On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:47:34PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 16:43:39 +0100 > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 02, 2022 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > > fedora-review says: > > > > > > Note: Directories without known owners: > > > /usr/share/selinux/packages/passt, /usr/share/doc/passt, > > > /usr/share/selinux, /usr/share/selinux/packages > > > > > > and selinux-policy owns those two last ones. > > > > > > Reported-by: Daniel P. Berrangé > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio > > > --- > > > contrib/fedora/passt.spec | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/contrib/fedora/passt.spec b/contrib/fedora/passt.spec > > > index 1e328e2..f9fd0ab 100644 > > > --- a/contrib/fedora/passt.spec > > > +++ b/contrib/fedora/passt.spec > > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ requiring any capabilities or privileges. > > > %package selinux > > > BuildArch: noarch > > > Summary: SELinux support for passt and pasta > > > -Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > > +Requires: selinux-policy, %{name} = %{version}-%{release} > > > > It isn't a requirement, but my preference would be separate Requires > > line for each dep, as it makes the spec more readable. > > > > > Requires(post): policycoreutils, %{name} > > > Requires(preun): policycoreutils, %{name} > > ...for consistency, should I then change these two (post, preun) as > well? It starts looking a bit "long" though. Or are those special > somehow? I would split them yes. Length isn't really a concern - if anything, the more packages you have in Requires, the more important it is to split them each on one line, and even alphabetically sort them (though I'd keep %{name} first if sorting as its special) With regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|