From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org,
passt-dev@passt.top, lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [net,v2] tcp: correct handling of extreme memory squeeze
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2025 11:01:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250127110121.1f53b27d@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e15ff7f6-00b7-4071-866a-666a296d0b15@redhat.com>
On Fri, 24 Jan 2025 12:40:16 -0500
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com> wrote:
> I can certainly clear tp->pred_flags and post it again, maybe with
> an improved and shortened log. Would that be acceptable?
Talking about an improved log, what strikes me the most of the whole
problem is:
$ tshark -r iperf3_jon_zero_window.pcap -td -Y 'frame.number in { 1064 .. 1068 }'
1064 0.004416 192.168.122.1 → 192.168.122.198 TCP 65534 34482 → 5201 [ACK] Seq=1611679466 Ack=1 Win=36864 Len=65480
1065 0.007334 192.168.122.1 → 192.168.122.198 TCP 65534 34482 → 5201 [ACK] Seq=1611744946 Ack=1 Win=36864 Len=65480
1066 0.005104 192.168.122.1 → 192.168.122.198 TCP 56382 [TCP Window Full] 34482 → 5201 [ACK] Seq=1611810426 Ack=1 Win=36864 Len=56328
1067 0.015226 192.168.122.198 → 192.168.122.1 TCP 54 [TCP ZeroWindow] 5201 → 34482 [ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1611090146 Win=0 Len=0
1068 6.298138 fe80::44b3:f5ff:fe86:c529 → ff02::2 ICMPv6 70 Router Solicitation from 46:b3:f5:86:c5:29
...and then the silence, 192.168.122.198 never announces that its
window is not zero, so the peer gives up 15 seconds later:
$ tshark -r iperf3_jon_zero_window_cut.pcap -td -Y 'frame.number in { 1069 .. 1070 }'
1069 8.709313 192.168.122.1 → 192.168.122.198 TCP 55 34466 → 5201 [ACK] Seq=166 Ack=5 Win=36864 Len=1
1070 0.008943 192.168.122.198 → 192.168.122.1 TCP 54 5201 → 34482 [FIN, ACK] Seq=1 Ack=1611090146 Win=778240 Len=0
Data in frame #1069 is iperf3 ending the test.
This didn't happen before e2142825c120 ("net: tcp: send zero-window
ACK when no memory") so it's a relatively recent (17 months) regression.
It actually looks pretty simple (and rather serious) to me.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-27 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-17 21:40 [net,v2] tcp: correct handling of extreme memory squeeze jmaloy
2025-01-17 22:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-17 22:27 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-18 17:01 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-18 20:04 ` Neal Cardwell
2025-01-20 5:03 ` Jon Maloy
2025-01-20 16:10 ` Jon Maloy
2025-01-20 16:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-24 17:40 ` Jon Maloy
2025-01-27 9:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-27 10:01 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-01-27 10:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-01-27 10:27 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-27 10:17 ` Jason Xing
2025-01-27 10:32 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-27 13:37 ` Menglong Dong
2025-01-27 14:03 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-27 16:37 ` Eric Dumazet
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-16 2:29 [net, v2] " Jon Maloy
2025-01-16 21:14 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250127110121.1f53b27d@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=menglong8.dong@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).