From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] checksum: introduce functions to compute the header part checksum for TCP/UDP
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 2024 08:05:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240229080509.4f534831@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Zd_SHfjWotZmAwBn@zatzit>
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:38:53 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:26:18PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > On 2/19/24 04:08, David Gibson wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 04:07:23PM +0100, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * proto_ipv6_header_psum() - Calculates the partial checksum of an
> > > > + * IPv6 header for UDP or TCP
> > > > + * @payload_len: Payload length
> > > > + * @proto: Protocol number
> > > > + * @saddr: Source address
> > > > + * @daddr: Destination address
> > > > + * Returns: Partial checksum of the IPv6 header
> > > > + */
> > > > +uint32_t proto_ipv6_header_psum(uint16_t payload_len, uint8_t protocol,
> > > > + struct in6_addr saddr, struct in6_addr daddr)
> > >
> > > Hrm, this is passing 2 16-byte IPv6 addresses by value, which might
> > > not be what we want.
> >
> > The idea here is to avoid the pointer alignment problem (&ip6h->saddr and
> > &ip6h->daddr can be misaligned).
>
> Ah, right. That's a neat idea, but I'm not sure it really helps: I
> think it will just move the misaligned access from inside the function
> to the call site, where we try to marshal the parameter from something
> unaligned.
I haven't tested this yet, but note that this is generally okay: the
problem is *dereferencing* an unaligned pointer. But if you load memory
from an aligned pointer, and extract a value from this memory, it's all
fine.
Speaking MIPS, this is not safe on all CPU models:
la $1, 1002 # s1 now contains the value 1002
lw $2, 0($1) # load word from memory at 1002 + 0 into s2
but this is:
la $1, 1000 # s1 now contains the value 1000
la $2, 1004 # s3 now contains the value 1004
lw $3, 0($1) # load word from memory at 1000 + 0 into s3
lw $4, 0($3) # load word from memory at 1004 + 0 into s4
sll $5, $3, 16 # 16-bit shift left s3 into s5
srl $6, $4, 16 # 16-bit shift right s4 into s6
or $2, $5, $6 # OR s5 and s6 into s2
On x86, as far as I know, mov will digest the equivalent of the first
version without issues.
> > Is it a better solution to copy the content of ip6h->saddr and ip6h->daddr
> > to some local variables and then provide the pointers of the local variables
> > to proto_ipv6_header_psum()?
>
> Honestly, I'm not sure.
I think it's pretty much the same. Let the compiler pass 16-byte
variables by value, and it will generally do this for us, but only if
needed.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-29 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-17 15:07 [PATCH v3 0/9] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 1) Laurent Vivier
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] iov: add some functions to manage iovec Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 2:45 ` David Gibson
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] pcap: add pcap_iov() Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 2:50 ` David Gibson
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] checksum: align buffers Laurent Vivier
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] checksum: add csum_iov() Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 2:52 ` David Gibson
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] util: move IP stuff from util.[ch] to ip.[ch] Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 2:59 ` David Gibson
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] checksum: use csum_ip4_header() in udp.c and tcp.c Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 3:01 ` David Gibson
2024-02-29 16:24 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-29 23:10 ` David Gibson
2024-03-01 7:58 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-03-01 12:23 ` David Gibson
2024-03-04 17:04 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] checksum: introduce functions to compute the header part checksum for TCP/UDP Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 3:08 ` David Gibson
2024-02-28 13:26 ` Laurent Vivier
2024-02-29 0:38 ` David Gibson
2024-02-29 7:05 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-02-29 8:49 ` David Gibson
2024-02-29 8:56 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-29 14:15 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-29 23:09 ` David Gibson
2024-03-01 6:56 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-03-04 1:54 ` David Gibson
2024-03-04 11:00 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-03-04 22:47 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-03-06 5:09 ` David Gibson
2024-03-08 0:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-03-08 1:20 ` David Gibson
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] tap: make tap_update_mac() generic Laurent Vivier
2024-02-17 15:07 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] tcp: Introduce ipv4_fill_headers()/ipv6_fill_headers() Laurent Vivier
2024-02-19 3:14 ` David Gibson
2024-02-29 16:29 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-29 16:31 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 1) Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240229080509.4f534831@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).