From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
Cc: passt-dev@passt.top
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tap: Send frames after the first one in tap_send_frames_pasta()
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 13:24:58 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+mfenvLn3VJ7Dg5@yekko> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230213011211.1198729-1-sbrivio@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2025 bytes --]
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 02:12:11AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> ...instead of repeatedly sending out the first one in iov.
>
> Fixes: e21ee41ac35a ("tcp: Combine two parts of pasta tap send path together")
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
> ---
> I just applied this, to unblock a series by David which was pending
> for way too long. The commit reference in Fixes: refers to a commit
> from said series which I'm pushing out together with this patch.
Huh... how did this ever work even slightly. From that point of view,
Reviewed-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> Posting anyway for reviews.
That said..
>
> tap.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tap.c b/tap.c
> index af9bc15..716d887 100644
> --- a/tap.c
> +++ b/tap.c
> @@ -316,12 +316,13 @@ static void tap_send_frames_pasta(struct ctx *c,
> {
> size_t i;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < n; i++, iov++) {
I quite dislike having multiple "counters" that need to be updated for
each loop iteration (manual strength reduction. It's really easy to
make a mistake in later changes and let the two values get out of sync
- which is exactly what I did with the earlier change that introduced
this bug.
W.r.t. performance, I generally trust the compiler's automatic
strength reduction to have a better idea of whether it will be worth
it or not than my own guess.
> if (write(c->fd_tap, (char *)iov->iov_base, iov->iov_len) < 0) {
So, my *intention* on the older patch was to replace 'iov->' above
with 'iov[i].'
> debug("tap write: %s", strerror(errno));
> if (errno != EAGAIN && errno != EWOULDBLOCK)
> tap_handler(c, c->fd_tap, EPOLLERR, NULL);
> i--;
> + iov--;
> }
> }
> }
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 3:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-13 1:12 [PATCH] tap: Send frames after the first one in tap_send_frames_pasta() Stefano Brivio
2023-02-13 2:24 ` David Gibson [this message]
2023-02-13 10:46 ` Stefano Brivio
2023-02-13 23:39 ` David Gibson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y+mfenvLn3VJ7Dg5@yekko \
--to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=passt-dev@passt.top \
--cc=sbrivio@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://passt.top/passt
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for IMAP folder(s).