From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: passt.top; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: passt.top; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=R8DuKneh; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by passt.top (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B6F75A0262 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 21:49:45 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1724701784; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Idv2v9Jm8gc4PffZ6VpAxuYQtppWCkzIJzIQJAInlCY=; b=R8DuKnehTchiBot7LMoATtIJpHmyP8Vqy8ZklgIjkX5UyzhnGlCTlKxhT68hgl3bj58THH r7CXZHrxXifqq2j0y8DKyC9z149YrjWTwgRRv+tSxnmUf5umUuQ2nxr79+4lm6HoNIWJrq wdeCYS2KFRTj4QR/LgYmsJWBZ0CRzBI= Received: from mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-605-WYv3nM5VNPGXGZ87v_HvIw-1; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:49:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: WYv3nM5VNPGXGZ87v_HvIw-1 Received: from mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.12]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-05.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9900C1955F08; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:49:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jmaloy-thinkpadp16vgen1.rmtcaqc.csb (unknown [10.22.8.17]) by mx-prod-int-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0458D19560AA; Mon, 26 Aug 2024 19:49:36 +0000 (UTC) From: jmaloy@redhat.com To: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: [net-next, v2 1/2] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6 Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2024 15:49:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20240826194932.420992-2-jmaloy@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240826194932.420992-1-jmaloy@redhat.com> References: <20240826194932.420992-1-jmaloy@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.12 Message-ID-Hash: IWE3JJAHFDE6KFITK7IH4UANH5PH7R5G X-Message-ID-Hash: IWE3JJAHFDE6KFITK7IH4UANH5PH7R5G X-MailFrom: jmaloy@redhat.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: kuba@kernel.org, passt-dev@passt.top, jmaloy@redhat.com, sbrivio@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion and patches for passt Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: From: Jon Maloy When we added the SO_PEEK_OFF socket option to TCP we forgot to add it even for TCP on IPv6. We do that here. Fixes: 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option") Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet Reviewed-by: David Gibson Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio Tested-by: Stefano Brivio Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy --- net/ipv6/af_inet6.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c index 90d2c7e3f5e9..ba69b86f1c7d 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c +++ b/net/ipv6/af_inet6.c @@ -708,6 +708,7 @@ const struct proto_ops inet6_stream_ops = { .splice_eof = inet_splice_eof, .sendmsg_locked = tcp_sendmsg_locked, .splice_read = tcp_splice_read, + .set_peek_off = sk_set_peek_off, .read_sock = tcp_read_sock, .read_skb = tcp_read_skb, .peek_len = tcp_peek_len, -- 2.45.2