From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] test: Don't require 64-bit prefixes in perf tests
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 21:43:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241119214344.6b4a5b3a@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241106014415.1765896-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 12:44:14 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> When determining the namespace's IPv6 address in the perf test setup, we
> explicitly filter for addresses with a 64-bit prefix length. There's no
> real reason we need that - as long as it's a global address we can use it.
> I suspect this was copied without thinking from a similar example in the
> NDP tests, where the 64-bit prefix length _is_ meaningful (though it's not
> entirely clear if the handling is correct there either).
So, I'm not sure why we had those filters, I also suspect a copy and
past, but:
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> test/perf/pasta_tcp | 2 +-
> test/perf/pasta_udp | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/perf/pasta_tcp b/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> index d1ccf7d..88284b2 100644
> --- a/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> +++ b/test/perf/pasta_tcp
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ tr TCP throughput over IPv6: host to ns
> iperf3s ns 10002
>
> nsout IFNAME ip -j link show | jq -rM '.[] | select(.link_type == "ether").ifname'
> -nsout ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global" and .prefixlen == 64).local'
> +nsout ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'
> bw -
> bw -
> bw -
> diff --git a/test/perf/pasta_udp b/test/perf/pasta_udp
> index 544bf17..3d07091 100644
> --- a/test/perf/pasta_udp
> +++ b/test/perf/pasta_udp
> @@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ tr UDP throughput over IPv6: host to ns
> iperf3s ns 10002
>
> nsout IFNAME ip -j link show | jq -rM '.[] | select(.link_type == "ether").ifname'
> -nsout ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global" and .prefixlen == 64).local'
> +nsout ADDR6 ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "__IFNAME__").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'
...these cause failures on a "typical" pasta-in-passt-in-passt setup,
because in the guest we typically have two addresses, one assigned via
SLAAC, and one assigned via DHCPv6, say:
inet6 2a01:4f8:222:904::2/128 scope global noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
inet6 2a01:4f8:222:904:5054:ff:fe7c:cea1/64 scope global mngtmpaddr noprefixroute
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
and, whoops:
ns$ ip -j -6 addr show|jq -rM '.[] | select(.ifname == "ens3").addr_info[] | select(.scope == "global").local'
2a01:4f8:222:904:5054:ff:fe7c:cea1
2a01:4f8:222:904::2
I guess we should come up with a jq expression selecting the longest
prefix. Any address will do, but it's probably better to keep this
consistent. On the subject, see also:
https://github.com/siderolabs/talos/issues/9725#issuecomment-2478509622
...or should we just pick the first one as we do elsewhere?
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-19 20:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-06 1:44 [PATCH 0/2] test: Fixes for prefixlen handling David Gibson
2024-11-06 1:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] test: Don't require 64-bit prefixes in perf tests David Gibson
2024-11-19 20:43 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2024-11-06 1:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] test: Improve test for NDP assigned prefix David Gibson
2024-11-08 9:33 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-11-07 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/2] test: Fixes for prefixlen handling Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241119214344.6b4a5b3a@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).