[PATCH 5/9] epoll: Tiny cleanup to udp_sock_handler()

[David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>]

Move the test for c->no_udp into the function itself, rather than in the
dispatching switch statement to better localize the UDP specific logic, and
make for greated consistency with other handler functions.

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 passt.c | 3 +--
 udp.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/passt.c b/passt.c
index 33c2162..c7d7f56 100644
--- a/passt.c
+++ b/passt.c
@@ -325,8 +325,7 @@ loop:
 				tcp_sock_handler(&c, ref, eventmask, &now);
 			break;
 		case EPOLL_TYPE_UDP:
-			if (!c.no_udp)
-				udp_sock_handler(&c, ref, eventmask, &now);
+			udp_sock_handler(&c, ref, eventmask, &now);
 			break;
 		case EPOLL_TYPE_ICMP:
 			icmp_sock_handler(&c, ref);
diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
index 62f8360..138e7ab 100644
--- a/udp.c
+++ b/udp.c
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void udp_sock_handler(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 	struct mmsghdr *mmh_recv;
 	int i, m;
 
-	if (!(events & EPOLLIN))
+	if (c->no_udp || !(events & EPOLLIN))
 		return;
 
 	if (v6) {
-- 
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ void udp_sock_handler(struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t events,
 	struct mmsghdr *mmh_recv;
 	int i, m;
 
-	if (!(events & EPOLLIN))
+	if (c->no_udp || !(events & EPOLLIN))
 		return;
 
 	if (v6) {
-- 
2.41.0