public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH v4 9/9] tcp, udp: Bind outbound listening sockets by interface instead of address
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 16:22:57 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251119052257.3004500-10-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251119052257.3004500-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

Currently, outbound forwards (-T, -U) are handled by sockets bound to the
loopback address.  Typically we create two sockets, one for 127.0.0.1 and
one for ::1.

This has some disadvantages:
 * The guest can't connect via 127.0.0.0/8 addresses other than 127.0.0.1
 * We can't use dual-stack sockets, we have to have separate sockets for
   IPv4 and IPv6.

The restriction exists for a reason though.  If the guest has any
interfaces other than pasta (e.g. a VPN tunnel) external hosts could reach
the host via the forwards.  Especially combined with -T auto / -U auto this
would make it very easy to make a mistake with nasty security implications.

We can achieve this a different way, however.  Don't bind to a specific
address, but _do_ use SO_BINDTODEVICE to restrict the sockets to the "lo"
interface.

Note that although traffic to a local but non-loopback address is passed
over the 'lo' interface (as seen by netfilter and dumpcap), it doesn't
count as attached to that interface for the purposes of SO_BINDTODEVICE
(information from the routing table overrides the "physical" interface).
So, this change doesn't help for bug 100.

It's also not a complete fix for bug 113, it does however:
 * Get us a step closer to fixing bug 113
 * Slightly simplify the code
 * Make things a bit easier to allow more flexible binding on the guest in
   in future

Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=100
Link: https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=113

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 pif.c |  6 ------
 tcp.c | 19 ++-----------------
 udp.c | 10 +++-------
 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pif.c b/pif.c
index 85904f35..db447b4f 100644
--- a/pif.c
+++ b/pif.c
@@ -81,12 +81,6 @@ int pif_sock_l4(const struct ctx *c, enum epoll_type type, uint8_t pif,
 
 	ASSERT(pif_is_socket(pif));
 
-	if (pif == PIF_SPLICE) {
-		/* Sanity checks */
-		ASSERT(!ifname);
-		ASSERT(addr && inany_is_loopback(addr));
-	}
-
 	if (!addr) {
 		ref.fd = sock_l4_dualstack(c, type, port, ifname);
 	} else {
diff --git a/tcp.c b/tcp.c
index 2abb8be4..bd25952f 100644
--- a/tcp.c
+++ b/tcp.c
@@ -2618,21 +2618,6 @@ int tcp_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, uint8_t pif,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-/**
- * tcp_ns_sock_init() - Init socket to listen for spliced outbound connections
- * @c:		Execution context
- * @port:	Port, host order
- */
-static void tcp_ns_sock_init(const struct ctx *c, in_port_t port)
-{
-	ASSERT(!c->no_tcp);
-
-	if (c->ifi4)
-		tcp_sock_init_one(c, PIF_SPLICE, &inany_loopback4, NULL, port);
-	if (c->ifi6)
-		tcp_sock_init_one(c, PIF_SPLICE, &inany_loopback6, NULL, port);
-}
-
 /**
  * tcp_ns_socks_init() - Bind sockets in namespace for outbound connections
  * @arg:	Execution context
@@ -2651,7 +2636,7 @@ static int tcp_ns_socks_init(void *arg)
 		if (!bitmap_isset(c->tcp.fwd_out.map, port))
 			continue;
 
-		tcp_ns_sock_init(c, port);
+		tcp_sock_init(c, PIF_SPLICE, NULL, "lo", port);
 	}
 
 	return 0;
@@ -2826,7 +2811,7 @@ static void tcp_port_rebind(struct ctx *c, bool outbound)
 		if ((c->ifi4 && socks[port][V4] == -1) ||
 		    (c->ifi6 && socks[port][V6] == -1)) {
 			if (outbound)
-				tcp_ns_sock_init(c, port);
+				tcp_sock_init(c, PIF_SPLICE, NULL, "lo", port);
 			else
 				tcp_sock_init(c, PIF_HOST, NULL, NULL, port);
 		}
diff --git a/udp.c b/udp.c
index 3d097fbb..f3d445cf 100644
--- a/udp.c
+++ b/udp.c
@@ -1213,14 +1213,10 @@ static void udp_port_rebind(struct ctx *c, bool outbound)
 
 		if ((c->ifi4 && socks[V4][port] == -1) ||
 		    (c->ifi6 && socks[V6][port] == -1)) {
-			if (outbound) {
-				udp_sock_init(c, PIF_SPLICE,
-					      &inany_loopback4, NULL, port);
-				udp_sock_init(c, PIF_SPLICE,
-					      &inany_loopback6, NULL, port);
-			} else {
+			if (outbound)
+				udp_sock_init(c, PIF_SPLICE, NULL, "lo", port);
+			else
 				udp_sock_init(c, PIF_HOST, NULL, NULL, port);
-			}
 		}
 	}
 }
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-19  5:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-19  5:22 [PATCH v4 0/9] Reduce differences between inbound and outbound socket binding David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] flow: Remove bogus @path field from flowside_sock_args David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] inany: Let length of sockaddr_inany be implicit from the family David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] util, flow, pif: Simplify sock_l4_sa() interface David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] tcp: Merge tcp_ns_sock_init[46]() into tcp_sock_init_one() David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] udp: Unify some more inbound/outbound parts of udp_sock_init() David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] udp: Move udp_sock_init() special case to its caller David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] util: Fix setting of IPV6_V6ONLY socket option David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] tcp, udp: Remove fallback if creating dual stack socket fails David Gibson
2025-11-19  5:22 ` David Gibson [this message]
2025-11-21  3:56   ` [PATCH v4 9/9] tcp, udp: Bind outbound listening sockets by interface instead of address Stefano Brivio
2025-11-21  5:24     ` David Gibson
2025-11-21  5:39       ` Stefano Brivio
2025-11-26  5:42     ` David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251119052257.3004500-10-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).