From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] udp: refactor UDP header update functions
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2024 00:10:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240612001017.31692649@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240605152129.1641658-5-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Wed, 5 Jun 2024 17:21:25 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> This commit refactors the udp_update_hdr4() and udp_update_hdr6() functions
> to improve code portability by replacing the udp_meta_t parameter with
> more specific parameters for the IPv4 and IPv6 headers (iphdr/ipv6hdr)
> and the source socket address (sockaddr_in/sockaddr_in6).
> It also moves the tap_hdr_update() function call inside the udp_tap_send()
> function not to have to pass the TAP header to udp_update_hdr4() and
> udp_update_hdr6()
>
> This refactor reduces complexity by making the functions more modular and
> ensuring that each function operates on more narrowly scoped data structures.
> This will facilitate future backend introduction like vhost-user.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> udp.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
> index 3abafc994537..4295d48046a6 100644
> --- a/udp.c
> +++ b/udp.c
> @@ -556,7 +556,8 @@ static void udp_splice_sendfrom(const struct ctx *c, unsigned start, unsigned n,
> /**
> * udp_update_hdr4() - Update headers for one IPv4 datagram
> * @c: Execution context
> - * @bm: Pointer to udp_meta_t to update
> + * @ip4h: Pre-filled IPv4 header (except for tot_len and saddr)
> + * @s_in: Source socket address, filled in by recvmmsg()
> * @bp: Pointer to udp_payload_t to update
> * @dstport: Destination port number
> * @dlen: Length of UDP payload
> @@ -565,15 +566,16 @@ static void udp_splice_sendfrom(const struct ctx *c, unsigned start, unsigned n,
> * Return: size of IPv4 payload (UDP header + data)
> */
> static size_t udp_update_hdr4(const struct ctx *c,
> - struct udp_meta_t *bm, struct udp_payload_t *bp,
> + struct iphdr *ip4h, const struct sockaddr_in *s_in,
> + struct udp_payload_t *bp,
> in_port_t dstport, size_t dlen,
> const struct timespec *now)
> {
> - in_port_t srcport = ntohs(bm->s_in.sa4.sin_port);
> + in_port_t srcport = ntohs(s_in->sin_port);
> const struct in_addr dst = c->ip4.addr_seen;
> - struct in_addr src = bm->s_in.sa4.sin_addr;
> + struct in_addr src = s_in->sin_addr;
> size_t l4len = dlen + sizeof(bp->uh);
> - size_t l3len = l4len + sizeof(bm->ip4h);
> + size_t l3len = l4len + sizeof(*ip4h);
Nit: while at it, it would be nice to reorder declarations from longest
to shortest, as well.
>
> if (!IN4_IS_ADDR_UNSPECIFIED(&c->ip4.dns_match) &&
> IN4_ARE_ADDR_EQUAL(&src, &c->ip4.dns_host) && srcport == 53 &&
> @@ -594,24 +596,24 @@ static size_t udp_update_hdr4(const struct ctx *c,
> src = c->ip4.gw;
> }
>
> - bm->ip4h.tot_len = htons(l3len);
> - bm->ip4h.daddr = dst.s_addr;
> - bm->ip4h.saddr = src.s_addr;
> - bm->ip4h.check = csum_ip4_header(l3len, IPPROTO_UDP, src, dst);
> + ip4h->tot_len = htons(l3len);
> + ip4h->daddr = dst.s_addr;
> + ip4h->saddr = src.s_addr;
> + ip4h->check = csum_ip4_header(l3len, IPPROTO_UDP, src, dst);
>
> - bp->uh.source = bm->s_in.sa4.sin_port;
> + bp->uh.source = s_in->sin_port;
> bp->uh.dest = htons(dstport);
> bp->uh.len = htons(l4len);
> csum_udp4(&bp->uh, src, dst, bp->data, dlen);
>
> - tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l3len + sizeof(udp4_eth_hdr));
> return l4len;
> }
>
> /**
> * udp_update_hdr6() - Update headers for one IPv6 datagram
> * @c: Execution context
> - * @bm: Pointer to udp_meta_t to update
> + * @ip6h: Pre-filled IPv6 header (except for payload_len and addresses)
> + * @s_in: Source socket address, filled in by recvmmsg()
> * @bp: Pointer to udp_payload_t to update
> * @dstport: Destination port number
> * @dlen: Length of UDP payload
> @@ -620,13 +622,14 @@ static size_t udp_update_hdr4(const struct ctx *c,
> * Return: size of IPv6 payload (UDP header + data)
> */
> static size_t udp_update_hdr6(const struct ctx *c,
> - struct udp_meta_t *bm, struct udp_payload_t *bp,
> + struct ipv6hdr *ip6h, struct sockaddr_in6 *s_in6,
> + struct udp_payload_t *bp,
> in_port_t dstport, size_t dlen,
> const struct timespec *now)
> {
> - const struct in6_addr *src = &bm->s_in.sa6.sin6_addr;
> + const struct in6_addr *src = &s_in6->sin6_addr;
> const struct in6_addr *dst = &c->ip6.addr_seen;
> - in_port_t srcport = ntohs(bm->s_in.sa6.sin6_port);
> + in_port_t srcport = ntohs(s_in6->sin6_port);
Same here.
