On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 01:04:21AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote: > We want to add support for option 80 (Rapid Commit, RFC 4039), whose > length is 0. > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Brivio > --- > dhcp.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------- > 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/dhcp.c b/dhcp.c > index a06f143..2fe4a4d 100644 > --- a/dhcp.c > +++ b/dhcp.c > @@ -36,9 +36,9 @@ > /** > * struct opt - DHCP option > * @sent: Convenience flag, set while filling replies > - * @slen: Length of option defined for server > + * @slen: Length of option defined for server, -1 if not going to be sent > * @s: Option payload from server > - * @clen: Length of option received from client > + * @clen: Length of option received from client, -1 if not received > * @c: Option payload from client > */ > struct opt { > @@ -154,17 +154,17 @@ static int fill(struct msg *m) > * option 53 at the beginning of the list. > * Put it there explicitly, unless requested via option 55. > */ > - if (!memchr(opts[55].c, 53, opts[55].clen)) > + if (opts[55].clen > 0 && !memchr(opts[55].c, 53, opts[55].clen)) > fill_one(m, 53, &offset); > > for (i = 0; i < opts[55].clen; i++) { > o = opts[55].c[i]; > - if (opts[o].slen) > + if (opts[o].slen != -1) > fill_one(m, o, &offset); > } > > for (o = 0; o < 255; o++) { > - if (opts[o].slen && !opts[o].sent) > + if (opts[o].slen != -1 && !opts[o].sent) > fill_one(m, o, &offset); > } > > @@ -264,6 +264,9 @@ static void opt_set_dns_search(const struct ctx *c, size_t max_len) > ".\xc0"); > } > } > + > + if (!opts[119].slen) > + opts[119].slen = -1; > } > > /** > @@ -313,6 +316,13 @@ int dhcp(const struct ctx *c, const struct pool *p) > > offset += offsetof(struct msg, o); > > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(opts); i++) { > + if (!opts[i].slen) > + opts[i].slen = -1; > + > + opts[i].clen = -1; > + } Could this move to dhcp_init()? I think there you wouldn't need test and could unconditionally initialize all the lengths to -1 before initializing the options we actually use. > while (opt_off + 2 < opt_len) { > const uint8_t *olen, *val; > uint8_t *type; > @@ -334,8 +344,9 @@ int dhcp(const struct ctx *c, const struct pool *p) > if (opts[53].c[0] == DHCPDISCOVER) { > info("DHCP: offer to discover"); > opts[53].s[0] = DHCPOFFER; > - } else if (opts[53].c[0] == DHCPREQUEST || !opts[53].clen) { > - info("%s: ack to request", opts[53].clen ? "DHCP" : "BOOTP"); > + } else if (opts[53].c[0] == DHCPREQUEST || opts[53].clen <= 0) { > + info("%s: ack to request", > + (opts[53].clen <= 0) ? "DHCP" : "BOOTP"); Should this be <= 0, or < 0? i.e. Wouldn't even an empty option 53 indicate we're dealing with DHCP rather than BOOTP? > opts[53].s[0] = DHCPACK; > } else { > return -1; > @@ -374,6 +385,8 @@ int dhcp(const struct ctx *c, const struct pool *p) > ((struct in_addr *)opts[6].s)[i] = c->ip4.dns[i]; > opts[6].slen += sizeof(uint32_t); > } > + if (!opts[6].slen) > + opts[6].slen = -1; > > if (!c->no_dhcp_dns_search) > opt_set_dns_search(c, sizeof(m->o)); -- David Gibson (he or they) | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you, not the other way | around. http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson