From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: passt-dev@passt.top, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: jk@lutty.net, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] udp: Fix 16-bit overflow in udp_invert_portmap()
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 13:48:24 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220024824.2198704-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240220024824.2198704-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
The code in udp_invert_portmap() is written based on an incorrect
understanding of C's (arcane) integer promotion rules. We calculate
'(in_port_t)i + delta' expecting the result to be of type in_port_t (16
bits). However "small integer types" (those narrower than 'int') are
always promoted to int for expressions, meaning this calculation can
overrun the rdelta[] array.
Fix this, and use a new intermediate for the index, to make it very clear
what it's type is. We also change i to unsigned, to avoid any possible
confusion from mixing signed and unsigned types.
Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=80
Reported-by: Laurent Jacquot <jk@lutty.net>
Suggested-by: Laurent Jacquot <jk@lutty.net>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
udp.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
index c031a053..a3961bfd 100644
--- a/udp.c
+++ b/udp.c
@@ -258,15 +258,16 @@ void udp_portmap_clear(void)
*/
static void udp_invert_portmap(struct udp_port_fwd *fwd)
{
- int i;
+ unsigned int i;
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta) == ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->rdelta),
"Forward and reverse delta arrays must have same size");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta); i++) {
in_port_t delta = fwd->f.delta[i];
+ in_port_t rport = i + delta;
if (delta)
- fwd->rdelta[(in_port_t)i + delta] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
+ fwd->rdelta[rport] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
}
}
--
@@ -258,15 +258,16 @@ void udp_portmap_clear(void)
*/
static void udp_invert_portmap(struct udp_port_fwd *fwd)
{
- int i;
+ unsigned int i;
static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta) == ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->rdelta),
"Forward and reverse delta arrays must have same size");
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fwd->f.delta); i++) {
in_port_t delta = fwd->f.delta[i];
+ in_port_t rport = i + delta;
if (delta)
- fwd->rdelta[(in_port_t)i + delta] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
+ fwd->rdelta[rport] = NUM_PORTS - delta;
}
}
--
2.43.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 2:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-20 2:48 [PATCH 0/2] Fix buffer overrun in UDP setup (bug 80) David Gibson
2024-02-20 2:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] udp: Assertion in udp_invert_portmap() can be calculated at compile time David Gibson
2024-02-20 2:48 ` David Gibson [this message]
2024-02-20 7:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] Fix buffer overrun in UDP setup (bug 80) Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240220024824.2198704-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jk@lutty.net \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).