From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: passt.top; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: passt.top; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20230601 header.b=E8UMKohq; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mail-io1-xd2a.google.com (mail-io1-xd2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2a]) by passt.top (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F7AE5A004E for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2024 01:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-xd2a.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-81f861f369aso119837539f.0 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724457101; x=1725061901; darn=passt.top; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=t5HUwo6cdVCM2XIrnsKrCMxJG7bNZEl/+y37rKj1YDw=; b=E8UMKohqVVLZCqsyJba5WsH0g9gDInSJU75SOL3UThxYFbunIIAZqZzJOCkJE8e+vQ mOHukgle5cCZun2rxhPFjFcALt/zmPywbEy6J0z9TSV8dmxmBfqG50GVrdqNx4sqncDx hZjphPkDyHN/ZyWGVyqrj7NG50yMjZVrMSo1CoJm7yhIIzV2ohUmzyfzVYqaqzlo1lJ/ tMlsNwqlKiJA/CTRH2EcOdIiBFqCs9nrWH3w2RwNofokTrzN4ySNQnHnoaOfpuD2pJWA /qSS8ttQNCQNMJ3fgkASsU/0nkpaufz0peDDxbfwW01FdPZWAmvRQFa9Inpj4yuniPjC Myow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724457101; x=1725061901; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t5HUwo6cdVCM2XIrnsKrCMxJG7bNZEl/+y37rKj1YDw=; b=vmLfRj11CHujvtT5KLj68zQwRKGfD5B3QSUtFyLx1wsPhAJHiBz3GeTORuCPs5Gkgp g64y5gaypPWiu7iUYcc/YcbnmzeaKRDJLno7R3I0v3xSnpHp2nBUdqV0sYNAogb8B/iK EdFhpuT6dVzNCDgZ7w2sYxieXwwNFsl4uGNXryRoXRY+of07TYPWZTns5dXTUuyhOBw6 jznRbZPFs6tPpbOSCbcMSQw196TtLnDQRrlRerIWf9IWLKdBZknKd/J43r6oVzIjJFnF jP5z5ldvyTT12unUBjLEbJuqwlPIByBUb6JY9l2QpPesZ/EsSBrK64Mh6SXa7xoSOoP9 3ZgA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWdU0EGFWIi1mgVm7sJvP47yKlhx46NOVGugevFjhXGMZxp/OoSMHLH7+O/Ohrcdx0Xh5rGjHzHkcU=@passt.top X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YywEA/+BYwQ+epKJxgB+fyKAdGSg1XA21DYFp5NsG9qP7mG7q+e dKFFESc3ckv54B0lkE5/3xLDerEVd9ljO9qpcCxSDdslddoz36a5+c9IDHwN9YSElyOXenq1Lp6 LaMpeJGfGDZOFUIeN0pfbgw9MnRg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEOp0Aze6/p+aJG8xuawPHV4qNnF8TwSxUbO1nxw7/XjufAV+sUiSwOhvlkvDUlLkk4nl3yRB7B3Wx+neeKxkw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1d1b:b0:37a:76af:3fca with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-39e3bdee4edmr45457335ab.3.1724457101113; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 16:51:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240823211902.143210-1-jmaloy@redhat.com> <20240823211902.143210-2-jmaloy@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20240823211902.143210-2-jmaloy@redhat.com> From: Jason Xing Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 07:51:05 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tcp: add SO_PEEK_OFF socket option tor TCPv6 To: jmaloy@redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MailFrom: kerneljasonxing@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Hits: nonmember-moderation X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation Message-ID-Hash: F2GEACSTUYCSSHMVARP2YRT7N7QSLRH4 X-Message-ID-Hash: F2GEACSTUYCSSHMVARP2YRT7N7QSLRH4 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 24 Aug 2024 17:54:08 +0200 CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, passt-dev@passt.top, sbrivio@redhat.com, lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, edumazet@google.com X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion and patches for passt Archived-At: Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 5:19=E2=80=AFAM wrote: > > From: Jon Maloy > > When we added the SO_PEEK_OFF socket option to TCP we forgot > to add it even for TCP on IPv6. Even though you said "we forgot", I'm not sure if this patch series belongs to net-next material... > > We do that here. > > Fixes: 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option") > Reviewed-by: David Gibson > Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio > Tested-by: Stefano Brivio > Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy Reviewed-by: Jason Xing You seem to forget to carry Eric's Reviewed-by tag, please see the link :) https://lore.kernel.org/all/CANn89iJmdGdAN1OZEfoM2LNVOewkYDuPXObRoNWhGyn93P= =3D8OQ@mail.gmail.com/ Thanks, Jason