From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] udp: Pass full epoll reference through more of sock handler path
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2024 23:20:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240704232007.0aa0cbe5@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240704045835.1149746-4-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 14:58:27 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> udp_buf_sock_handler() takes the epoll reference from the receiving socket,
> and passes the UDP relevant part on to several other functions. Future
> changes are going to need several different epoll types for UDP, and to
> pass that information through to some of those functions. To avoid extra
> noise in the patches making the real changes, change those functions now
> to take the full epoll reference, rather than just the UDP part.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> udp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
> index eadf4872..6301bda2 100644
> --- a/udp.c
> +++ b/udp.c
> @@ -477,25 +477,26 @@ static int udp_splice_new_ns(void *arg)
>
> /**
> * udp_mmh_splice_port() - Is source address of message suitable for splicing?
> - * @uref: UDP epoll reference for incoming message's origin socket
> + * @ref: Epoll reference for incoming message's origin socket
Nit: in 1/11 (and later in this patch), this is "epoll" instead, which
looks more correct to me as it's a proper noun, but not capitalised.
Same for udp_update_hdr6().
> * @mmh: mmsghdr of incoming message
> *
> * Return: if source address of message in @mmh refers to localhost (127.0.0.1
> * or ::1) its source port (host order), otherwise -1.
> */
> -static int udp_mmh_splice_port(union udp_epoll_ref uref,
> - const struct mmsghdr *mmh)
> +static int udp_mmh_splice_port(union epoll_ref ref, const struct mmsghdr *mmh)
> {
> const struct sockaddr_in6 *sa6 = mmh->msg_hdr.msg_name;
> const struct sockaddr_in *sa4 = mmh->msg_hdr.msg_name;
>
> - if (!uref.splice)
> + ASSERT(ref.type == EPOLL_TYPE_UDP);
> +
> + if (!ref.udp.splice)
> return -1;
>
> - if (uref.v6 && IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa6->sin6_addr))
> + if (ref.udp.v6 && IN6_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa6->sin6_addr))
> return ntohs(sa6->sin6_port);
>
> - if (!uref.v6 && IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa4->sin_addr))
> + if (!ref.udp.v6 && IN4_IS_ADDR_LOOPBACK(&sa4->sin_addr))
> return ntohs(sa4->sin_port);
>
> return -1;
> @@ -507,7 +508,7 @@ static int udp_mmh_splice_port(union udp_epoll_ref uref,
> * @start: Index of first datagram in udp[46]_l2_buf
> * @n: Total number of datagrams in udp[46]_l2_buf pool
> * @dst: Datagrams will be sent to this port (on destination side)
> - * @uref: UDP epoll reference for origin socket
> + * @ref: epoll reference for origin socket
> * @now: Timestamp
> *
> * This consumes as many datagrams as are sendable via a single socket. It
> @@ -518,7 +519,7 @@ static int udp_mmh_splice_port(union udp_epoll_ref uref,
> * Return: Number of datagrams forwarded
> */
> static unsigned udp_splice_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> - in_port_t dst, union udp_epoll_ref uref,
> + in_port_t dst, union epoll_ref ref,
> const struct timespec *now)
> {
> in_port_t src = udp_meta[start].splicesrc;
> @@ -527,8 +528,9 @@ static unsigned udp_splice_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> int s;
>
> ASSERT(udp_meta[start].splicesrc >= 0);
> + ASSERT(ref.type == EPOLL_TYPE_UDP);
>
> - if (uref.v6) {
> + if (ref.udp.v6) {
> mmh_recv = udp6_l2_mh_sock;
> mmh_send = udp6_mh_splice;
> udp6_localname.sin6_port = htons(dst);
> @@ -544,27 +546,27 @@ static unsigned udp_splice_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> if (++i >= n)
> break;
>
> - udp_meta[i].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(uref, &mmh_recv[i]);
> + udp_meta[i].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(ref, &mmh_recv[i]);
> } while (udp_meta[i].splicesrc == src);
>
> - if (uref.pif == PIF_SPLICE) {
> + if (ref.udp.pif == PIF_SPLICE) {
> src += c->udp.fwd_in.rdelta[src];
> - s = udp_splice_init[uref.v6][src].sock;
> - if (s < 0 && uref.orig)
> - s = udp_splice_new(c, uref.v6, src, false);
> + s = udp_splice_init[ref.udp.v6][src].sock;
> + if (s < 0 && ref.udp.orig)
> + s = udp_splice_new(c, ref.udp.v6, src, false);
>
> if (s < 0)
> goto out;
>
> - udp_splice_ns[uref.v6][dst].ts = now->tv_sec;
> - udp_splice_init[uref.v6][src].ts = now->tv_sec;
> + udp_splice_ns[ref.udp.v6][dst].ts = now->tv_sec;
> + udp_splice_init[ref.udp.v6][src].ts = now->tv_sec;
> } else {
> - ASSERT(uref.pif == PIF_HOST);
> + ASSERT(ref.udp.pif == PIF_HOST);
> src += c->udp.fwd_out.rdelta[src];
> - s = udp_splice_ns[uref.v6][src].sock;
> - if (s < 0 && uref.orig) {
> + s = udp_splice_ns[ref.udp.v6][src].sock;
> + if (s < 0 && ref.udp.orig) {
> struct udp_splice_new_ns_arg arg = {
> - c, uref.v6, src, -1,
> + c, ref.udp.v6, src, -1,
> };
>
> NS_CALL(udp_splice_new_ns, &arg);
