public inbox for passt-dev@passt.top
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>, passt-dev@passt.top
Cc: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] conf: Accept duplicate and conflicting options, the last one wins
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 11:52:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7fb9bd35-9249-4a32-b3d2-bba5f3da475d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620171921.179930-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>


On 20/06/2024 19:19, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> In multiple occasions, especially when passt(1) and pasta(1) are used
> in integrations such as the one with Podman, the ability to override
> earlier options on the command line with later one would have been
> convenient.
>
> Recently, to debug a number of issues happening with Podman, I would
> have liked to ask users to share a debug log by passing --debug as
> additional option, but pasta refuses --quiet (always passed by Podman)
> and --debug at the same time.
>
> On top of this, Podman lets users specify other pasta options in its
> containers.conf(5) file, as well as on the command line.
>
> The options from the configuration files are appended together with
> the ones from the command line, which makes it impossible for users to
> override options from the configuration file, if duplicated options
> are refused, unless Podman takes care of sorting them, which is
> clearly not sustainable.
>
> For --debug and --trace, somebody took care of this on Podman side at:
>    https://github.com/containers/common/pull/2052
>
> but this doesn't fix the issue with other options, and we'll have
> anyway older versions of Podman around, too.
>
> I think there's some value in telling users about duplicated or
> conflicting options, because that might reveal issues in integrations
> or accidental misconfigurations, but by now I'm fairly convinced that
> the downsides outweigh this.
>
> Drop checks about duplicate options and mutually exclusive ones. In
> some cases, we need to also undo a couple of initialisations caused
> by earlier options, but this looks like a simplification, overall.
>
> Notable exception: --stderr still conflicts with --log-file, because
> users might have the expectation that they don't actually conflict.
> But they do conflict in the existing implementation, so it's safer
> to make sure that the users notice that.
>
> Suggested-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>
> Suggested-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>

Tested-by: Paul Holzinger <pholzing@redhat.com>

> ---
> v3:
>    - override --gateway and --dns-forward with the last given option
>      for a given address family, too
assuming you mean --address here as --gateway already worked
>
> v2:
>    - report --log-file and --stderr as conflicting, but accept
>      multiple options if they don't conflict
>    - for --log-file and --pcap, make it clear in the man page that
>      the general principle still applies: only the last one (of each)
>      takes effect
>    - add some more context about Podman and how the list of pasta
>      options is built there, in the commit message
>
>   conf.c  | 146 ++++++++++++++++----------------------------------------
>   passt.1 |  17 +++++++
>   2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 104 deletions(-)
>
-- 
Paul Holzinger


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-21  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20 17:19 [PATCH v3] conf: Accept duplicate and conflicting options, the last one wins Stefano Brivio
2024-06-21  0:53 ` David Gibson
2024-06-21  9:52 ` Paul Holzinger [this message]
2024-06-21  9:55   ` Stefano Brivio

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7fb9bd35-9249-4a32-b3d2-bba5f3da475d@redhat.com \
    --to=pholzing@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
    --cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://passt.top/passt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).