From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] migrate: More sophisticated versioning
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 06:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250131065348.0b283d0f@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250131045215.1368543-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Fri, 31 Jan 2025 15:52:15 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> At present the header for our device state migration stream is sent as
> a buffer in the sections array, like anything else. It contains both
> version information, and details on the source ABI which are specific to
> v1 of the migration protocol. Alter this for greater flexibility:
>
> * We separate out a minimal fixed header, which we will need to keep for
> every future version, from a version specific header, containing (for
> v1) the ABI data
What's the purpose of this if there should be no ABI data?
I have this for the moment:
/* Immutable part of header structure: keep these two sections at the
* beginning, because they are enough to identify a version regardless
* of metadata.
*/
.magic = MIGRATE_MAGIC,
.version = htonl_constant(MIGRATE_VERSION),
/* End of immutable part of header structure */
...which to be honest already felt like wasted effort, despite being
just two comments.
> * Handle both the headers separately from the data sections making for
> better symmetry between the source and target sides
> * Add a "compat_version" field. This will allow us to make future
> protocol extensions which are backwards compatible with older targets,
> while retaining the ability to also make breaking protocol extensions.
>
> This establishes a minimal header with fixed representation to maintain
> for all future versions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> migrate.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> migrate.h | 26 ++++++---
> 2 files changed, 138 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
^^^
...is this really a good idea if we want to drop this right away? I
might be missing something but I think it would more sense to focus on
the "targeted" data transfer instead.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-31 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-31 4:52 [PATCH 0/2] Fancier version handling for migration David Gibson
2025-01-31 4:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] migrate: Merge protocol version information into one table David Gibson
2025-01-31 5:53 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-01-31 6:17 ` David Gibson
2025-01-31 4:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] migrate: More sophisticated versioning David Gibson
2025-01-31 5:53 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-01-31 6:21 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250131065348.0b283d0f@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).