From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124])
	by passt.top (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AFE5A026D
	for <passt-dev@passt.top>; Wed,  2 Aug 2023 11:51:07 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com;
	s=mimecast20190719; t=1690969867;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=M8tBDORL5j0C53nWMb6ORvmxsWjW34U9keMfB8cfawk=;
	b=LdMJnTXjQ/KvyLGj6XDXMLokSXj/w8wfXLlO2euApfW1bSIMzN1XJ9aABIrJcTpDkvdcih
	E7tDFmtdgws1KZiR96nyK9tbP93x8S8Z4oGv0L+d4LYfDOs3lnSfyRwsAwjMI9QRngkHeh
	5+QZsNXNl4E63+LrhUQC1DjawJRQPM8=
Received: from mail-ed1-f69.google.com (mail-ed1-f69.google.com
 [209.85.208.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS
 (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id
 us-mta-100-x_YI8zYyOWmnjO0ms8jJ-w-1; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 05:51:05 -0400
X-MC-Unique: x_YI8zYyOWmnjO0ms8jJ-w-1
Received: by mail-ed1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-5219ceead33so4719270a12.2
        for <passt-dev@passt.top>; Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:51:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690969864; x=1691574664;
        h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to
         :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id
         :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to;
        bh=M8tBDORL5j0C53nWMb6ORvmxsWjW34U9keMfB8cfawk=;
        b=TcSsWX/YEd+Rs9e9oMK4bF2uIJP5eLlJq/XaV8lH1ddfM1S2mcOBom+lZZsCAyAx1/
         s8OmDRMCGFeYqmqCzby4FWbOG0CeMbxyWr1LkHGz2LqD/98ccF+DbGNY/Mr/47ZUcd8O
         DFg5mvtbz9RXcQdezlD+INQSoCWYD2Ku4GhWolDjkc5i7/K2srbSyXYcBh1u2SjllIvq
         4ztuTAvquBnEzv8vtnDKjrLcuFGqsvyQjw+q5ty2YPIxS4KJCxST4xR4u6V620cckg3S
         zBBqTTS03PjLQxmvhbxiAm4jXuc46kIkwoK5SYWsyACJoSV2SLbHEX1/eYHRzj769xtt
         DUow==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLatR3DkY/R4f+JaHI3Tf9OhQWw4KGfBJUFa8oCUL3VRhXjTx0G/
	8jN89gU8Ea7qD69kCNKq3OuishCXOz/CGLbcdsr+5YLoHyZA105NHv5XNvbyIA8BBIPNy8mno+B
	AOo7dQYYmkBxlSCIrv6nU
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d511:0:b0:522:3849:48d8 with SMTP id y17-20020aa7d511000000b00522384948d8mr4555325edq.9.1690969864559;
        Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEsU5iJC6vk0/u7goMLOcZNqrgVrLGBLAUFIkInwSvtKDqwVmyKMFFsAuUlDd43AOgtKPLEEg==
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d511:0:b0:522:3849:48d8 with SMTP id y17-20020aa7d511000000b00522384948d8mr4555310edq.9.1690969864136;
        Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:51:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.188.25] ([80.243.52.134])
        by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e12-20020a50ec8c000000b0051e0eba608bsm8107017edr.19.2023.08.02.02.51.03
        (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 02 Aug 2023 02:51:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <7ddb3b35-58fe-a376-f839-d9fc6de9ffc5@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 11:51:02 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tap: include errno in error when tap_ns_tun() fails
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
References: <20230801115016.37118-2-pholzing@redhat.com>
 <ZMmzxSUUWh2vOZEV@zatzit>
From: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <ZMmzxSUUWh2vOZEV@zatzit>
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: 4J5N6XDA7S3YUCNPFHTIOCEIKEV5STJM
X-Message-ID-Hash: 4J5N6XDA7S3YUCNPFHTIOCEIKEV5STJM
X-MailFrom: pholzing@redhat.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: passt-dev@passt.top
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development discussion and patches for passt <passt-dev.passt.top>
Archived-At: <https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/7ddb3b35-58fe-a376-f839-d9fc6de9ffc5@redhat.com/>
Archived-At: <https://passt.top/hyperkitty/list/passt-dev@passt.top/message/4J5N6XDA7S3YUCNPFHTIOCEIKEV5STJM/>
List-Archive: <https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/>
List-Archive: <https://passt.top/hyperkitty/list/passt-dev@passt.top/>
List-Help: <mailto:passt-dev-request@passt.top?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:passt-dev-owner@passt.top>
List-Post: <mailto:passt-dev@passt.top>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:passt-dev-join@passt.top>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:passt-dev-leave@passt.top>


On 02/08/2023 03:39, David Gibson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 01:50:17PM +0200, Paul Holzinger wrote:
>> It is important to know why a syscall failed so pasta should include the
>> errno in the error message. This is still not perfect as we do not know
>> which of functions (open, ioctl, if_nametoindex) failed but it should at
>> least include more important context.
> Uh.. we certainly want this, but I don't think this implementation
> will quite do it.
>
>> This change was inspiered by a podman issue[1].
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/19428
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>   tap.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
>> index a6a73d3..c212616 100644
>> --- a/tap.c
>> +++ b/tap.c
>> @@ -1205,7 +1205,8 @@ static void tap_sock_tun_init(struct ctx *c)
>>   
>>   	NS_CALL(tap_ns_tun, c);
> NS_CALL means we're running the function in an ephemeral
> thread/process/thingy..
>
>>   	if (tun_ns_fd == -1)
>> -		die("Failed to open tun socket in namespace");
>> +		die("Failed to open tun socket in namespace: %s",
>> +		    strerror(errno));
> ..which means we can't rely on it actually setting errno in the
> original process.  The ephemeral thread does share memory, but modern
> errno is a weird per-thread thingy, so I'm not entirely sure what will
> happen here, but I'm certainly not confident about it working as we'd
> like.
>
> I'll have a crack at a more robust approach today.

Thanks, I only did a quick test with chmod 600 /dev/net/tun and got the 
expected EACCES so I assumed it worked fine but anyway your series looks 
much better.

>
>
>>   
>>   	pasta_ns_conf(c);
>>