Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dhcp: Use -1 as "missing option" length instead of 0

[Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:34:08 +0100
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:

> We want to add support for option 80 (Rapid Commit, RFC 4039), whose
> length is 0.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
>  dhcp.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dhcp.c b/dhcp.c
> index a06f143..387aee3 100644
> --- a/dhcp.c
> +++ b/dhcp.c
> @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@
>  /**
>   * struct opt - DHCP option
>   * @sent:	Convenience flag, set while filling replies
> - * @slen:	Length of option defined for server
> + * @slen:	Length of option defined for server, -1 if not going to be sent
>   * @s:		Option payload from server
> - * @clen:	Length of option received from client
> + * @clen:	Length of option received from client, -1 if not received
>   * @c:		Option payload from client
>   */
>  struct opt {
> @@ -68,6 +68,11 @@ static struct opt opts[255];
>   */
>  void dhcp_init(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opts); i++)
> +		opts[i].slen = -1;
> +
>  	opts[1]  = (struct opt) { 0, 4, {     0 }, 0, { 0 }, };	/* Mask */
>  	opts[3]  = (struct opt) { 0, 4, {     0 }, 0, { 0 }, };	/* Router */
>  	opts[51] = (struct opt) { 0, 4, {  0xff,
> @@ -154,17 +159,17 @@ static int fill(struct msg *m)
>  	 * option 53 at the beginning of the list.
>  	 * Put it there explicitly, unless requested via option 55.
>  	 */
> -	if (!memchr(opts[55].c, 53, opts[55].clen))
> +	if (opts[55].clen > 0 && !memchr(opts[55].c, 53, opts[55].clen))
>  		fill_one(m, 53, &offset);
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < opts[55].clen; i++) {
>  		o = opts[55].c[i];
> -		if (opts[o].slen)
> +		if (opts[o].slen != -1)
>  			fill_one(m, o, &offset);
>  	}
>  
>  	for (o = 0; o < 255; o++) {
> -		if (opts[o].slen && !opts[o].sent)
> +		if (opts[o].slen != -1 && !opts[o].sent)
>  			fill_one(m, o, &offset);
>  	}
>  
> @@ -264,6 +269,9 @@ static void opt_set_dns_search(const struct ctx *c, size_t max_len)
>  						 ".\xc0");
>  		}
>  	}
> +
> +	if (!opts[119].slen)
> +		opts[119].slen = -1;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -313,6 +321,9 @@ int dhcp(const struct ctx *c, const struct pool *p)
>  
>  	offset += offsetof(struct msg, o);
>  
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opts); i++)
> +		opts[i].clen = -1;
> +
>  	while (opt_off + 2 < opt_len) {
>  		const uint8_t *olen, *val;
>  		uint8_t *type;
> @@ -331,11 +342,12 @@ int dhcp(const struct ctx *c, const struct pool *p)
>  		opt_off += *olen + 2;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (opts[53].c[0] == DHCPDISCOVER) {
> +	if (opts[53].clen > 0 && opts[53].c[0] == DHCPDISCOVER) {
>  		info("DHCP: offer to discover");
>  		opts[53].s[0] = DHCPOFFER;
> -	} else if (opts[53].c[0] == DHCPREQUEST || !opts[53].clen) {
> -		info("%s: ack to request", opts[53].clen ? "DHCP" : "BOOTP");
> +	} else if (opts[53].clen <= 0 || opts[53].c[0] == DHCPREQUEST) {
> +		info("%s: ack to request", /* DHCP needs a valid message type */
> +		     (opts[53].clen <= 0) ? "BOOTP" : "DHCP");

Oops, posted before tests completed, this is broken again...

-- 
Stefano