public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
To: passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] udp_flow: Assign socket to flow inside udp_flow_sock()
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2025 17:45:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251219164518.930012-3-lvivier@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251219164518.930012-1-lvivier@redhat.com>

Move the assignment of uflow->s[sidei] from the caller (udp_flow_new())
into udp_flow_sock() itself, placing it after the successful connect().

This is a pure refactoring with no functional change.  The socket fd is
now assigned within udp_flow_sock() where the socket is created, rather
than requiring the caller to capture the return value.  On error paths,
uflow->s[sidei] remains at its initialized value of -1 rather than being
set to the negative error code, which is semantically cleaner (though
functionally equivalent given the >= 0 check in udp_flow_close()).

Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
---
 udp_flow.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/udp_flow.c b/udp_flow.c
index 8907f2f72741..33f29f21e69e 100644
--- a/udp_flow.c
+++ b/udp_flow.c
@@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ static int udp_flow_sock(const struct ctx *c,
 		flow_dbg_perror(uflow, "Couldn't connect flow socket");
 		return rc;
 	}
+	uflow->s[sidei] = s;
 
 	/* It's possible, if unlikely, that we could receive some packets in
 	 * between the bind() and connect() which may or may not be for this
@@ -163,7 +164,7 @@ static flow_sidx_t udp_flow_new(const struct ctx *c, union flow *flow,
 
 	flow_foreach_sidei(sidei) {
 		if (pif_is_socket(uflow->f.pif[sidei]))
-			if ((uflow->s[sidei] = udp_flow_sock(c, uflow, sidei)) < 0)
+			if (udp_flow_sock(c, uflow, sidei) < 0)
 				goto cancel;
 	}
 
-- 
2.51.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-12-19 16:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-19 16:45 [PATCH 0/7] flow: Introduce flow_epoll_set() to centralize epoll operations Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 1/7] tcp: Update EPOLL_TYPE_TCP_TIMER fd Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` Laurent Vivier [this message]
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 3/7] tcp_splice: Refactor tcp_splice_conn_epoll_events() to per-side computation Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 4/7] flow: Introduce flow_epoll_set() to centralize epoll operations Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 5/7] flow: Use epoll_id_to_fd[EPOLLFD_ID_DEFAULT] in flow_epollid_set() Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 6/7] flow: Compute epoll events inside flow_epoll_set() Laurent Vivier
2025-12-19 16:45 ` [PATCH 7/7] flow: Have flow_epoll_set() retrieve file descriptor from flow structure Laurent Vivier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251219164518.930012-3-lvivier@redhat.com \
    --to=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).