From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/8] fwd: Move port exclusion handling from procfs_scan_listen() to callers
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:24:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251030212404.3eda9c82@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251011044827.862757-5-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Sat, 11 Oct 2025 15:48:23 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> To avoid forwarding loops, we need to exclude certain ports from being
> auto-forwarded. To accomplish this, procfs_scan_listen() takes a bitmap
> of exclusions. As it detects each port, it checks against that bitmap.
> This is a complicated way of accomplishing what we need. We can instead
> mask out the excluded ports in the callers using a new bitmap_andc()
> helper.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> ---
> fwd.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------------------
> util.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> util.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fwd.c b/fwd.c
> index 19309f14..c7b768d5 100644
> --- a/fwd.c
> +++ b/fwd.c
> @@ -110,13 +110,11 @@ bool fwd_port_is_ephemeral(in_port_t port)
> * @fd: fd for relevant /proc/net file
> * @lstate: Code for listening state to scan for
> * @map: Bitmap where numbers of ports in listening state will be set
> - * @exclude: Bitmap of ports to exclude from setting (and clear)
> *
> * #syscalls:pasta lseek
> * #syscalls:pasta ppc64le:_llseek ppc64:_llseek arm:_llseek
> */
> -static void procfs_scan_listen(int fd, unsigned int lstate,
> - uint8_t *map, const uint8_t *exclude)
> +static void procfs_scan_listen(int fd, unsigned int lstate, uint8_t *map)
> {
> struct lineread lr;
> unsigned long port;
> @@ -141,10 +139,7 @@ static void procfs_scan_listen(int fd, unsigned int lstate,
> if (state != lstate)
> continue;
>
> - if (bitmap_isset(exclude, port))
> - bitmap_clear(map, port);
> - else
> - bitmap_set(map, port);
> + bitmap_set(map, port);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -157,8 +152,9 @@ static void fwd_scan_ports_tcp(struct fwd_ports *fwd,
> const struct fwd_ports *rev)
> {
> memset(fwd->map, 0, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE);
> - procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan4, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map, rev->map);
> - procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan6, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map, rev->map);
> + procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan4, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
> + procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan6, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
> + bitmap_andc(fwd->map, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE, fwd->map, rev->map);
I'm not entirely sure why I implemented it this way in 9657b6ed05cc
("conf, tcp: Periodic detection of bound ports for pasta port
forwarding").
I guess the original idea was that only procfs_scan_listen() would
manipulate bitmaps, for whatever reason. In any case, I'm fairly
sure that this is equivalent (it obviously look like it, but I'm
having a hard time to convince myself because of the weird way I
implemented it originally).
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -173,26 +169,26 @@ static void fwd_scan_ports_udp(struct fwd_ports *fwd,
> const struct fwd_ports *tcp_fwd,
> const struct fwd_ports *tcp_rev)
> {
> - uint8_t exclude[PORT_BITMAP_SIZE];
> -
> - bitmap_or(exclude, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE, rev->map, tcp_rev->map);
> -
> memset(fwd->map, 0, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE);
> - procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan4, UDP_LISTEN, fwd->map, exclude);
> - procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan6, UDP_LISTEN, fwd->map, exclude);
> + procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan4, UDP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
> + procfs_scan_listen(fwd->scan6, UDP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
>
> /* Also forward UDP ports with the same numbers as bound TCP ports.
> * This is useful for a handful of protocols (e.g. iperf3) where a TCP
> * control port is used to set up transfers on a corresponding UDP
> * port.
> - *
> + */
> + procfs_scan_listen(tcp_fwd->scan4, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
> + procfs_scan_listen(tcp_fwd->scan6, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map);
> +
> + /*
> * This means we need to skip numbers of TCP ports bound on the other
Nit: /* This ...
> * side, too. Otherwise, we would detect corresponding UDP ports as
> * bound and try to forward them from the opposite side, but it's
> * already us handling them.
