From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] isolation, util: Fold close_open_files() into isolate_initial()
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 09:12:23 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715091223.17cdf9f9@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260714092926.2881848-2-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
On Tue, 14 Jul 2026 19:29:21 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> Most functions in util.c are, well, utilities, that are useful in a bunch
> of places. close_open_files(), however, is very specific, it's only called
> from isolate_initial(), and really only can be called from there - it's
Nit: its
> logic encodes a very specific action we want to take at that point.
>
> So, remove it from util.c and fold into isolate_initial().
To me this doesn't actually look like an improvement (well, of course,
otherwise I would have structured commit 09603cab28f9 ("passt, util:
Close any open file that the parent might have leaked") differently)
exactly because close_open_files() is very specific and does exactly
that one thing, contributing to a shorter version of isolate_initial().
Now, I realise that we're pretty far from "fixing"
https://bugs.passt.top/show_bug.cgi?id=31, but still,
isolate_initial() in its current form looks much more digestible than
a version with thirty-three lines added on top. It currently has a
specific role and that's conceptually a separated operation,
regardless of the fact it has a single caller.
On top of that, the function comment to close_open_files() disappears
this way, because it has no natural place anymore. But I think that
was rather useful.
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
By the way, should you respin, you could probably Cc: Ammar as he
volunteered to review this kind of series. I would also suggest Cc'ing
reporters (and marking them as such when doable).
--
Stefano
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-15 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-14 9:29 [PATCH 0/6] Fix bug 215 and some related issues with fd handling David Gibson
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] isolation, util: Fold close_open_files() into isolate_initial() David Gibson
2026-07-15 7:12 ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] isolation, conf: Set c->fd_tap from eary parse of --fd David Gibson
2026-07-15 7:12 ` Stefano Brivio
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] conf: Make conf_tap_fd() operate more like conf_mode() David Gibson
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] isolation: Move --fd descriptor to a number of our choosing David Gibson
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] main: Ensure fds 0-2 are populated David Gibson
2026-07-14 9:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] passt: *Always* close pidfile_fd, not just when daemonizing David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260715091223.17cdf9f9@elisabeth \
--to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).