From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 28/29] packet: add memory regions information into pool
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 16:21:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250526162138.3cc8f2a4@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250417165136.2688884-29-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 18:51:35 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> Do not hack anymore the buf pointer to detect and manage memory regions
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> packet.c | 4 ++--
> packet.h | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> tap.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
> tap.h | 1 -
> vhost_user.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
> virtio.c | 4 ++--
> virtio.h | 8 ++++++--
> vu_common.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 8 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/packet.c b/packet.c
> index 53ede9fcb509..0a2ad28d3d25 100644
> --- a/packet.c
> +++ b/packet.c
> @@ -41,10 +41,10 @@ static int packet_check_range(const struct pool *p, const char *ptr, size_t len,
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (p->buf_size == 0) {
> + if (p->memory) {
> int ret;
>
> - ret = vu_packet_check_range((void *)p->buf, ptr, len);
> + ret = vu_packet_check_range(p->memory, ptr, len);
>
> if (ret == -1)
> debug("cannot find region, %s:%i", func, line);
> diff --git a/packet.h b/packet.h
> index bbea04eac455..e951187a7ef0 100644
> --- a/packet.h
> +++ b/packet.h
> @@ -9,20 +9,22 @@
> #include <stdbool.h>
> #include "iov.h"
>
> +struct vdev_memory;
If I drop this forward declaration, gcc is still happy. I guess you
needed it in a previous version, but not anymore.
> +
> /* Maximum size of a single packet stored in pool, including headers */
> #define PACKET_MAX_LEN ((size_t)UINT16_MAX)
>
> /**
> * struct pool - Generic pool of packets stored in a buffer
> - * @buf: Buffer storing packet descriptors,
> - * a struct vu_dev_region array for passt vhost-user mode
> + * @memory: Memory regions defined for vhost-user, NULL otherwise
> + * @buf: Buffer storing packet descriptors or iovec entries,
> * @buf_size: Total size of buffer,
> - * 0 for passt vhost-user mode
> * @size: Number of usable descriptors for the pool
> * @count: Number of used descriptors for the pool
> * @pkt: Descriptors: see macros below
> */
> struct pool {
> + struct vdev_memory *memory;
> char *buf;
> size_t buf_size;
> size_t size;
> @@ -30,7 +32,8 @@ struct pool {
> struct iovec pkt[];
> };
>
> -int vu_packet_check_range(void *buf, const char *ptr, size_t len);
> +int vu_packet_check_range(struct vdev_memory *memory,
> + const char *ptr, size_t len);
> void packet_add_do(struct pool *p, struct iov_tail *data,
> const char *func, int line);
> bool packet_data_do(const struct pool *p, const size_t idx,
> @@ -46,6 +49,7 @@ void pool_flush(struct pool *p);
>
> #define PACKET_POOL_DECL(_name, _size) \
> struct _name ## _t { \
> + struct vdev_memory *memory; \
> char *buf; \
> size_t buf_size; \
> size_t size; \
> @@ -53,15 +57,17 @@ struct _name ## _t { \
> struct iovec pkt[_size]; \
> }
>
> -#define PACKET_POOL_INIT_NOCAST(_size, _buf, _buf_size) \
> +#define PACKET_POOL_INIT_NOCAST(_size, _buf, _buf_size, _memory) \
> { \
> .buf_size = _buf_size, \
> .buf = _buf, \
> .size = _size, \
> + .memory = _memory \
> }
>
> -#define PACKET_INIT(name, size, buf, buf_size) \
