On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 09:16:58PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Aug 2022 14:58:39 +1000
> David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > When not given an existing PID or network namspace to attach to, pasta
> > spawns a shell.  Most commands which can spawn a shell in an altered
> > environment can also run other commands in that same environment, which can
> > be useful in automation.
> > 
> > Allow pasta to do the same thing; it can be given an arbitrary command to
> > run in the network and user namespace which pasta creates.  If neither a
> > command nor an existing PID or netns to attach to is given, continue to
> > spawn a default shell, as before.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david(a)gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  conf.c  | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> >  passt.1 | 14 +++++++++-----
> >  pasta.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  pasta.h |  2 +-
> >  4 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/conf.c b/conf.c
> > index 2a18124..162c2dd 100644
> > --- a/conf.c
> > +++ b/conf.c
> > @@ -550,7 +550,8 @@ static int conf_ns_pid(char *userns, char *netns, const char *arg)
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> >  
> > -	return -EINVAL;
> > +	/* Not a PID, later code will treat as a command */
> > +	return 0;
> >  }
> >  
> >  /**
> > @@ -1480,14 +1481,18 @@ void conf(struct ctx *c, int argc, char **argv)
> >  
> >  	check_root(c);
> >  
> > -	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA && optind + 1 == argc) {
> > -		ret = conf_ns_pid(userns, netns, argv[optind]);
> > -		if (ret < 0)
> > +	if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA) {
> > +		if (*netns && optind != argc) {
> > +			err("Both --netns and PID or command given");
> >  			usage(argv[0]);
> > -	} else if (c->mode == MODE_PASTA && *userns
> > -		   && !*netns && optind == argc) {
> > -		err("--userns requires --netns or PID");
> > -		usage(argv[0]);
> > +		} else if (optind + 1 == argc) {
> > +			ret = conf_ns_pid(userns, netns, argv[optind]);
> > +			if (ret < 0)
> > +				usage(argv[0]);
> > +		} else if (*userns && !*netns && optind == argc) {
> > +			err("--userns requires --netns or PID");
> > +			usage(argv[0]);
> > +		}
> >  	} else if (optind != argc) {
> >  		usage(argv[0]);
> >  	}
> >
> > [...]
> 
> I haven't really looked into this yet, but I guess we should now
> handle getopts return codes a bit differently, because this works:
> 
>   $ ./pasta --config-net -- sh -c 'sleep 1; ip li sh'
>   1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>       link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
>   2: enp9s0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65520 qdisc pfifo_fast state UNKNOWN mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000
>       link/ether aa:3e:39:5f:c6:15 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
> 
> while this doesn't:
> 
>   $ ./pasta --config-net sh -c 'sleep 1; ip li sh'
>   ./pasta: invalid option -- 'c'
>   [...]
> 
> despite the fact that there's no ambiguity.

You mean because pasta itself doesn't have a -c option?  Attempting to
account for that sounds like a bad idea.  Requiring -- when the
command given has options of its own that aren't supposed to go to the
wrapper is pretty common for these sorts of tools.  Basically the
trade-off is that you either need to require that, or you have to
require that all non-option arguments of the wrapper come last (old
style POSIXish command line parsing, as opposed to GNUish
conventions).  The latter is usually more awkward than the former.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson