Re: [PATCH 5/5] pesto: Introduce stub configuration interface and tool

[Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>]

On Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:48:50 +1100
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 01:02:46AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > Note: we should remember to tackle your own comments from
> > <aYqw6M2G9n-tv9Qm@zatzit>, eventually (not necessarily now, but fd_conf
> > just reminded me).  
> 
> Uh, don't remember what that mail was and I'm not immediately sure how
> to search for it based on message-id.

No need to search, we use public-inbox, so:

  https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/aYqw6M2G9n-tv9Qm@zatzit

(or, at least in claws-mail, select "Extended" in the search box, then
'i MSG_ID').

> > > [...]
> > >
> > > +++ b/pesto.1
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
> > > +.\" SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > > +.\" Copyright Red Hat
> > > +.\" Author: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > > +.TH pesto 1
> > > +
> > > +.SH NAME
> > > +.B pesto
> > > +\- View or alter configuration of a running \fBpasst\fR(1) or
> > > +\fBpasta\fR(1).  
> > 
> > ...process/instance?  
> 
> I had that initially, but I was trying to keep it to one line.

Ah, oops, I see. On the other hand:

\- Configure a running \fBpasst\fR(1) or \fBpasta\fR(1) instance.

fits on one line. Whatever, both are fine by me, i just thought you
forgot a word.

-- 
Stefano