From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v2 02/10] siphash: Make sip round calculations an inline function rather than macro
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 11:20:54 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230928012102.1446180-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230928012102.1446180-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The SIPROUND(n) macro implements n rounds of SipHash shuffling. It relies
on 'v' and '__i' variables being available in the context it's used in
which isn't great hygeine. Replace it with an inline function instead.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
siphash.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/siphash.c b/siphash.c
index 20009fe..e1fcf18 100644
--- a/siphash.c
+++ b/siphash.c
@@ -68,29 +68,36 @@
v[__i] = k[__i % 2]; \
} while (0)
-#define SIPROUND(n) \
- do { \
- for (__i = 0; __i < (n); __i++) { \
- v[0] += v[1]; \
- v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 13) ^ v[0]; \
- v[0] = ROTL(v[0], 32); \
- v[2] += v[3]; \
- v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 16) ^ v[2]; \
- v[0] += v[3]; \
- v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 21) ^ v[0]; \
- v[2] += v[1]; \
- v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 17) ^ v[2]; \
- v[2] = ROTL(v[2], 32); \
- } \
- } while (0)
+/**
+ * sipround() - Perform rounds of SipHash scrambling
+ * @v: siphash state (4 x 64-bit integers)
+ * @n: Number of rounds to apply
+ */
+static inline void sipround(uint64_t *v, int n)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ v[0] += v[1];
+ v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 13) ^ v[0];
+ v[0] = ROTL(v[0], 32);
+ v[2] += v[3];
+ v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 16) ^ v[2];
+ v[0] += v[3];
+ v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 21) ^ v[0];
+ v[2] += v[1];
+ v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 17) ^ v[2];
+ v[2] = ROTL(v[2], 32);
+ }
+}
#define POSTAMBLE \
do { \
v[3] ^= b; \
- SIPROUND(2); \
+ sipround(v, 2); \
v[0] ^= b; \
v[2] ^= 0xff; \
- SIPROUND(4); \
+ sipround(v, 4); \
b = (v[0] ^ v[1]) ^ (v[2] ^ v[3]); \
} while (0)
@@ -117,7 +124,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_8b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
{
PREAMBLE(8);
v[3] ^= *(uint64_t *)in;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= *(uint64_t *)in;
POSTAMBLE;
@@ -143,7 +150,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_12b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
PREAMBLE(12);
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
b |= *(in32 + 2);
POSTAMBLE;
@@ -171,7 +178,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_20b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
uint64_t combined = (uint64_t)(*(in32 + 1)) << 32 | *in32;
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
}
@@ -200,7 +207,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_32b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, in64++) {
v[3] ^= *in64;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= *in64;
}
@@ -229,7 +236,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_36b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
uint64_t combined = (uint64_t)(*(in32 + 1)) << 32 | *in32;
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
}
--
@@ -68,29 +68,36 @@
v[__i] = k[__i % 2]; \
} while (0)
-#define SIPROUND(n) \
- do { \
- for (__i = 0; __i < (n); __i++) { \
- v[0] += v[1]; \
- v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 13) ^ v[0]; \
- v[0] = ROTL(v[0], 32); \
- v[2] += v[3]; \
- v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 16) ^ v[2]; \
- v[0] += v[3]; \
- v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 21) ^ v[0]; \
- v[2] += v[1]; \
- v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 17) ^ v[2]; \
- v[2] = ROTL(v[2], 32); \
- } \
- } while (0)
+/**
+ * sipround() - Perform rounds of SipHash scrambling
+ * @v: siphash state (4 x 64-bit integers)
+ * @n: Number of rounds to apply
+ */
+static inline void sipround(uint64_t *v, int n)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
+ v[0] += v[1];
+ v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 13) ^ v[0];
+ v[0] = ROTL(v[0], 32);
+ v[2] += v[3];
+ v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 16) ^ v[2];
+ v[0] += v[3];
+ v[3] = ROTL(v[3], 21) ^ v[0];
+ v[2] += v[1];
+ v[1] = ROTL(v[1], 17) ^ v[2];
+ v[2] = ROTL(v[2], 32);
+ }
+}
#define POSTAMBLE \
do { \
v[3] ^= b; \
- SIPROUND(2); \
+ sipround(v, 2); \
v[0] ^= b; \
v[2] ^= 0xff; \
- SIPROUND(4); \
+ sipround(v, 4); \
b = (v[0] ^ v[1]) ^ (v[2] ^ v[3]); \
} while (0)
@@ -117,7 +124,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_8b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
{
PREAMBLE(8);
v[3] ^= *(uint64_t *)in;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= *(uint64_t *)in;
POSTAMBLE;
@@ -143,7 +150,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_12b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
PREAMBLE(12);
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
b |= *(in32 + 2);
POSTAMBLE;
@@ -171,7 +178,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_20b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
uint64_t combined = (uint64_t)(*(in32 + 1)) << 32 | *in32;
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
}
@@ -200,7 +207,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_32b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
for (i = 0; i < 4; i++, in64++) {
v[3] ^= *in64;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= *in64;
}
@@ -229,7 +236,7 @@ uint64_t siphash_36b(const uint8_t *in, const uint64_t *k)
uint64_t combined = (uint64_t)(*(in32 + 1)) << 32 | *in32;
v[3] ^= combined;
- SIPROUND(2);
+ sipround(v, 2);
v[0] ^= combined;
}
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 1:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-28 1:20 [PATCH v2 00/10] siphash: cleanups and fixes David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] siphash: Make siphash functions consistently return 64-bit results David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` David Gibson [this message]
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] siphash: Add siphash_feed() helper David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] siphash: Clean up hash finalisation with posthash_final() function David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] siphash: Fix bug in state initialisation David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] siphash: Use more hygienic state initialiser David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:20 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] siphash: Use specific structure for internal state David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:21 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] siphash: Make internal helpers public David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:21 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] siphash, checksum: Move TBAA explanation to checksum.c David Gibson
2023-09-28 1:21 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] siphash: Use incremental rather than all-at-once siphash functions David Gibson
2023-09-30 10:43 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] siphash: cleanups and fixes Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230928012102.1446180-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).