From: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] tcp: Fixes for issues uncovered by tests with 6.17-rc1 kernels
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:10:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6908b27b-1ab1-44ce-a209-7cfe8ac55290@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250909181655.2990223-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
On 09/09/2025 20:16, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> Starting from Linux kernel commit 1d2fbaad7cd8 ("tcp: stronger
> sk_rcvbuf checks"), window limits are enforced more aggressively with
> a bigger amount of zero-window updates compared to what happened with
> e2142825c120 ("net: tcp: send zero-window ACK when no memory") alone,
> and occasional duplicate ACKs can now be seen also for local transfers
> with default (208 KiB) socket buffer sizes.
>
> Paul reports that, with 6.17-rc1-ish kernels, Podman tests for the
> pasta integration occasionally fail on the "TCP/IPv4 large transfer,
> tap" case.
>
> While playing with a reproducer that seems to be matching those
> failures:
>
> while true; do ./pasta --trace -l /tmp/pasta.log -p /tmp/pasta.pcap --config-net -t 5555 -- socat TCP-LISTEN:5555 OPEN:/tmp/large.rcv,trunc & (sleep 0.3; socat -T2 OPEN:large.bin TCP:88.198.0.164:5555; ); wait; diff large.bin /tmp/large.rcv || break; done
>
> and a kernel including that commit, I hit a few different failures,
> that should be fixed by this series.
>
> Paul tested v1 of this series and found an additional failure
> (transfer timeout), which I could reproduce with a slightly different
> command:
>
> while true; do ./pasta --trace -l /tmp/pasta.log -p /tmp/pasta.pcap --config-net -t 5555 -- socat TCP-LISTEN:5555 EXEC:./write.sh & (sleep 0.3; socat -T2 OPEN:large.bin TCP:88.198.0.164:5555; ); wait; diff large.bin /tmp/large.rcv || break; done
>
> where write.sh is simply:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> cat > /tmp/large.rcv
>
> so that the connection is not half-closed starting from the beginning,
> because socat can't make assumptions about the unidirectional nature
> of the traffic. This should now be fixed as well by the new version of
> patch 3/8.
>
> v4:
> - add patch 8/8
>
> v3:
> - add patch 6/7
> - in 7/7, check dlen <= 1 for keep-alive segments, instead of len <= 1
>
> v2: in 3/6, rewind sequence also if the zero-window update comes in
> the middle of a batch with non-zero window updates
>
> Stefano Brivio (8):
> tcp: FIN flags have to be retransmitted as well
> tcp: Factor sequence rewind for retransmissions into a new function
> tcp: Rewind sequence when guest shrinks window to zero
> tcp: Fix closing logic for half-closed connections
> tcp: Don't try to transmit right after the peer shrank the window to
> zero
> tcp: Cast operands of sequence comparison macros to uint32_t before
> using them
> tcp: Fast re-transmit if half-closed, make TAP_FIN_RCVD path
> consistent
> tcp: Don't send FIN segment to guest yet if we have pending
> unacknowledged data
>
> tcp.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> tcp_buf.c | 5 +-
> tcp_internal.h | 12 +++--
> 3 files changed, 122 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
Reproducer runs for over 14 hours now without failure so looks like we
found all the problems now.
Tested-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
--
Paul Holzinger
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 18:16 [PATCH v4 0/8] tcp: Fixes for issues uncovered by tests with 6.17-rc1 kernels Stefano Brivio
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] tcp: FIN flags have to be retransmitted as well Stefano Brivio
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] tcp: Factor sequence rewind for retransmissions into a new function Stefano Brivio
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] tcp: Rewind sequence when guest shrinks window to zero Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 2:20 ` David Gibson
2025-09-10 6:37 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 7:18 ` David Gibson
2025-09-10 23:48 ` Jon Maloy
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] tcp: Fix closing logic for half-closed connections Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 23:56 ` Jon Maloy
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] tcp: Don't try to transmit right after the peer shrank the window to zero Stefano Brivio
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] tcp: Cast operands of sequence comparison macros to uint32_t before using them Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 2:21 ` David Gibson
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] tcp: Fast re-transmit if half-closed, make TAP_FIN_RCVD path consistent Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 2:27 ` David Gibson
2025-09-10 9:57 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-09-09 18:16 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] tcp: Don't send FIN segment to guest yet if we have pending unacknowledged data Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 2:29 ` David Gibson
2025-09-10 6:37 ` Stefano Brivio
2025-09-10 9:10 ` Paul Holzinger [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6908b27b-1ab1-44ce-a209-7cfe8ac55290@redhat.com \
--to=pholzing@redhat.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).