public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: passt-dev@passt.top, Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] tcp_splice: Remove questionable "optimisation" of pending bytes tracking
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 15:02:12 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260528050213.679685-8-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528050213.679685-1-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

We have a special path that avoids updating conn->pending when the amounts
read and written are equal.  This has a conceptual complexity cost, in
particular, it means that conn->pending[] is not accurate to its normal
meaning for a section of the loop body.

conn->pending[] shares a cacheline with conn->pipe[] and conn->s[], so it's
almost certainly cache-hot.  It's questionable that avoiding the update
of pending even outweighs the extra conditional branch, let alone saves
anything of significance.  Remove it.

This allows us to move the updates to conn->pending closer to the actual
splice() calls, making it easier to reason about its value.  It also lets
us move the conn->pending updates so they can piggy back on existing tests
rather than needing a conditional expression to avoid clobbering it when
splice() returns -1 (EAGAIN).

Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
---
 tcp_splice.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tcp_splice.c b/tcp_splice.c
index 5f412584..565596d3 100644
--- a/tcp_splice.c
+++ b/tcp_splice.c
@@ -500,6 +500,8 @@ static int tcp_splice_forward(struct ctx *c,
 		if (!readlen) {
 			conn_event(conn, FIN_RCVD(fromsidei));
 		} else if (readlen > 0) {
+			conn->pending[fromsidei] += readlen;
+
 			if (readlen >= (long)c->tcp.pipe_size * 90 / 100)
 				more = SPLICE_F_MORE;
 
@@ -524,16 +526,11 @@ static int tcp_splice_forward(struct ctx *c,
 		flow_trace(conn, "%zi from write-side call (passed %zi)",
 			   written, c->tcp.pipe_size);
 
-		/* Most common case: skip updating count of pending bytes */
-		if (readlen > 0 && readlen == written)
-			continue;
-
-		conn->pending[fromsidei] += readlen > 0 ? readlen : 0;
-		conn->pending[fromsidei] -= written > 0 ? written : 0;
-
 		if (written < 0)
 			break;
 
+		conn->pending[fromsidei] -= written;
+
 		if (conn->events & FIN_RCVD(fromsidei) &&
 		    !conn->pending[fromsidei])
 			break;
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28  5:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28  5:02 [PATCH 0/8] splice() forwarding cleanups David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 1/8] tcp_splice: Remove never-invoked SO_RCVLOWAT logic David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 2/8] tcp_splice: Simplify EPOLLRDHUP / eof / FIN handling David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 3/8] tcp_splice: Improve EOF exit condition for the loop David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 4/8] tcp_splice: Remove goto from forwarding loop David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 5/8] tcp_splice: Simplify shutdown(2) handling David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 6/8] tcp_splice: Simplify / correct OUT_WAIT flag handling David Gibson
2026-05-28  5:02 ` David Gibson [this message]
2026-05-28  5:02 ` [PATCH 8/8] tcp_splice: Exit forwarding earlier when stalled read side David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260528050213.679685-8-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).