> - (struct name ## _t) PACKET_POOL_INIT_NOCAST(size, buf, buf_size)
> +#define PACKET_INIT(name, size, buf, buf_size, memory) \
> + (struct name ## _t) \
> + PACKET_POOL_INIT_NOCAST(size, buf, buf_size, memory)
>
> #define PACKET_POOL_NOINIT(name, size) \
> PACKET_POOL_DECL(name, size) name ## _storage; \
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index 615609d4ded2..419b09b4cee7 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -1453,17 +1453,23 @@ static void tap_sock_tun_init(struct ctx *c)
> * tap_sock_update_pool() - Set the buffer base and size for the pool of packets
> * @base: Buffer base
> * @size Buffer size
> + * @memory: vhost-user memory regions
> */
> -void tap_sock_update_pool(void *base, size_t size)
> +static void tap_sock_update_pool(void *base, size_t size,
> + struct vdev_memory *memory)
> {
> int i;
>
> - pool_tap4_storage = PACKET_INIT(pool_tap4, TAP_MSGS_IP4, base, size);
> - pool_tap6_storage = PACKET_INIT(pool_tap6, TAP_MSGS_IP6, base, size);
> + pool_tap4_storage = PACKET_INIT(pool_tap4, TAP_MSGS_IP4, base, size,
> + memory);
> + pool_tap6_storage = PACKET_INIT(pool_tap6, TAP_MSGS_IP6, base, size,
> + memory);
>
> for (i = 0; i < TAP_SEQS; i++) {
> - tap4_l4[i].p = PACKET_INIT(pool_l4, UIO_MAXIOV, base, size);
> - tap6_l4[i].p = PACKET_INIT(pool_l4, UIO_MAXIOV, base, size);
> + tap4_l4[i].p = PACKET_INIT(pool_l4, UIO_MAXIOV, base, size,
> + memory);
> + tap6_l4[i].p = PACKET_INIT(pool_l4, UIO_MAXIOV, base, size,
> + memory);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1474,12 +1480,13 @@ void tap_sock_update_pool(void *base, size_t size)
> */
> void tap_backend_init(struct ctx *c)
> {
> + struct vdev_memory *memory = NULL;
> +
> if (c->mode == MODE_VU) {
> - tap_sock_update_pool(NULL, 0);
> vu_init(c);
> - } else {
> - tap_sock_update_pool(pkt_buf, sizeof(pkt_buf));
> + memory = &c->vdev->memory;
> }
> + tap_sock_update_pool(pkt_buf, sizeof(pkt_buf), memory);
>
> if (c->fd_tap != -1) { /* Passed as --fd */
> ASSERT(c->one_off);
> diff --git a/tap.h b/tap.h
> index 954ad440a287..655b6ed9d2fd 100644
> --- a/tap.h
> +++ b/tap.h
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ void tap_handler_passt(struct ctx *c, uint32_t events,
> const struct timespec *now);
> int tap_sock_unix_open(char *sock_path);
> void tap_sock_reset(struct ctx *c);
> -void tap_sock_update_pool(void *base, size_t size);
> void tap_backend_init(struct ctx *c);
> void tap_flush_pools(void);
> void tap_handler(struct ctx *c, const struct timespec *now);
> diff --git a/vhost_user.c b/vhost_user.c
> index 105f77a5df2b..e53ea21909e3 100644
> --- a/vhost_user.c
> +++ b/vhost_user.c
> @@ -137,8 +137,8 @@ static void *qva_to_va(struct vu_dev *dev, uint64_t qemu_addr)
> unsigned int i;
>
> /* Find matching memory region. */
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
> - const struct vu_dev_region *r = &dev->regions[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->memory.nregions; i++) {
> + const struct vu_dev_region *r = &dev->memory.regions[i];
>
> if ((qemu_addr >= r->qva) && (qemu_addr < (r->qva + r->size))) {
> /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(performance-no-int-to-ptr) */
> @@ -428,8 +428,8 @@ static bool vu_set_mem_table_exec(struct vu_dev *vdev,
> struct vhost_user_memory m = msg->payload.memory, *memory = &m;
> unsigned int i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vdev->nregions; i++) {
