public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/8] tcp: extract buffer management from tcp_send_flag()
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 08:07:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240613080719.67933d22@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612232210.3b1f975f@elisabeth>

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 23:22:10 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:

> I couldn't find out why this patch breaks the the pasta_podman/bats
> test, yet, that is:
> 
> not ok 19 [505] Single TCP port forwarding, IPv4, tap
> # (from function `bail-now' in file test/podman/test/system/helpers.bash, line 235,
> #  from function `assert' in file test/podman/test/system/helpers.bash, line 929,
> #  from function `pasta_test_do' in file test/podman/test/system/505-networking-pasta.bats, line 239,
> #  in test file test/podman/test/system/505-networking-pasta.bats, line 472)
> #   `pasta_test_do' failed
> #
> # [22:54:18.306131353] $ test/podman/bin/podman rm -t 0 --all --force --ignore
> #
> # [22:54:18.367462243] $ test/podman/bin/podman ps --all --external --format {{.ID}} {{.Names}}
> #
> # [22:54:18.394935392] $ test/podman/bin/podman images --all --format {{.Repository}}:{{.Tag}} {{.ID}}
> # [22:54:18.419773379] quay.io/libpod/testimage:20240123 1f6acd4c4a1d
> #
> # [22:54:19.246631856] $ test/podman/bin/podman info --format {{.Host.Pasta.Executable}}
> # [22:54:20.084392405] /home/sbrivio/passt/pasta
> #
> # [22:54:20.167980222] $ test/podman/bin/podman run --net=pasta -p [88.198.0.164]:5727:5727/tcp quay.io/libpod/testimage:20240123 sh -c for port in $(seq 5727 5727); do                              socat -u TCP4-LISTEN:${port},bind=[88.198.0.164] STDOUT &                          done; wait
> # [22:54:37.256040883] x2024/06/12 20:54:37 socat[3] E read(6, 0x7fe675cd6000, 8192): Connection reset by peer
> # #/vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
> # #|     FAIL: Mismatch between data sent and received
> # #| expected: = x
> # #|   actual:   x2024/06/12 20:54:37 socat\[3\] E read\(6\, 0x7fe675cd6000\, 8192\): Connection reset by peer
> # #\^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> meaning that the data transfer is actually fine, but we reset the
> connection instead of an orderly shutdown.
> 
> I found a few issues while looking for that:
> 
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 17:47:27 +0200
> Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > This commit isolates the internal data structure management used for storing
> > data (e.g., tcp4_l2_flags_iov[], tcp6_l2_flags_iov[], tcp4_flags_ip[],
> > tcp4_flags[], ...) from the tcp_send_flag() function. The extracted
> > functionality is relocated to a new function named tcp_fill_flag_header().
> > 
> > tcp_fill_flag_header() is now a generic function that accepts parameters such
> > as struct tcphdr and a data pointer. tcp_send_flag() utilizes this parameter to
> > pass memory pointers from tcp4_l2_flags_iov[] and tcp6_l2_flags_iov[].
> > 
> > This separation sets the stage for utilizing tcp_fill_flag_header() to
> > set the memory provided by the guest via vhost-user in future developments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > 
> > Notes:
> >     v6:
> >       - rename tcp_fill_flag_header() to tcp_prepare_flags()
> >       - set optlen to 0 in tcp_prepare_flags()
> >     
> >     v5:
> >       - use tcp_fill_flag_header() rather than tcp_fill_headers4() and
> >         tcp_fill_headers6().
> > 
> >  tcp.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> >  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
> > index dd8d46e08628..6800209d4122 100644
> > --- a/tcp.c
> > +++ b/tcp.c
> > @@ -1567,24 +1567,25 @@ static void tcp_update_seqack_from_tap(const struct ctx *c,
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > - * tcp_send_flag() - Send segment with flags to tap (no payload)
> > + * tcp_prepare_flags() - Prepare header for flags-only segment (no payload)
> >   * @c:		Execution context
> >   * @conn:	Connection pointer
> >   * @flags:	TCP flags: if not set, send segment only if ACK is due
> > + * @th:		TCP header to update
> > + * @data:	buffer to store TCP option
> > + * @optlen:	size of the TCP option buffer (output parameter)
> >   *
> > - * Return: negative error code on connection reset, 0 otherwise
> > + * Return: < 0 error code on connection reset,
> > + *	     0 if there is no flag to send
> > + *	     1 otherwise  
> 
> This is often called with if (tcp_send_flag(...)) or
> if (!tcp_send_flag(...)). Those need to be replaced with 
> if (tcp_send_flag(...) < 0) or if (tcp_send_flag(...) >= 0) in the
> callers.

