On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 02:08:19AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> David points out that using multiple counters to go over the iov
> array, namely 'i' and 'iov', makes mistakes easier. We can't just use
> 'iov', unless we reserve an element with zero iov_len at the end,
> which isn't really justified.
> 
> Simply use 'i' to iterate over the array.
> 
> Link: https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/Y+mfenvLn3VJ7Dg5@yekko/
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

> ---
>  tap.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index 02da84d..e4c5b5b 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -316,13 +316,13 @@ static void tap_send_frames_pasta(struct ctx *c,
>  {
>  	size_t i;
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < n; i++, iov++) {
> -		if (write(c->fd_tap, (char *)iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len) < 0) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +		if (write(c->fd_tap, (char *)iov[i].iov_base,
> +			  iov[i].iov_len) < 0) {
>  			debug("tap write: %s", strerror(errno));
>  			if (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EWOULDBLOCK)
>  				tap_handler(c, c->fd_tap, EPOLLERR, NULL);
>  			i--;
> -			iov--;
>  		}
>  	}
>  }

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson