From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tcp: probe for SO_PEEK_OFF both in tcpv4 and tcp6
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 22:29:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240723222936.1c301d30@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240722220937.3663437-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
On Tue, 23 Jul 2024 00:09:37 +0200
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:
> From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
>
> Based on an original patch by Jon Maloy:
>
> --
> The recently added socket option SO_PEEK_OFF is not supported for
> TCP/IPv6 sockets. Until we get that support into the kernel we need to
> test for support in both protocols to set the global 'peek_offset_cap´
> to true.
> --
>
> Compared to the original patch:
> - only check for SO_PEEK_OFF support for enabled IP versions
> - use sa_family_t instead of int to pass the address family around
>
> Fixes: e63d281871ef ("tcp: leverage support of SO_PEEK_OFF socket option when available")
...so, with this, the probing issue is solved: on a 6.10 kernel,
SO_PEEK_OFF is not used, unless I disable IPv6 (with --ipv4-only / -4).
However, if I disable it, for some reason, resorting to IPv4, at least
together with the flow table (applying just this patch to HEAD), I get
something that looks like one of the "old" TCP stalls. On the host:
$ ./passt -f -t 10000 -4
and in the guest:
# ip link set dev eth0 up
# dhclient eth0
# iperf3 -s -p 10000
back to the host:
$ iperf3 -c 127.0.0.1 -p 10000
Connecting to host 127.0.0.1, port 10000
[ 5] local 127.0.0.1 port 39046 connected to 127.0.0.1 port 10000
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bitrate Retr Cwnd
[ 5] 0.00-1.00 sec 11.2 MBytes 94.3 Mbits/sec 0 5.50 MBytes
[ 5] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 5.50 MBytes
[ 5] 2.00-3.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec 0 5.50 MBytes
...the transfer never recovers.
I didn't really have time to debug this further.
At the moment I would be inclined to temporarily revert commit
e63d281871ef ("tcp: leverage support of SO_PEEK_OFF socket option when
available"), but it's not a good idea if this happens to be hiding some
(unlikely?) issue with the flow table.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-22 22:09 [PATCH v2] tcp: probe for SO_PEEK_OFF both in tcpv4 and tcp6 Stefano Brivio
2024-07-23 6:57 ` David Gibson
2024-07-23 20:29 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-07-24 0:40 ` David Gibson
2024-07-24 3:31 ` David Gibson
2024-07-24 7:29 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240723222936.1c301d30@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).