From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] vu_common: Pass explicit frame length to vu_flush()
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2026 08:20:43 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260403082042.624f7ecb@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260401191826.1782394-9-lvivier@redhat.com>
On Wed, 1 Apr 2026 21:18:24 +0200
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com> wrote:
> Currently vu_flush() derives the frame size from the iov, but in
> preparation for iov arrays that may be larger than the actual frame,
> pass the total length (including vnet header) explicitly so that only
> the relevant portion is reported to the virtqueue.
>
> Ensure a minimum frame size of ETH_ZLEN + VNET_HLEN to handle short
> frames. All elements are still flushed to avoid descriptor leaks,
> but trailing elements beyond frame_len will report a zero length.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>
> ---
> tcp_vu.c | 6 +++---
> udp_vu.c | 2 +-
> vu_common.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> vu_common.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcp_vu.c b/tcp_vu.c
> index 329fa969fca1..105bca41c6de 100644
> --- a/tcp_vu.c
> +++ b/tcp_vu.c
> @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ int tcp_vu_send_flag(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> l2len = optlen + hdrlen - VNET_HLEN;
> vu_pad(&flags_elem[0].in_sg[0], l2len);
>
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, flags_elem, 1);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, flags_elem, 1, hdrlen + optlen);
>
> if (*c->pcap)
> pcap_iov(&flags_elem[0].in_sg[0], 1, VNET_HLEN,
> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ int tcp_vu_send_flag(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn, int flags)
> flags_elem[0].in_sg[0].iov_base,
> flags_elem[0].in_sg[0].iov_len);
>
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, &flags_elem[1], 1);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, &flags_elem[1], 1, hdrlen + optlen);
>
> if (*c->pcap)
> pcap_iov(&flags_elem[1].in_sg[0], 1, VNET_HLEN,
> @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ int tcp_vu_data_from_sock(const struct ctx *c, struct tcp_tap_conn *conn)
> l2len = dlen + hdrlen - VNET_HLEN;
> vu_pad(iov, l2len);
>
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, &elem[head[i]], buf_cnt);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, &elem[head[i]], buf_cnt, dlen + hdrlen);
>
> if (*c->pcap)
> pcap_iov(iov, buf_cnt, VNET_HLEN,
> diff --git a/udp_vu.c b/udp_vu.c
> index 81491afa7e6a..4641f42eb5c4 100644
> --- a/udp_vu.c
> +++ b/udp_vu.c
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ void udp_vu_sock_to_tap(const struct ctx *c, int s, int n, flow_sidx_t tosidx)
> pcap_iov(iov_vu, iov_cnt, VNET_HLEN,
> hdrlen + dlen - VNET_HLEN);
> }
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, elem_used);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, elem_used, hdrlen + dlen);
> vu_queue_notify(vdev, vq);
> }
> }
> diff --git a/vu_common.c b/vu_common.c
> index f254cb67ec78..d371a59a1813 100644
> --- a/vu_common.c
> +++ b/vu_common.c
> @@ -134,18 +134,27 @@ static void vu_set_vnethdr(struct virtio_net_hdr_mrg_rxbuf *vnethdr,
> * @vq: vhost-user virtqueue
> * @elem: virtqueue elements array to send back to the virtqueue
> * @elem_cnt: Length of the array
> + * @frame_len: Total frame length including vnet header
> */
> void vu_flush(const struct vu_dev *vdev, struct vu_virtq *vq,
> - struct vu_virtq_element *elem, int elem_cnt)
> + struct vu_virtq_element *elem, int elem_cnt, size_t frame_len)
> {
> + size_t len;
> int i;
>
> vu_set_vnethdr(elem[0].in_sg[0].iov_base, elem_cnt);
>
> + len = MAX(ETH_ZLEN + VNET_HLEN, frame_len);
> for (i = 0; i < elem_cnt; i++) {
> - size_t elem_size = iov_size(elem[i].in_sg, elem[i].in_num);
> + size_t elem_size;
> +
> + elem_size = iov_size(elem[i].in_sg, elem[i].in_num);
> + if (elem_size > len)
> + elem_size = len;
Convenient, but this doesn't really represent 'elem_size' anymore and
it's a bit confusing because we later subtract it from 'len' (at a
first glance, it looks like one might underflow it). What about:
size_t elem_size, fill_size;
elem_size = iov_size(elem[i].in_sg, elem[i].in_num);
fill_size = MIN(len, elem_size);
vu_queue_fill(vdev, vq, &elem[i], fill_size, i);
len -= fill_size;
?
>
> vu_queue_fill(vdev, vq, &elem[i], elem_size, i);
> +
> + len -= elem_size;
> }
Should we now add a debug message or warning here if we happen to have
any residual 'len'? Or it can never happen by design? I'm not quite
sure.
>
> vu_queue_flush(vdev, vq, elem_cnt);
> @@ -270,7 +279,7 @@ int vu_send_single(const struct ctx *c, const void *buf, size_t size)
> if (*c->pcap)
> pcap_iov(in_sg, in_total, VNET_HLEN, size);
>
> - vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, elem_cnt);
> + vu_flush(vdev, vq, elem, elem_cnt, VNET_HLEN + size);
> vu_queue_notify(vdev, vq);
>
> trace("vhost-user sent %zu", total);
> diff --git a/vu_common.h b/vu_common.h
> index 4037ab765b7d..77d1849e6115 100644
> --- a/vu_common.h
> +++ b/vu_common.h
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ int vu_collect(const struct vu_dev *vdev, struct vu_virtq *vq,
> struct iovec *in_sg, size_t max_in_sg, size_t *in_total,
> size_t size, size_t *collected);
> void vu_flush(const struct vu_dev *vdev, struct vu_virtq *vq,
> - struct vu_virtq_element *elem, int elem_cnt);
> + struct vu_virtq_element *elem, int elem_cnt, size_t frame_len);
> void vu_kick_cb(struct vu_dev *vdev, union epoll_ref ref,
> const struct timespec *now);
> int vu_send_single(const struct ctx *c, const void *buf, size_t size);
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-03 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-01 19:18 [PATCH 00/10] vhost-user: Preparatory series for multiple iovec entries per virtqueue element Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 01/10] iov: Introduce iov_memset() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 12:35 ` David Gibson
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 02/10] iov: Add iov_memcopy() to copy data between iovec arrays Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 6:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 03/10] vu_common: Move vnethdr setup into vu_flush() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 6:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-03 10:16 ` Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 04/10] udp_vu: Move virtqueue management from udp_vu_sock_recv() to its caller Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 05/10] udp_vu: Pass iov explicitly to helpers instead of using file-scoped array Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 06/10] checksum: Pass explicit L4 length to checksum functions Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 07/10] pcap: Pass explicit L2 length to pcap_iov() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 6:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-03 10:19 ` Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 08/10] vu_common: Pass explicit frame length to vu_flush() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 6:20 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 09/10] tcp: Pass explicit data length to tcp_fill_headers() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-01 19:18 ` [PATCH 10/10] vhost-user: Centralise Ethernet frame padding in vu_collect() and vu_pad() Laurent Vivier
2026-04-03 6:20 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-03 10:25 ` Laurent Vivier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260403082042.624f7ecb@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).