From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:09:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612000950.6e8ad4b5@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605152129.1641658-4-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:21:24 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> Consolidate pool_tap4() and pool_tap6() into pool_flush_all(),
> and tap4_handler() and tap6_handler() into tap_handler_all().
> Create a generic packet_add_all() to consolidate packet
> addition logic and reduce code duplication.
>
> The purpose is to ease the export of these functions to use
> them with the vhost-user backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> tap.c | 113 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> tap.h | 7 ++++
> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index 2ea08491a51f..5fb3cb83f3d2 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -920,6 +920,61 @@ append:
> return in->count;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * pool_flush() - Flush both IPv4 and IPv6 packet pools
> + */
> +void pool_flush_all(void)
> +{
> + pool_flush(pool_tap4);
> + pool_flush(pool_tap6);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * tap_handler_all() - IPv4/IPv4 and ARP packet handler for tap file descriptor
IPv4/IPv6
> + * @c: Execution context
> + * @now: Current timestamp
> + */
> +void tap_handler_all(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now)
I wonder if this shouldn't be named tap_handler() instead. As we
already have tap_handler_passt() and tap_handler_pasta(), it's not
immediately clear what "all" refers to.
> +{
> + tap4_handler(c, pool_tap4, now);
> + tap6_handler(c, pool_tap6, now);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * packet_add_all_do() - Add a packet to the appropriate TAP pool
A couple of remarks here:
- it's a bit unexpected that this is still in tap.c (it adds packets to
a pool, it should be in packet.c judging by this name/description).
If we call it tap_queue_packet(), then it probably makes more sense?
- this does more than adding a packet to a pool. It's probably useless
to describe in detail what this does, as the function body is anyway
rather short and clear, but the current description could be a bit
misleading. What about "Queue/capture packet, update notion of
guest MAC address"?
- what happens if you just call packet_add() from here, without dealing
with 'func' and 'line'? I think it's fine to print in tracing output
name and lines from this function, instead of the ones from the
caller. It's obvious who the caller is
> + * @c: Execution context
> + * @l2len: Total L2 packet length
> + * @p: Packet buffer
> + * @func: For tracing: name of calling function, NULL means no trace()
> + * @line: For tracing: caller line of function call
> + */
> +void packet_add_all_do(struct ctx *c, ssize_t l2len, char *p,
> + const char *func, int line)
> +{
> + const struct ethhdr *eh;
> +
> + pcap(p, l2len);
> +
> + eh = (struct ethhdr *)p;
> +
> + if (memcmp(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN)) {
> + memcpy(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN);
> + proto_update_l2_buf(c->mac_guest, NULL);
> + }
> +
> + switch (ntohs(eh->h_proto)) {
> + case ETH_P_ARP:
> + case ETH_P_IP:
> + packet_add_do(pool_tap4, l2len, p, func, line);
> + break;
> + case ETH_P_IPV6:
> + packet_add_do(pool_tap6, l2len, p, func, line);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> /**
> * tap_sock_reset() - Handle closing or failure of connect AF_UNIX socket
> * @c: Execution context
> @@ -946,7 +1001,6 @@ static void tap_sock_reset(struct ctx *c)
> void tap_handler_passt(struct ctx *c, uint32_t events,
> const struct timespec *now)
> {
> - const struct ethhdr *eh;
> ssize_t n, rem;
> char *p;
>
> @@ -959,8 +1013,7 @@ redo:
> p = pkt_buf;
> rem = 0;
>
> - pool_flush(pool_tap4);
> - pool_flush(pool_tap6);
> + pool_flush_all();
>
> n = recv(c->fd_tap, p, TAP_BUF_FILL, MSG_DONTWAIT);
> if (n < 0) {
> @@ -987,38 +1040,18 @@ redo:
> /* Complete the partial read above before discarding a malformed
> * frame, otherwise the stream will be inconsistent.
