On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 06:46:25AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 19:55:11 +1100
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 09:46:19AM +0100, Stefano Brivio wrote:
> > > On Thu, 30 Jan 2025 19:33:25 +1100
> > > David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Here are some things that I think improve the draft migration logic.
> > > > This is based on both the draft migration series (v2) and my
> > > > epoll_del() series.
> > > > 
> > > > Feel free to fold into the existing patches if that seems sensible.  
> > > 
> > > Sure, let me post a v3 with these included.
> > > 
> > > Do you prefer to keep all the patches as they are or should I merge 2/5
> > > and 3/5 with the patches in my current series?  
> > 
> > Whichever you prefer.  And 1/5 probably _should_ be folded in.
> 
> So, yeah, I have a merged series ready, but I'm trying to solve the
> concrete problem I'm facing before posting it.
> 
> Actually, merging clean-ups with no _intended_ impact on functionality,
> while trying to do this, isn't terribly helpful, but it didn't take
> that long.

So, the cleanups aren't purely cleanups for the sake of cleanups:
they're things I think I need in preparation for the more compact flow
table representation stuff.

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson