From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top, lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] udp: create and send ICMPv4 to local peer when applicable
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 11:27:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250210112720.78896011@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250209170056.1160547-1-jmaloy@redhat.com>
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 12:00:56 -0500
Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com> wrote:
> When a local peer sends a UDP message to a non-existing port on an
> existing remote host, that host will return an ICMP message containing
> the error code ICMP_PORT_UNREACH, plus the header and the first eight
> bytes of the original message. If the sender socket has been connected,
> it uses this message to issue a "Connection Refused" event to the user.
>
> Until now, we have only read such events from the externally facing
> socket, but we don't forward them back to the local sender because
> we cannot read the ICMP message directly to user space. Because of
> this, the local peer will hang and wait for a response that never
> arrives.
I haven't had a chance to really review this yet, in general it looks
great to me (I was afraid it would be more complicated).
I have a couple of preliminary questions though:
- referring to the paragraph above: what about TCP (which is the case
where a peer might actually hang)? Do you plan to support errors for
TCP's connect() in a separate patch?
> We now fix this for IPv4 by recreating and forwarding a correct ICMP
> message back to the internal sender. We synthesize the message based
> on the information in the extended error structure, plus the returned
> part of the original message body.
- ...and what about IPv6 and NDP? Also separate patch?
In that case, would it perhaps make sense to implement and submit that
as a series so that we have a consistent behaviour to begin with?
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-10 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-09 17:00 [PATCH] udp: create and send ICMPv4 to local peer when applicable Jon Maloy
2025-02-10 10:27 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-02-11 0:55 ` David Gibson
2025-02-12 21:39 ` Jon Maloy
2025-02-12 23:21 ` David Gibson
2025-02-13 19:07 ` Jon Maloy
2025-02-13 19:17 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-02-13 19:28 ` Jon Maloy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250210112720.78896011@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).