public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: [PATCH] netlink: Skip loopback interface while looking for a template
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 09:05:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250123080548.1410738-1-sbrivio@redhat.com> (raw)

There might be reasons to have routes on the loopback interface, for
example Any-IP/AnyIP routes as implemented by Linux kernel commit
ab79ad14a2d5 ("ipv6: Implement Any-IP support for IPv6.").

If we use the loopback interface as a template, though, we'll pick
'lo' (typically) as interface name for our tap interface, but we'll
already have an interface called 'lo' in the target namespace, and as
we TUNSETIFF on it, we'll fail with EINVAL, because it's not a tap
interface.

Skip the loopback interface while looking for a template interface or,
more accurately, skip the interface with index 1.

Strictly speaking, we should fetch interface flags via RTM_GETLINK
instead, and check for IFF_LOOPBACK, but interleaving that request
while we're iterating over routes is unnecessarily complicated.

Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/podman/comments/1i6pj7u/starting_pod_without_external_network/
Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
---
 netlink.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/netlink.c b/netlink.c
index 0407692..37d8b5b 100644
--- a/netlink.c
+++ b/netlink.c
@@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ unsigned int nl_get_ext_if(int s, sa_family_t af)
 		if (!thisifi)
 			continue; /* No interface for this route */
 
+		/* Skip 'lo': we should test IFF_LOOPBACK, but keep it simple */
+		if (thisifi == 1)
+			continue;
+
 		/* Skip routes to link-local addresses */
 		if (af == AF_INET && dst &&
 		    IN4_IS_PREFIX_LINKLOCAL(dst, rtm->rtm_dst_len))
-- 
@@ -297,6 +297,10 @@ unsigned int nl_get_ext_if(int s, sa_family_t af)
 		if (!thisifi)
 			continue; /* No interface for this route */
 
+		/* Skip 'lo': we should test IFF_LOOPBACK, but keep it simple */
+		if (thisifi == 1)
+			continue;
+
 		/* Skip routes to link-local addresses */
 		if (af == AF_INET && dst &&
 		    IN4_IS_PREFIX_LINKLOCAL(dst, rtm->rtm_dst_len))
-- 
2.43.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-01-23  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-23  8:05 Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-01-23 11:49 ` [PATCH] netlink: Skip loopback interface while looking for a template Paul Holzinger
2025-01-23 11:53   ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-23 12:25     ` Paul Holzinger
2025-01-24  1:48 ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250123080548.1410738-1-sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).