public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: "Maxime Bélair" <maxime.belair@canonical.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apparmor: Fix passt abstraction
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 14:28:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240517142809.265e69f3@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240517115053.53072-1-maxime.belair@canonical.com>

Hi Maxime,

On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:50:54 +0200
Maxime Bélair <maxime.belair@canonical.com> wrote:

> Commit b686afa2 introduced the invalid apparmor rule `mount options=(rw, runbindable) /,` since runbindable mount rules cannot have a source.

Oops, right, I didn't actually drop the source specification there. :(
Thanks for fixing this.

> Therefore running aa-logprof/aa-genprof will trigger errors (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/2065685)
> 
>     $ sudo aa-logprof
>     ERROR: Operation {'runbindable'} cannot have a source. Source = AARE('/')

I wonder why I don't see this on Debian testing with AppArmor 3.0.13
(same on openSUSE Tumbleweed).

Is there something in particular I should do to reproduce/check this?

> This patch fixes it to the intended behavior.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Bélair <maxime.belair@canonical.com>
> ---
>  contrib/apparmor/abstractions/passt | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/contrib/apparmor/abstractions/passt b/contrib/apparmor/abstractions/passt
> index 61ec32c..d245115 100644
> --- a/contrib/apparmor/abstractions/passt
> +++ b/contrib/apparmor/abstractions/passt
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
>    capability sys_ptrace,
>  
>    /					r,	# isolate_prefork(), isolation.c
> -  mount options=(rw, runbindable) /,
> +  mount options=(rw, runbindable) -> /,
>    mount		""	-> "/",
>    mount		""	-> "/tmp/",
>    pivot_root	"/tmp/" -> "/tmp/",

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-17 11:50 [PATCH] apparmor: Fix passt abstraction Maxime Bélair
2024-05-17 12:28 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-05-21  7:50   ` Maxime Bélair

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240517142809.265e69f3@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.belair@canonical.com \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).