From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] tap: Restructure in tap_pasta_input()
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 21:25:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240903212542.4934f5a6@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240903120235.1688429-4-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 22:02:32 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> tap_pasta_input() has a rather confusing structure, using two gotos.
> Remove these by restructuring the function to have the main loop condition
> based on filling our buffer space, with errors or running out of data
> treated as the exception, rather than the other way around. This allows
> us to handle the EINTR which triggered the 'restart' goto with a continue.
>
> The outer 'redo' was triggered if we completely filled our buffer, to flush
> it and do another pass. This one is unnecessary since we don't (yet) use
> EPOLLET on the tap device: if there's still more data we'll get another
> event and re-enter the loop.
>
> Along the way handle a couple of extra edge cases:
> - Check for EWOULDBLOCK as well as EAGAIN for the benefit of any future
> ports where those might not have the same value
> - Detect EOF on the tap device and exit in that case
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> tap.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index 9ee59faa..71742748 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -1073,42 +1073,34 @@ void tap_handler_passt(struct ctx *c, uint32_t events,
> static void tap_pasta_input(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now)
> {
> ssize_t n, len;
> - int ret;
> -
> -redo:
> - n = 0;
>
> tap_flush_pools();
> -restart:
> - while ((len = read(c->fd_tap, pkt_buf + n, TAP_BUF_BYTES - n)) > 0) {
>
> - if (len < (ssize_t)sizeof(struct ethhdr) ||
> - len > (ssize_t)ETH_MAX_MTU) {
> - n += len;
> - continue;
> + for (n = 0; n < (ssize_t)TAP_BUF_BYTES; n += len) {
> + len = read(c->fd_tap, pkt_buf + n, TAP_BUF_BYTES - n);
> +
> + if (len <= 0) {
> + if (errno == EINTR) {
You might be checking errno when read() returns 0, in which case it's
not set. I guess you should zero out errno before read() if you want to
keep this, or, alternatively, directly handle len == 0 here.
> + len = 0;
> + continue;
> + }
> + break;
> }
>
> + /* Ignore frames of bad length */
> + if (len < (ssize_t)sizeof(struct ethhdr) ||
> + len > (ssize_t)ETH_MAX_MTU)
> + continue;
>
> tap_add_packet(c, len, pkt_buf + n);
> -
> - if ((n += len) == TAP_BUF_BYTES)
> - break;
> }
>
> - if (len < 0 && errno == EINTR)
> - goto restart;
> -
> - ret = errno;
> + if (len < 0 && errno != EAGAIN && errno != EWOULDBLOCK)
> + die("Error on tap device, exiting");
> + else if (len == 0)
> + die("EOF on tap device, exiting");
>
> tap_handler(c, now);
> -
> - if (len > 0 || ret == EAGAIN)
> - return;
> -
> - if (n == TAP_BUF_BYTES)
> - goto redo;
> -
> - die("Error on tap device, exiting");
> }
>
> /**
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-03 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-03 12:02 [PATCH 0/6] RFC: Clean up tap-side event handling David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] tap: Split out handling of EPOLLIN events David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-04 1:17 ` David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] tap: Improve handling of EINTR in tap_passt_input() David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-04 1:30 ` David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] tap: Restructure in tap_pasta_input() David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-09-04 1:33 ` David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] tap: Don't risk truncating frames on full buffer " David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-04 1:33 ` David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] tap: Re-introduce EPOLLET for tap connections David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-04 1:36 ` David Gibson
2024-09-03 12:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] tap: Stub EPOLLOUT handling David Gibson
2024-09-03 19:25 ` [PATCH 0/6] RFC: Clean up tap-side event handling Stefano Brivio
2024-09-04 3:17 ` David Gibson
2024-09-04 17:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-05 0:35 ` David Gibson
2024-09-05 8:32 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-09-05 11:33 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240903212542.4934f5a6@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).