> */
> - if (l2len < (ssize_t)sizeof(*eh) ||
> + if (l2len < (ssize_t)sizeof(struct ethhdr) ||
> l2len > (ssize_t)ETH_MAX_MTU)
> goto next;
>
> - pcap(p, l2len);
> -
> - eh = (struct ethhdr *)p;
> -
> - if (memcmp(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN)) {
> - memcpy(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN);
> - proto_update_l2_buf(c->mac_guest, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - switch (ntohs(eh->h_proto)) {
> - case ETH_P_ARP:
> - case ETH_P_IP:
> - packet_add(pool_tap4, l2len, p);
> - break;
> - case ETH_P_IPV6:
> - packet_add(pool_tap6, l2len, p);
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> + packet_add_all(c, l2len, p);
>
> next:
> p += l2len;
> n -= l2len;
> }
>
> - tap4_handler(c, pool_tap4, now);
> - tap6_handler(c, pool_tap6, now);
> + tap_handler_all(c, now);
>
> /* We can't use EPOLLET otherwise. */
> if (rem)
> @@ -1043,35 +1076,18 @@ void tap_handler_pasta(struct ctx *c, uint32_t events,
> redo:
> n = 0;
>
> - pool_flush(pool_tap4);
> - pool_flush(pool_tap6);
> + pool_flush_all();
> restart:
> while ((len = read(c->fd_tap, pkt_buf + n, TAP_BUF_BYTES - n)) > 0) {
> - const struct ethhdr *eh = (struct ethhdr *)(pkt_buf + n);
>
> - if (len < (ssize_t)sizeof(*eh) || len > (ssize_t)ETH_MAX_MTU) {
> + if (len < (ssize_t)sizeof(struct ethhdr) ||
> + len > (ssize_t)ETH_MAX_MTU) {
> n += len;
> continue;
> }
>
> - pcap(pkt_buf + n, len);
>
> - if (memcmp(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN)) {
> - memcpy(c->mac_guest, eh->h_source, ETH_ALEN);
> - proto_update_l2_buf(c->mac_guest, NULL);
> - }
> -
> - switch (ntohs(eh->h_proto)) {
> - case ETH_P_ARP:
> - case ETH_P_IP:
> - packet_add(pool_tap4, len, pkt_buf + n);
> - break;
> - case ETH_P_IPV6:
> - packet_add(pool_tap6, len, pkt_buf + n);
> - break;
> - default:
> - break;
> - }
> + packet_add_all(c, len, pkt_buf + n);
>
> if ((n += len) == TAP_BUF_BYTES)
> break;
> @@ -1082,8 +1098,7 @@ restart:
>
> ret = errno;
>
> - tap4_handler(c, pool_tap4, now);
> - tap6_handler(c, pool_tap6, now);
> + tap_handler_all(c, now);
>
> if (len > 0 || ret == EAGAIN)
> return;
> diff --git a/tap.h b/tap.h
> index 2285a87093f9..3ffb7d6c3a91 100644
> --- a/tap.h
> +++ b/tap.h
> @@ -70,5 +70,12 @@ void tap_handler_passt(struct ctx *c, uint32_t events,
> const struct timespec *now);
> int tap_sock_unix_open(char *sock_path);
> void tap_sock_init(struct ctx *c);
> +void pool_flush_all(void);
> +void tap_handler_all(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now);
> +
> +void packet_add_all_do(struct ctx *c, ssize_t l2len, char *p,
> + const char *func, int line);
> +#define packet_add_all(p, l2len, start) \
> + packet_add_all_do(p, l2len, start, __func__, __LINE__)
>
> #endif /* TAP_H */
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 15:21 [PATCH v5 0/8] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 2) Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] tcp: extract buffer management from tcp_send_flag() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 5:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 11:42 ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:32 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] tcp: move buffers management functions to their own file Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:14 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 12:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-06-12 6:18 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 6:34 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:37 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 6:21 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] udp: refactor UDP header update functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:27 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] udp: rename udp_sock_handler() to udp_buf_sock_handler() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:28 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] vhost-user: compare mode MODE_PASTA and not MODE_PASST Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iov: remove iov_copy() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] tap: use in->buf_size rather than sizeof(pkt_buf) Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612000950.6e8ad4b5@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).