From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: lvivier@redhat.com, passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Remove stale archivemount support
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2024 20:09:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240405200921.0a1f0318@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240322022739.2746102-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 13:27:37 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> mbuto has two ways of building the initramfs. One is the typical approach
> of staging its contents in a temporary directory, then building the
> initramfs with cpio. The other is to create an empty initramfs, mount
> it with archivemount, and copy things into the mounted archive.
>
> However, the archivemount approach is broken. I'm not entirely sure why,
> but it appears not to properly unmount the archive and retrieve the final.
> filled version. The upshot is that if archivemount is installed, then
> mbuto generates an empty, gzip-compressed initramfs instead of whatever it
> was supposed to. It looks like this has bitrotted from some earlier
> working version.
>
> The archivemount approach is not necessary, and honestly a pretty strange
> and roundabout way of building the initramfs. Remove it.
There were two reasons behind that: first off, I mistakenly assumed
that the kernel could see changes made to the initramfs after boot.
Second, it was actually convenient for developing this tool as I could
just make directories and copies in half-working images. I also had
half a mind about some usage with QEMU rebooting the guest, and the
initramfs would change across reboots without having to call mbuto
again, for bisections or suchlike.
But sure, it turned out to be quite complicated to maintain, and it
looks like it has been broken on Fedora for a while now (probably due
to differences between fakeroot and fakeroot-ng I didn't take into
account), so, with some regrets, I'm fine to drop this now.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-05 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-22 2:27 [PATCH 0/4] mbuto: Assorted fixes and simplifications David Gibson
2024-03-22 2:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] ${wd} is always set, no need to test for it David Gibson
2024-03-22 2:27 ` [PATCH 2/4] Remove stale archivemount support David Gibson
2024-04-05 18:09 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-04-06 3:02 ` David Gibson
2024-04-25 4:47 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-04-26 1:44 ` David Gibson
2024-03-22 2:27 ` [PATCH 3/4] Split "auto" compression mode into its own path David Gibson
2024-04-05 18:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-04-06 3:06 ` David Gibson
2024-04-25 4:46 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-04-26 1:46 ` David Gibson
2024-03-22 2:27 ` [PATCH 4/4] Remove unnecessary cpio_init function David Gibson
2024-04-05 18:08 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-04-06 3:11 ` David Gibson
2024-04-25 4:46 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240405200921.0a1f0318@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).