From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>,
Tim Besard <tim.besard@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tcp: Reset ACK_TO_TAP_DUE flag whenever an ACK isn't needed anymore
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 20:53:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119195344.3056010-2-sbrivio@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241119195344.3056010-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
We enter the timer handler with the ACK_TO_TAP_DUE flag, call
tcp_prepare_flags() with ACK_IF_NEEDED, and realise that we
acknowledged everything meanwhile, so we return early, but we also
need to reset that flag to avoid unnecessarily scheduling the timer
over and over again until more pending data appears.
I'm not sure if this fixes any real issue, but I've spotted this
in several logs reported by users, including one where we have some
unexpected bursts of high CPU load during TCP transfers at low rates,
from https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/23686.
Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/24572
Link: https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/23686
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
---
tcp.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
index 6a98dfa..f357920 100644
--- a/tcp.c
+++ b/tcp.c
@@ -1235,8 +1235,10 @@ int tcp_prepare_flags(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn,
int s = conn->sock;
if (SEQ_GE(conn->seq_ack_to_tap, conn->seq_from_tap) &&
- !flags && conn->wnd_to_tap)
+ !flags && conn->wnd_to_tap) {
+ conn_flag(c, conn, ~ACK_TO_TAP_DUE);
return 0;
+ }
if (getsockopt(s, SOL_TCP, TCP_INFO, &tinfo, &sl)) {
conn_event(c, conn, CLOSED);
--
@@ -1235,8 +1235,10 @@ int tcp_prepare_flags(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn,
int s = conn->sock;
if (SEQ_GE(conn->seq_ack_to_tap, conn->seq_from_tap) &&
- !flags && conn->wnd_to_tap)
+ !flags && conn->wnd_to_tap) {
+ conn_flag(c, conn, ~ACK_TO_TAP_DUE);
return 0;
+ }
if (getsockopt(s, SOL_TCP, TCP_INFO, &tinfo, &sl)) {
conn_event(c, conn, CLOSED);
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-19 19:53 [PATCH 0/2] tcp: Handle keep-alives, avoid unnecessary timer scheduling Stefano Brivio
2024-11-19 19:53 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-11-20 0:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] tcp: Reset ACK_TO_TAP_DUE flag whenever an ACK isn't needed anymore David Gibson
2024-11-19 19:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] tcp: Acknowledge keep-alive segments, ignore them for the rest Stefano Brivio
2024-11-20 1:02 ` David Gibson
2024-11-20 6:43 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-21 2:38 ` David Gibson
2024-11-21 4:26 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-21 4:30 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-21 6:21 ` David Gibson
2024-11-21 9:23 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-21 9:32 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241119195344.3056010-2-sbrivio@redhat.com \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=tim.besard@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).