> @@ -573,8 +575,8 @@ static unsigned udp_splice_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> if (s < 0)
> goto out;
>
> - udp_splice_init[uref.v6][dst].ts = now->tv_sec;
> - udp_splice_ns[uref.v6][src].ts = now->tv_sec;
> + udp_splice_init[ref.udp.v6][dst].ts = now->tv_sec;
> + udp_splice_ns[ref.udp.v6][src].ts = now->tv_sec;
> }
>
> sendmmsg(s, mmh_send + start, i - start, MSG_NOSIGNAL);
> @@ -716,7 +718,7 @@ static size_t udp_update_hdr6(const struct ctx *c,
> * @start: Index of first datagram in udp[46]_l2_buf pool
> * @n: Total number of datagrams in udp[46]_l2_buf pool
> * @dstport: Destination port number on destination side
> - * @uref: UDP epoll reference for origin socket
> + * @ref: Epoll reference for origin socket
> * @now: Current timestamp
> *
> * This consumes as many frames as are sendable via tap. It requires that
> @@ -726,7 +728,7 @@ static size_t udp_update_hdr6(const struct ctx *c,
> * Return: Number of frames sent via tap
> */
> static unsigned udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> - in_port_t dstport, union udp_epoll_ref uref,
> + in_port_t dstport, union epoll_ref ref,
> const struct timespec *now)
> {
> struct iovec (*tap_iov)[UDP_NUM_IOVS];
> @@ -734,8 +736,9 @@ static unsigned udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> size_t i = start;
>
> ASSERT(udp_meta[start].splicesrc == -1);
> + ASSERT(ref.type == EPOLL_TYPE_UDP);
>
> - if (uref.v6) {
> + if (ref.udp.v6) {
> tap_iov = udp6_l2_iov_tap;
> mmh_recv = udp6_l2_mh_sock;
> } else {
> @@ -748,7 +751,7 @@ static unsigned udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> struct udp_meta_t *bm = &udp_meta[i];
> size_t l4len;
>
> - if (uref.v6) {
> + if (ref.udp.v6) {
> l4len = udp_update_hdr6(c, &bm->ip6h,
> &bm->s_in.sa6, bp, dstport,
> udp6_l2_mh_sock[i].msg_len, now);
> @@ -766,7 +769,7 @@ static unsigned udp_tap_send(const struct ctx *c, size_t start, size_t n,
> if (++i >= n)
> break;
>
> - udp_meta[i].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(uref, &mmh_recv[i]);
> + udp_meta[i].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(ref, &mmh_recv[i]);
> } while (udp_meta[i].splicesrc == -1);
>
> tap_send_frames(c, &tap_iov[start][0], UDP_NUM_IOVS, i - start);
> @@ -823,12 +826,12 @@ void udp_buf_sock_handler(const struct ctx *c, union epoll_ref ref, uint32_t eve
> * present). So we fill in entry 0 before the loop, then udp_*_send()
> * populate one entry past where they consume.
> */
> - udp_meta[0].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(ref.udp, mmh_recv);
> + udp_meta[0].splicesrc = udp_mmh_splice_port(ref, mmh_recv);
> for (i = 0; i < n; i += m) {
> if (udp_meta[i].splicesrc >= 0)
> - m = udp_splice_send(c, i, n, dstport, ref.udp, now);
> + m = udp_splice_send(c, i, n, dstport, ref, now);
> else
> - m = udp_tap_send(c, i, n, dstport, ref.udp, now);
> + m = udp_tap_send(c, i, n, dstport, ref, now);
> }
> }
>
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-04 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-04 4:58 [PATCH 00/11] Preliminaries for UDP flow support David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 01/11] util: sock_l4() determine protocol from epoll type rather than the reverse David Gibson
2024-07-04 21:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-07-04 23:51 ` David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 02/11] flow: Add flow_sidx_valid() helper David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 03/11] udp: Pass full epoll reference through more of sock handler path David Gibson
2024-07-04 21:20 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-07-04 23:54 ` David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 04/11] udp: Rename IOV and mmsghdr arrays David Gibson
2024-07-04 21:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-07-05 0:00 ` David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 05/11] udp: Unify udp[46]_mh_splice David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 06/11] udp: Unify udp[46]_l2_iov David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 07/11] udp: Don't repeatedly initialise udp[46]_eth_hdr David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 08/11] udp: Move some more of sock_handler tasks into sub-functions David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 09/11] udp: Consolidate datagram batching David Gibson
2024-07-05 9:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-07-05 9:36 ` David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 10/11] contrib: Add program to document and test assumptions about SO_REUSEADDR David Gibson
2024-07-04 21:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-07-05 0:06 ` David Gibson
2024-07-05 8:33 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-07-05 9:49 ` David Gibson
2024-07-04 4:58 ` [PATCH 11/11] contrib: Test behaviour of zero length datagram recv()s David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240704232007.0aa0cbe5@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).