> */
> - procfs_scan_listen(tcp_fwd->scan4, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map, exclude);
> - procfs_scan_listen(tcp_fwd->scan6, TCP_LISTEN, fwd->map, exclude);
> + bitmap_andc(fwd->map, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE, fwd->map, rev->map);
> + bitmap_andc(fwd->map, PORT_BITMAP_SIZE, fwd->map, tcp_rev->map);
> }
>
> /**
> diff --git a/util.c b/util.c
> index c492f904..eabadf7d 100644
> --- a/util.c
> +++ b/util.c
> @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ void bitmap_set(uint8_t *map, unsigned bit)
> * @map: Pointer to bitmap
> * @bit: Bit number to clear
> */
> +/* cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction */
> void bitmap_clear(uint8_t *map, unsigned bit)
> {
> unsigned long *word = (unsigned long *)map + BITMAP_WORD(bit);
> @@ -351,6 +352,7 @@ bool bitmap_isset(const uint8_t *map, unsigned bit)
> * @a: First operand
> * @b: Second operand
> */
> +/* cppcheck-suppress unusedFunction */
Should we just drop those? git stores them for us.
> void bitmap_or(uint8_t *dst, size_t size, const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b)
> {
> unsigned long *dw = (unsigned long *)dst;
> @@ -365,6 +367,27 @@ void bitmap_or(uint8_t *dst, size_t size, const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b)
> dst[i] = a[i] | b[i];
> }
>
> +/**
> + * bitmap_andc() - Logical conjunction with complement (AND NOT) of bitmap
Nit: this function name mixes classic logic terminology (conjunction,
complement) and operator names (and, not), which makes it hard to guess,
I think.
The Linux kernel has __bitmap_andnot(), which I find rather cacophonic,
so what about bitmap_and_not() instead? It kind of fits with how we call
these things in passt.
> + * @dst: Pointer to result bitmap
> + * @size: Size of bitmaps, in bytes
> + * @a: First operand
> + * @b: Second operand
> + */
> +void bitmap_andc(uint8_t *dst, size_t size, const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b)
> +{
> + unsigned long *dw = (unsigned long *)dst;
> + unsigned long *aw = (unsigned long *)a;
> + unsigned long *bw = (unsigned long *)b;
> + size_t i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < size / sizeof(long); i++, dw++, aw++, bw++)
> + *dw = *aw & ~*bw;
> +
> + for (i = size / sizeof(long) * sizeof(long); i < size; i++)
> + dst[i] = a[i] & ~b[i];
> +}
> +
> /**
> * ns_enter() - Enter configured user (unless already joined) and network ns
> * @c: Execution context
> diff --git a/util.h b/util.h
> index 22eaac56..ac8339a3 100644
> --- a/util.h
> +++ b/util.h
> @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ void bitmap_set(uint8_t *map, unsigned bit);
> void bitmap_clear(uint8_t *map, unsigned bit);
> bool bitmap_isset(const uint8_t *map, unsigned bit);
> void bitmap_or(uint8_t *dst, size_t size, const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b);
> +void bitmap_andc(uint8_t *dst, size_t size, const uint8_t *a, const uint8_t *b);
> char *line_read(char *buf, size_t len, int fd);
> void ns_enter(const struct ctx *c);
> bool ns_is_init(void);
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 4:48 [PATCH 0/8] RFC: Cleanups to auto port scanning David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] icmp: Remove vestiges of ICMP timer David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] tcp, udp, fwd: Run all port scanning from a single timer David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] fwd: Consolidate scans (not rebinds) in fwd.c David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] fwd: Move port exclusion handling from procfs_scan_listen() to callers David Gibson
2025-10-30 20:24 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2025-10-31 2:47 ` David Gibson
2025-10-31 8:21 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-11-03 1:43 ` David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] fwd: Share port scanning logic between init and timer cases David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] fwd: Check forwarding mode in fwd_scan_ports_*() rather than caller David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] fwd: Update all port maps before applying exclusions David Gibson
2025-10-30 20:24 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-10-31 2:51 ` David Gibson
2025-10-11 4:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] tcp, udp: Don't exclude ports in {tcp,udp}_port_rebind() David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251030212404.3eda9c82@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).