @now:	Current timestamp
  *
  * #syscalls recvmmsg
- * #syscalls:passt sendmmsg sendmsg
  */
 void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 		      const struct timespec *now)
 {
 	in_port_t dstport = ref.r.p.udp.udp.port;
-	ssize_t n, msg_len = 0, missing = 0;
 	struct mmsghdr *tap_mmh, *sock_mmh;
-	int msg_bufs = 0, msg_i = 0, ret;
-	struct msghdr *last_mh;
+	int msg_bufs = 0, msg_i = 0;
+	ssize_t n, msg_len = 0;
 	struct iovec *tap_iov;
 	unsigned int i;
 
@@ -879,61 +944,10 @@ void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 	}
 	tap_mmh[msg_i].msg_hdr.msg_iovlen = msg_bufs;
 
-	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA) {
+	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA)
 		udp_tap_send_pasta(c, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	ret = sendmmsg(c->fd_tap, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1,
-		       MSG_NOSIGNAL | MSG_DONTWAIT);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		return;
-
-	/* If we lose some messages to sendmmsg() here, fine, it's UDP. However,
-	 * the last message needs to be delivered completely, otherwise qemu
-	 * will fail to reassemble the next message and close the connection. Go
-	 * through headers from the last sent message, counting bytes, and, if
-	 * and as soon as we see more bytes than sendmmsg() sent, re-send the
-	 * rest with a blocking call.
-	 *
-	 * In pictures, given this example:
-	 *
-	 *				 	iov #0  iov #1  iov #2  iov #3
-	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr:		....    ......  .....   ......
-	 * tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len:	7	....    ...
-	 *
-	 * when 'msglen' reaches:	10		      ^
-	 * and 'missing' below is:	3	           ---
-	 *
-	 * re-send everything from here:		   ^--  -----   ------
-	 */
-	last_mh = &tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_hdr;
-	for (i = 0, msg_len = 0; i < last_mh->msg_iovlen; i++) {
-		if (missing <= 0) {
-			msg_len += last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len;
-			missing = msg_len - tap_mmh[ret - 1].msg_len;
-		}
-
-		if (missing > 0) {
-			uint8_t **iov_base;
-			int first_offset;
-
-			iov_base = (uint8_t **)&last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_base;
-			first_offset = last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len - missing;
-			*iov_base += first_offset;
-			last_mh->msg_iov[i].iov_len = missing;
-
-			last_mh->msg_iov = &last_mh->msg_iov[i];
-
-			if (sendmsg(c->fd_tap, last_mh, MSG_NOSIGNAL) < 0)
-				debug("UDP: %li bytes to tap missing", missing);
-
-			*iov_base -= first_offset;
-			break;
-		}
-	}
-
-	pcapmm(tap_mmh, ret);
+	else
+		udp_tap_send_passt(c, tap_mmh, msg_i + 1);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.38.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-12-05  8:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-05  8:14 [PATCH 0/8] Don't use additional sockets for receiving "spliced" UDP communications David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] udp: Move sending pasta tap frames to the end of udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` David Gibson [this message]
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] udp: Split receive from preparation and send in udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] udp: Receive multiple datagrams at once on the pasta sock->tap path David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14  1:42     ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35       ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-20 10:42         ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-21  6:00           ` David Gibson
2022-12-22  2:37             ` Stefano Brivio
2023-01-04  0:08             ` Stefano Brivio
2023-01-04  4:53               ` David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] udp: Pre-populate msg_names with local address David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14  1:22     ` David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] udp: Unify udp_sock_handler_splice() with udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14  1:19     ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35       ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] udp: Decide whether to "splice" per datagram rather than per socket David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:49   ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14  1:47     ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35       ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-15  0:33         ` David Gibson
2022-12-05  8:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] udp: Don't use separate sockets to listen for spliced packets David Gibson
2022-12-06  6:45 ` [PATCH 0/8] Don't use additional sockets for receiving "spliced" UDP communications Stefano Brivio
2022-12-06  6:46   ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221205081425.2614425-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).