From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@redhat.com>,
kuba@kernel.org, passt-dev@passt.top, sbrivio@redhat.com,
lvivier@redhat.com, dgibson@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 18:46:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANn89iKXOZdT7_ww_Jytm4wMoXAe0=pqX+M_iVpNGaHqe_9o4Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178b9f2dbb3c56fcfef46a97ea395bdd13ebfb59.camel@redhat.com>
On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 6:41 PM Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Note: please send text-only email to netdev.
>
> On Thu, 2024-02-15 at 10:11 -0500, Jon Maloy wrote:
> > I wonder if the following could be acceptable:
> >
> > if (flags & MSG_PEEK)
> > sk_peek_offset_fwd(sk, used);
> > else if (peek_offset > 0)
> > sk_peek_offset_bwd(sk, used);
> >
> > peek_offset is already present in the data cache, and if it has the value
> > zero it means either that that sk->sk_peek_off is unused (-1) or actually is zero.
> > Either way, no rewind is needed in that case.
>
> I agree the above should avoid touching cold cachelines in the
> fastpath, and looks functionally correct to me.
>
> The last word is up to Eric :)
>
An actual patch seems needed.
In the current form, local variable peek_offset is 0 when !MSG_PEEK.
So the "else if (peek_offset > 0)" would always be false.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-15 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-09 22:12 [PATCH v3] tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF jmaloy
2024-02-11 23:17 ` Stefano Brivio
2024-02-13 10:49 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-13 12:24 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-13 13:02 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-13 13:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-13 15:28 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-13 15:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-13 18:39 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-13 19:31 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <20687849-ec5c-9ce5-0a18-cc80f5b64816@redhat.com>
2024-02-15 17:41 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-15 17:46 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2024-02-15 22:24 ` Jon Maloy
2024-02-16 9:14 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-16 9:21 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <6a9f5dec-eb0c-51ef-0911-7345f50e08f0@redhat.com>
2024-02-16 10:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-19 2:02 ` David Gibson
2024-02-13 23:34 ` David Gibson
2024-02-14 3:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2024-02-15 3:16 ` David Gibson
2024-02-15 3:21 ` David Gibson
2024-02-15 9:15 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CANn89iKXOZdT7_ww_Jytm4wMoXAe0=pqX+M_iVpNGaHqe_9o4Q@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dgibson@redhat.com \
--cc=jmaloy@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).