From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/13] dhcpv6: Fix reply destination to match client's source address
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2026 00:11:42 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260620001142.0d838714@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <agVb9YKJ-yGDP3q3@zatzit>
On Thu, 14 May 2026 15:21:57 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2026 at 08:53:07PM -0400, Jon Maloy wrote:
> > tap_ip6_daddr() selects the reply destination based on our source
> > address type (link-local), so it always returns addr_ll_seen.
>
> I think there might have been more callers of tap_ip6_daddr() in the
> past, which might have made this not true.
>
> > But if
> > the client sent from a global address, we would reply to an address
> > different from what the client is expecting. Since RFC 8415 allows
> > clients to use global addresses for DHCPv6, we now correct this, and
> > always respond to the address the client was using.
>
> Responding to the same address the client used is a good idea in
> general. However, for this specific case, I don't think it will quite
> do what we want. The problem is that we're still always using
> our_tap_ll (link local) as the source address. So if the client used
> a global address we'll send a packet with mismatched address scopes.
> AFAIU that won't usually work.
At least for TCP on Linux that actually works. I haven't tried DHCPv6.
Regardless of that, indeed, it doesn't look like a good idea, and we
shouldn't start doing that if we weren't doing it before.
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 22:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-13 0:53 [PATCH v7 00/13] Introduce multiple addresses and late binding Jon Maloy
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 01/13] dhcpv6: Fix reply destination to match client's source address Jon Maloy
2026-05-14 5:21 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2026-06-19 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 02/13] passt, pasta: Introduce unified multi-address data structures Jon Maloy
2026-05-14 6:30 ` David Gibson
2026-05-14 23:28 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-05-25 9:35 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 03/13] fwd: Unify guest accessibility checks with unified address array Jon Maloy
2026-05-25 9:38 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:09 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 04/13] arp: Check all configured addresses in ARP filtering Jon Maloy
2026-06-19 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 05/13] conf: Allow multiple -a/--address options per address family Jon Maloy
2026-05-25 9:47 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 06/13] netlink, conf: Read all addresses from template interface at startup Jon Maloy
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 07/13] netlink, pasta: refactor function pasta_ns_conf() Jon Maloy
2026-05-26 1:58 ` David Gibson
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 08/13] conf, pasta: Track observed guest IPv4 addresses in unified address array Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 2:46 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:10 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 09/13] conf, pasta: Track observed guest IPv6 " Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 3:40 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 10/13] migrate: Update protocol to v3 for multi-address support Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 3:55 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 11/13] dhcp: Select address for DHCP distribution Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 4:30 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 12/13] dhcpv6: Select addresses for DHCPv6 distribution Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 4:40 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-04-13 0:53 ` [PATCH v7 13/13] ndp: Support advertising multiple prefixes in Router Advertisements Jon Maloy
2026-05-27 4:52 ` David Gibson
2026-06-19 22:11 ` Stefano Brivio
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260620001142.0d838714@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).