> uint16_t l4len = dlen + sizeof(bp->uh);
>
> if (IN6_IS_ADDR_LINKLOCAL(src)) {
> @@ -663,19 +666,18 @@ static size_t udp_update_hdr6(const struct ctx *c,
>
> }
>
> - bm->ip6h.payload_len = htons(l4len);
> - bm->ip6h.daddr = *dst;
> - bm->ip6h.saddr = *src;
> - bm->ip6h.version = 6;
> - bm->ip6h.nexthdr = IPPROTO_UDP;
> - bm->ip6h.hop_limit = 255;
> + ip6h->payload_len = htons(l4len);
> + ip6h->daddr = *dst;
> + ip6h->saddr = *src;
> + ip6h->version = 6;
> + ip6h->nexthdr = IPPROTO_UDP;
> + ip6h->hop_limit = 255;
>
> - bp->uh.source = bm->s_in.sa6.sin6_port;
> + bp->uh.source = s_in6->sin6_port;
> bp->uh.dest = htons(dstport);
> - bp->uh.len = bm->ip6h.payload_len;
> + bp->uh.len = ip6h->payload_len;
> csum_udp6(&bp->uh, src, dst, bp->data, dlen);
>
> - tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l4len + sizeof(bm->ip6h) + sizeof(udp6_eth_hdr));
> return l4len;
> }
>
> @@ -708,11 +710,17 @@ static void udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c,
> size_t l4len;
>
> if (v6) {
> - l4len = udp_update_hdr6(c, bm, bp, dstport,
> + l4len = udp_update_hdr6(c, &bm->ip6h,
> + &bm->s_in.sa6, bp, dstport,
> udp6_l2_mh_sock[i].msg_len, now);
> + tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l4len + sizeof(bm->ip6h) +
> + sizeof(udp6_eth_hdr));
You're summing sizeof(udp6_eth_hdr) to l4len + sizeof(bm->ip6h), so
this should be aligned as follows:
tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l4len + sizeof(bm->ip6h) +
sizeof(udp6_eth_hdr));
> } else {
> - l4len = udp_update_hdr4(c, bm, bp, dstport,
> + l4len = udp_update_hdr4(c, &bm->ip4h,
> + &bm->s_in.sa4, bp, dstport,
> udp4_l2_mh_sock[i].msg_len, now);
> + tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l4len + sizeof(bm->ip4h) +
> + sizeof(udp4_eth_hdr));
Same here:
tap_hdr_update(&bm->taph, l4len + sizeof(bm->ip4h) +
sizeof(udp4_eth_hdr));
> }
> tap_iov[i][UDP_IOV_PAYLOAD].iov_len = l4len;
> }
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-11 22:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-05 15:21 [PATCH v5 0/8] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 2) Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 1/8] tcp: extract buffer management from tcp_send_flag() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 5:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 11:42 ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:31 ` David Gibson
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:32 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 2/8] tcp: move buffers management functions to their own file Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:14 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 12:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:18 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 6:34 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 6:37 ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 6:21 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 4/8] udp: refactor UDP header update functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-06-12 6:27 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 5/8] udp: rename udp_sock_handler() to udp_buf_sock_handler() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 6:28 ` David Gibson
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 6/8] vhost-user: compare mode MODE_PASTA and not MODE_PASST Laurent Vivier
2024-06-11 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 7/8] iov: remove iov_copy() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-05 15:21 ` [PATCH v5 8/8] tap: use in->buf_size rather than sizeof(pkt_buf) Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240612001017.31692649@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).