From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] udp: Unify udp_sock_handler_splice() with udp_sock_handler()
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 23:48:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221213234858.474602c1@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221205081425.2614425-7-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Mon, 5 Dec 2022 19:14:23 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> These two functions now have a very similar structure, and their first
> part (calling recvmmsg()) is functionally identical. So, merge the two
> functions into one.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> udp.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
> index 7c601cc..6ccfe8c 100644
> --- a/udp.c
> +++ b/udp.c
> @@ -590,52 +590,6 @@ static void udp_splice_sendfrom(const struct ctx *c, unsigned start, unsigned n,
> sendmmsg(s, mmh_send + start, n, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
> }
>
> -/**
> - * udp_sock_handler_splice() - Handler for socket mapped to "spliced" connection
> - * @c: Execution context
> - * @ref: epoll reference
> - * @events: epoll events bitmap
> - * @now: Current timestamp
> - */
> -static void udp_sock_handler_splice(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref,
> - uint32_t events, const struct timespec *now)
> -{
> - in_port_t dst = ref.r.p.udp.udp.port;
> - int v6 = ref.r.p.udp.udp.v6, n, i, m;
> - struct mmsghdr *mmh_recv;
> -
> - if (!(events & EPOLLIN))
> - return;
> -
> - if (v6)
> - mmh_recv = udp6_l2_mh_sock;
> - else
> - mmh_recv = udp4_l2_mh_sock;
> -
> - n = recvmmsg(ref.r.s, mmh_recv, UDP_MAX_FRAMES, 0, NULL);
> -
> - if (n <= 0)
> - return;
> -
> - if (v6)
> - udp_localname6.sin6_port = htons(dst);
> - else
> - udp_localname4.sin_port = htons(dst);
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < n; i += m) {
> - in_port_t src = sa_port(v6, mmh_recv[i].msg_hdr.msg_name);
> -
> - for (m = 1; i + m < n; m++) {
> - void *mname = mmh_recv[i + m].msg_hdr.msg_name;
> - if (sa_port(v6, mname) != src)
> - break;
> - }
> -
> - udp_splice_sendfrom(c, i, m, src, dst, v6, ref.r.p.udp.udp.ns,
> - ref.r.p.udp.udp.orig, now);
> - }
> -}
> -
> /**
> * udp_update_hdr4() - Update headers for one IPv4 datagram
> * @c: Execution context
> @@ -945,27 +899,43 @@ void udp_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
> {
> in_port_t dstport = ref.r.p.udp.udp.port;
> bool v6 = ref.r.p.udp.udp.v6;
> - struct mmsghdr *sock_mmh;
> + struct mmsghdr *mmh_recv;
> + unsigned int i, m;
> ssize_t n;
>
> - if (events == EPOLLERR)
> + if (!(events & EPOLLIN))
Pre-existing, unrelated issue, but this reminds me: we don't handle
socket errors here, and while udp_timer_one() will drop any sockets we
created, eventually, it would probably be better to act right away.
Not that I have in mind a valid example of an error on UDP sockets,
except perhaps if the interface goes down (but we'll handle that
separately).
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-13 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-05 8:14 [PATCH 0/8] Don't use additional sockets for receiving "spliced" UDP communications David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 1/8] udp: Move sending pasta tap frames to the end of udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 2/8] udp: Split sending to passt tap interface into separate function David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 3/8] udp: Split receive from preparation and send in udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 4/8] udp: Receive multiple datagrams at once on the pasta sock->tap path David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14 1:42 ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-20 10:42 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-21 6:00 ` David Gibson
2022-12-22 2:37 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-01-04 0:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-01-04 4:53 ` David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 5/8] udp: Pre-populate msg_names with local address David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14 1:22 ` David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 6/8] udp: Unify udp_sock_handler_splice() with udp_sock_handler() David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:48 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2022-12-14 1:19 ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 7/8] udp: Decide whether to "splice" per datagram rather than per socket David Gibson
2022-12-13 22:49 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-14 1:47 ` David Gibson
2022-12-14 10:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2022-12-15 0:33 ` David Gibson
2022-12-05 8:14 ` [PATCH 8/8] udp: Don't use separate sockets to listen for spliced packets David Gibson
2022-12-06 6:45 ` [PATCH 0/8] Don't use additional sockets for receiving "spliced" UDP communications Stefano Brivio
2022-12-06 6:46 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20221213234858.474602c1@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).