> - const struct vu_dev_region *r = &vdev->regions[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < vdev->memory.nregions; i++) {
> + const struct vu_dev_region *r = &vdev->memory.regions[i];
>
> if (r->mmap_addr) {
> /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(performance-no-int-to-ptr) */
> @@ -437,12 +437,12 @@ static bool vu_set_mem_table_exec(struct vu_dev *vdev,
> r->size + r->mmap_offset);
> }
> }
> - vdev->nregions = memory->nregions;
> + vdev->memory.nregions = memory->nregions;
>
> debug("vhost-user nregions: %u", memory->nregions);
> - for (i = 0; i < vdev->nregions; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < vdev->memory.nregions; i++) {
> struct vhost_user_memory_region *msg_region = &memory->regions[i];
> - struct vu_dev_region *dev_region = &vdev->regions[i];
> + struct vu_dev_region *dev_region = &vdev->memory.regions[i];
> void *mmap_addr;
>
> debug("vhost-user region %d", i);
> @@ -484,13 +484,7 @@ static bool vu_set_mem_table_exec(struct vu_dev *vdev,
> }
> }
>
> - /* As vu_packet_check_range() has no access to the number of
> - * memory regions, mark the end of the array with mmap_addr = 0
> - */
> - ASSERT(vdev->nregions < VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS - 1);
> - vdev->regions[vdev->nregions].mmap_addr = 0;
> -
> - tap_sock_update_pool(vdev->regions, 0);
> + ASSERT(vdev->memory.nregions < VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS);
>
> return false;
> }
> @@ -1107,8 +1101,8 @@ void vu_cleanup(struct vu_dev *vdev)
> vq->vring.avail = 0;
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; i < vdev->nregions; i++) {
> - const struct vu_dev_region *r = &vdev->regions[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < vdev->memory.nregions; i++) {
> + const struct vu_dev_region *r = &vdev->memory.regions[i];
>
> if (r->mmap_addr) {
> /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(performance-no-int-to-ptr) */
> @@ -1116,7 +1110,7 @@ void vu_cleanup(struct vu_dev *vdev)
> r->size + r->mmap_offset);
> }
> }
> - vdev->nregions = 0;
> + vdev->memory.nregions = 0;
>
> vu_close_log(vdev);
>
> diff --git a/virtio.c b/virtio.c
> index bc2b89a7f4a7..2b0a8d0dc4c5 100644
> --- a/virtio.c
> +++ b/virtio.c
> @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ static void *vu_gpa_to_va(const struct vu_dev *dev, uint64_t *plen,
> return NULL;
>
> /* Find matching memory region. */
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->nregions; i++) {
> - const struct vu_dev_region *r = &dev->regions[i];
> + for (i = 0; i < dev->memory.nregions; i++) {
> + const struct vu_dev_region *r = &dev->memory.regions[i];
>
> if ((guest_addr >= r->gpa) &&
> (guest_addr < (r->gpa + r->size))) {
> diff --git a/virtio.h b/virtio.h
> index 7a370bdeae65..5acd4f19f0ed 100644
> --- a/virtio.h
> +++ b/virtio.h
> @@ -96,6 +96,11 @@ struct vu_dev_region {
> */
> #define VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS 32
>
> +struct vdev_memory {
It would be nice to have the usual struct documentation.
> + uint32_t nregions;
> + struct vu_dev_region regions[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
> +};
> +
> /**
> * struct vu_dev - vhost-user device information
> * @context: Execution context
> @@ -109,8 +114,7 @@ struct vu_dev_region {
> */
> struct vu_dev {
> struct ctx *context;
> - uint32_t nregions;
> - struct vu_dev_region regions[VHOST_USER_MAX_RAM_SLOTS];
> + struct vdev_memory memory;
...and to update the comment to struct vu_dev_region accordingly.