Ah, no, sorry, you already took care of this in the new
tcp_send_flag(). Then there must be something else...

> >   */
> > -static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> > +static int tcp_prepare_flags(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn,
> > +			     int flags, struct tcphdr *th, char *data,
> > +			     size_t *optlen)
> >  {
> > -	struct tcp_flags_t *payload;
> >  	struct tcp_info tinfo = { 0 };
> >  	socklen_t sl = sizeof(tinfo);
> >  	int s = conn->sock;
> > -	size_t optlen = 0;
> > -	struct tcphdr *th;
> > -	struct iovec *iov;
> > -	size_t l4len;
> > -	char *data;
> >  
> >  	if (SEQ_GE(conn->seq_ack_to_tap, conn->seq_from_tap) &&
> >  	    !flags && conn->wnd_to_tap)
> > @@ -1606,20 +1607,11 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> >  	if (!tcp_update_seqack_wnd(c, conn, flags, &tinfo) && !flags)
> >  		return 0;
> >  
> > -	if (CONN_V4(conn))
> > -		iov = tcp4_l2_flags_iov[tcp4_flags_used++];
> > -	else
> > -		iov = tcp6_l2_flags_iov[tcp6_flags_used++];
> > -
> > -	payload = iov[TCP_IOV_PAYLOAD].iov_base;
> > -	th = &payload->th;
> > -	data = payload->opts;
> > -
> >  	if (flags & SYN) {
> >  		int mss;
> >  
> >  		/* Options: MSS, NOP and window scale (8 bytes) */
> > -		optlen = OPT_MSS_LEN + 1 + OPT_WS_LEN;
> > +		*optlen = OPT_MSS_LEN + 1 + OPT_WS_LEN;
> >  
> >  		*data++ = OPT_MSS;
> >  		*data++ = OPT_MSS_LEN;
> > @@ -1651,19 +1643,16 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> >  		*data++ = conn->ws_to_tap;
> >  	} else if (!(flags & RST)) {
> >  		flags |= ACK;
> > +		*optlen = 0;  
> 
> *optlen also needs to be set to 0 if (flags & RST), say:
> 
> 	} else {
> 		*optlen = 0;
> 
> 		if (!(flags & RST))
> 			flags |= ACK;
> 	}
> 
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	th->doff = (sizeof(*th) + optlen) / 4;
> > +	th->doff = (sizeof(*th) + *optlen) / 4;
> >  
> >  	th->ack = !!(flags & ACK);
> >  	th->rst = !!(flags & RST);
> >  	th->syn = !!(flags & SYN);
> >  	th->fin = !!(flags & FIN);
> >  
> > -	l4len = tcp_l2_buf_fill_headers(c, conn, iov, optlen, NULL,
> > -					conn->seq_to_tap);
> > -	iov[TCP_IOV_PAYLOAD].iov_len = l4len;
> > -
> >  	if (th->ack) {
> >  		if (SEQ_GE(conn->seq_ack_to_tap, conn->seq_from_tap))
> >  			conn_flag(c, conn, ~ACK_TO_TAP_DUE);
> > @@ -1678,6 +1667,41 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> >  	if (th->fin || th->syn)
> >  		conn->seq_to_tap++;
> >  
> > +	return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * tcp_send_flag() - Send segment with flags to tap (no payload)
> > + * @c:         Execution context
> > + * @conn:      Connection pointer
> > + * @flags:     TCP flags: if not set, send segment only if ACK is due
> > + *
> > + * Return: negative error code on connection reset, 0 otherwise
> > + */
> > +static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> > +{
> > +	struct tcp_flags_t *payload;
> > +	struct iovec *iov;
> > +	size_t optlen;
> > +	size_t l4len;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (CONN_V4(conn))
> > +		iov = tcp4_l2_flags_iov[tcp4_flags_used++];
> > +	else
> > +		iov = tcp6_l2_flags_iov[tcp6_flags_used++];  
> 
> We increase the counters here, but we don't decrease them back if we
> hit if (ret <= 0) return ret; later.
> 
> > +
> > +	payload = iov[TCP_IOV_PAYLOAD].iov_base;
> > +
> > +	ret = tcp_prepare_flags(c, conn, flags, &payload->th,
> > +				payload->opts, &optlen);
> > +	if (ret <= 0)
> > +		return ret;
> > +
> > +	l4len = tcp_l2_buf_fill_headers(c, conn, iov, optlen, NULL,
> > +					conn->seq_to_tap);
> > +	iov[TCP_IOV_PAYLOAD].iov_len = l4len;
> > +
> >  	if (flags & DUP_ACK) {
> >  		struct iovec *dup_iov;
> >  		int i;  
> 
> Here's the diff I have so far, I'm not necessarily recommending any of
> that, it was just a quick try:
> 
> diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
> index 6800209..6bff6bc 100644
> --- a/tcp.c
> +++ b/tcp.c
> @@ -1644,6 +1644,8 @@ static int tcp_prepare_flags(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn,
>  	} else if (!(flags & RST)) {
>  		flags |= ACK;
>  		*optlen = 0;
> +	} else {
> +		*optlen = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	th->doff = (sizeof(*th) + *optlen) / 4;
