From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: Set PSH flag for last incoming packets in a batch
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:56:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250121005611.06a21126@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250120234958.3247370-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 00:49:58 +0100
Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com> wrote:
> So far we omitted setting PSH flags for inbound traffic altogether: as
> we ignore the nature of the data we're sending, we can't conclude that
> some data is more or less urgent. This works fine with Linux guests,
> as the Linux kernel doesn't do much with it, on input: it will
> generally deliver data to the application layer without delay.
>
> However, with Windows, things change: if we don't set the PSH flag on
> interactive inbound traffic, we can expect long delays before the data
> is delivered to the application.
>
> This is very visible with RDP, where packets we send on behalf of the
> RDP client are delivered with delays exceeding one second:
>
> $ tshark -r rdp.pcap -td -Y 'frame.number in { 33170 .. 33173 }' --disable-protocol tls
> 33170 0.030296 93.235.154.248 → 88.198.0.164 54 TCP 49012 → 3389 [ACK] Seq=13820 Ack=285229 Win=387968 Len=0
> 33171 0.985412 88.198.0.164 → 93.235.154.248 105 TCP 3389 → 49012 [PSH, ACK] Seq=285229 Ack=13820 Win=63198 Len=51
> 33172 0.030373 93.235.154.248 → 88.198.0.164 54 TCP 49012 → 3389 [ACK] Seq=13820 Ack=285280 Win=387968 Len=0
> 33173 1.383776 88.198.0.164 → 93.235.154.248 424 TCP 3389 → 49012 [PSH, ACK] Seq=285280 Ack=13820 Win=63198 Len=370
>
> in this example (packet capture taken by passt), frame #33172 is a
> mouse event sent by the RDP client, and frame #33173 is the first
> event (display reacting to click) sent back by the server. This
> appears as a 1.4 s delay before we get frame #33173.
>
> If we set PSH, instead:
>
> $ tshark -r rdp_psh.pcap -td -Y 'frame.number in { 314 .. 317 }' --disable-protocol tls
> 314 0.002503 93.235.154.248 → 88.198.0.164 170 TCP 51066 → 3389 [PSH, ACK] Seq=7779 Ack=74047 Win=31872 Len=116
> 315 0.000557 88.198.0.164 → 93.235.154.248 54 TCP 3389 → 51066 [ACK] Seq=79162 Ack=7895 Win=62872 Len=0
> 316 0.012752 93.235.154.248 → 88.198.0.164 170 TCP 51066 → 3389 [PSH, ACK] Seq=7895 Ack=79162 Win=31872 Len=116
> 317 0.011927 88.198.0.164 → 93.235.154.248 107 TCP 3389 → 51066 [PSH, ACK] Seq=79162 Ack=8011 Win=62756 Len=53
>
> here, in frame #116, our mouse event is delivered without a delay and
^^^ 316
--
Stefano
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-20 23:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-20 23:49 [PATCH] tcp: Set PSH flag for last incoming packets in a batch Stefano Brivio
2025-01-20 23:56 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250121005611.06a21126@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).