public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: Don't require 64-bit prefixes in perf tests
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119214344.6b4a5b3a@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106014415.1765896-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Wed,  6 Nov 2024 12:44:14 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> When determining the namespace's IPv6 address in the perf test setup, we
> explicitly filter for addresses with a 64-bit prefix length.  There's no
> real reason we need that - as long as it's a global address we can use it.
> I suspect this was copied without thinking from a similar example in the
> NDP tests, where the 64-bit prefix length _is_ meaningful (though it's not
> entirely clear if the handling is correct there either).

So, I'm not sure why we had those filters, I also suspect a copy and
past, but:

> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
>  test/perf/pasta_tcp | 2 +-
>  test/perf/pasta_udp | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/test/perf/pasta_tcp b/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> index d1ccf7d..88284b2 100644
> --- a/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> +++ b/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ tr	TCP throughput over IPv6: host to ns
>  iperf3s	ns 10002
>  
>  nsout	IFNAME ip -j link show | jq -rM '.[] | select(.link_type == "ether").ifname'
> -nsout	ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global" and .prefixlen == 64).local'
> +nsout	ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'
>  bw	-
>  bw	-
>  bw	-
> diff --git a/test/perf/pasta_udp b/test/perf/pasta_udp
> index 544bf17..3d07091 100644
> --- a/test/perf/pasta_udp
> +++ b/test/perf/pasta_udp
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ tr	UDP throughput over IPv6: host to ns
>  iperf3s	ns 10002
>  
>  nsout	IFNAME ip -j link show | jq -rM '.[] | select(.link_type == "ether").ifname'
> -nsout	ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global" and .prefixlen == 64).local'
> +nsout	ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'

...these cause failures on a "typical" pasta-in-passt-in-passt setup,
because in the guest we typically have two addresses, one assigned via
SLAAC, and one assigned via DHCPv6, say:

    inet6 2a01:4f8:222:904::2/128 scope global noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
    inet6 2a01:4f8:222:904:5054:ff:fe7c:cea1/64 scope global mngtmpaddr noprefixroute 
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

and, whoops:

ns$ ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "ens3").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'
2a01:4f8:222:904:5054:ff:fe7c:cea1
2a01:4f8:222:904::2

I guess we should come up with a jq expression selecting the longest
prefix. Any address will do, but it's probably better to keep this
consistent. On the subject, see also:

  https://github.com/siderolabs/talos/issues/9725#issuecomment-2478509622

...or should we just pick the first one as we do elsewhere?

-- 
Stefano


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-19 20:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-06  1:44 [PATCH 0/2] test: Fixes for prefixlen handling David Gibson
2024-11-06  1:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] test: Don't require 64-bit prefixes in perf tests David Gibson
2024-11-19 20:43   ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-11-06  1:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] test: Improve test for NDP assigned prefix David Gibson
2024-11-08  9:33   ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-07 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] test: Fixes for prefixlen handling Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241119214344.6b4a5b3a@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).