> struct vu_virtq vq[VHOST_USER_MAX_QUEUES];
> uint64_t features;
> uint64_t protocol_features;
> diff --git a/vu_common.c b/vu_common.c
> index b77b21420c57..19fe22935a1e 100644
> --- a/vu_common.c
> +++ b/vu_common.c
> @@ -25,26 +25,28 @@
> /**
> * vu_packet_check_range() - Check if a given memory zone is contained in
> * a mapped guest memory region
> - * @buf: Array of the available memory regions
> + * @memory: Allowed memory regions
...is there any particular reason why they were "available", earlier,
and now they are "allowed" instead? I'm not sure if it's an oversight
or it's actually intended.
> * @ptr: Start of desired data range
> * @size: Length of desired data range
> *
> * Return: 0 if the zone is in a mapped memory region, -1 otherwise
> */
> -int vu_packet_check_range(void *buf, const char *ptr, size_t len)
> +int vu_packet_check_range(struct vdev_memory *memory,
> + const char *ptr, size_t len)
> {
> - struct vu_dev_region *dev_region;
> + struct vu_dev_region *dev_region = memory->regions;
> + unsigned int i;
>
> - for (dev_region = buf; dev_region->mmap_addr; dev_region++) {
> - uintptr_t base_addr = dev_region->mmap_addr +
> - dev_region->mmap_offset;
> + for (i = 0; i < memory->nregions; i++) {
> + uintptr_t base_addr = dev_region[i].mmap_addr +
> + dev_region[i].mmap_offset;
> /* NOLINTNEXTLINE(performance-no-int-to-ptr) */
> const char *base = (const char *)base_addr;
>
> - ASSERT(base_addr >= dev_region->mmap_addr);
> + ASSERT(base_addr >= dev_region[i].mmap_addr);
>
> - if (len <= dev_region->size && base <= ptr &&
> - (size_t)(ptr - base) <= dev_region->size - len)
> + if (len <= dev_region[i].size && base <= ptr &&
> + (size_t)(ptr - base) <= dev_region[i].size - len)
> return 0;
> }
>
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-26 14:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-17 16:51 [PATCH v5 00/29] Introduce discontiguous frames management Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 01/29] arp: Don't mix incoming and outgoing buffers Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:18 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 02/29] iov: Introduce iov_slice(), iov_tail_slice() and iov_tail_drop() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-05-26 15:20 ` Laurent Vivier
2025-06-02 13:35 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 03/29] iov: Update IOV_REMOVE_HEADER() and IOV_PEEK_HEADER() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-06-02 15:36 ` Laurent Vivier
2025-06-03 8:42 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 04/29] tap: Use iov_tail with tap_add_packet() Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 05/29] packet: Use iov_tail with packet_add() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 06/29] packet: Add packet_data() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 07/29] arp: Convert to iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:19 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 08/29] ndp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 09/29] icmp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 10/29] udp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-05-26 15:47 ` Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 11/29] tcp: Convert tcp_tap_handler() to use iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 12/29] tcp: Convert tcp_data_from_tap() " Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 13/29] dhcpv6: move offset initialization out of dhcpv6_opt() Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 14/29] dhcpv6: Extract sending of NotOnLink status Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 15/29] dhcpv6: Convert to iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 16/29] dhcpv6: Use iov_tail in dhcpv6_opt() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 17/29] dhcp: Convert to iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 18/29] ip: Use iov_tail in ipv6_l4hdr() Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 19/29] tap: Convert tap4_handler() to iov_tail Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 20/29] tap: Convert tap6_handler() " Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 21/29] arp: use iov_tail rather than pool Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 22/29] dhcp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 23/29] dhcpv6: " Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 24/29] icmp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 25/29] ndp: " Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 26/29] packet: remove PACKET_POOL() and PACKET_POOL_P() Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 27/29] packet: remove unused parameter from PACKET_POOL_DECL() Laurent Vivier
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 28/29] packet: add memory regions information into pool Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-04-17 16:51 ` [PATCH v5 29/29] packet: use buf to store iovec array Laurent Vivier
2025-05-26 14:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-05-27 13:16 ` Laurent Vivier
2025-06-02 13:35 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250526162138.3cc8f2a4@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).