> @@ -1695,8 +1697,14 @@ static int tcp_send_flag(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
>  
>  	ret = tcp_prepare_flags(c, conn, flags, &payload->th,
>  				payload->opts, &optlen);
> -	if (ret <= 0)
> +	if (ret <= 0) {
> +		if (CONN_V4(conn))
> +			tcp4_flags_used--;
> +		else
> +			tcp6_flags_used--;
> +
>  		return ret;
> +	}
>  
>  	l4len = tcp_l2_buf_fill_headers(c, conn, iov, optlen, NULL,
>  					conn->seq_to_tap);
> @@ -1738,7 +1746,7 @@ static void tcp_rst_do(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn)
>  	if (conn->events == CLOSED)
>  		return;
>  
> -	if (!tcp_send_flag(c, conn, RST))
> +	if (tcp_send_flag(c, conn, RST) >= 0)
>  		conn_event(c, conn, CLOSED);
>  }
>  
> @@ -2111,7 +2119,7 @@ static void tcp_conn_from_tap(struct ctx *c, sa_family_t af,
>  	} else {
>  		tcp_get_sndbuf(conn);
>  
> -		if (tcp_send_flag(c, conn, SYN | ACK))
> +		if (tcp_send_flag(c, conn, SYN | ACK) < 0)
>  			goto cancel;
>  
>  		conn_event(c, conn, TAP_SYN_ACK_SENT);
> @@ -2282,9 +2290,11 @@ static int tcp_data_from_sock(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn)
>  
>  	if (!len) {
>  		if ((conn->events & (SOCK_FIN_RCVD | TAP_FIN_SENT)) == SOCK_FIN_RCVD) {
> -			if ((ret = tcp_send_flag(c, conn, FIN | ACK))) {
> +			int rc = tcp_send_flag(c, conn, FIN | ACK);
> +
> +			if (rc < 0) {
>  				tcp_rst(c, conn);
> -				return ret;
> +				return rc;
>  			}
>  
>  			conn_event(c, conn, TAP_FIN_SENT);
> @@ -2716,7 +2726,7 @@ static void tcp_connect_finish(struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn)
>  		return;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (tcp_send_flag(c, conn, SYN | ACK))
> +	if (tcp_send_flag(c, conn, SYN | ACK) < 0)
>  		return;
>  
>  	conn_event(c, conn, TAP_SYN_ACK_SENT);
> 

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-13  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-12 15:47 [PATCH v6 0/8] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 2) Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] tcp: extract buffer management from tcp_send_flag() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 21:22   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-13  6:07     ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-06-13  8:24       ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-13 10:14         ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-13 10:22           ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-13 10:49             ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-13 10:58               ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-13  7:31     ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-13  9:35       ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-13 14:36         ` David Gibson
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] tcp: move buffers management functions to their own file Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:54   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] tap: refactor packets handling functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:52   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 16:00     ` Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] udp: refactor UDP header update functions Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] udp: rename udp_sock_handler() to udp_buf_sock_handler() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] vhost-user: compare mode MODE_PASTA and not MODE_PASST Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] iov: remove iov_copy() Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 15:47 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] tap: use in->buf_size rather than sizeof(pkt_buf) Laurent Vivier
2024-06-12 17:16 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] Add vhost-user support to passt (part 2) Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 17:37   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-06-12 21:23     ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240613080719.67933d22@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).