On Tue, Mar 3, 2026 at 2:11 PM Stefano Brivio wrote: > > Peter, unless you see a problem with that, this patch would be > superseded by: > > [PATCH 2/3] fwd, pif: Replace with pif_sock_l4() with pif_listen() > > https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/20260302043135.800803-3-david@gibson.dropbear.id.au/ > > as it avoids the need for this static_assert() altogether. So I would > drop this patch (carrying a Reported-by: tag) in favour of that one. > Sounds good, I'm mostly concerned with having a warning-free clang build. The specific fix doesn't particularly matter. Thanks, Peter