On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:14:34PM +0100, Enrique Llorente wrote:
> The option 255 (end of options) do not need the length byte, this change
> remove that allowing to have one extra byte at other dynamic options.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Enrique Llorente <ellorent@redhat.com>

Thanks, change is good.  However, could you also update the comment on
OPT_MAX's definition that appears to have the same error in it.

> ---
>  dhcp.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/dhcp.c b/dhcp.c
> index 401cb5b..3aef13f 100644
> --- a/dhcp.c
> +++ b/dhcp.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ struct msg {
>  	uint8_t sname[64];
>  	uint8_t file[128];
>  	uint32_t magic;
> -	uint8_t o[OPT_MAX + 2 /* End option and its length */ ];
> +	uint8_t o[OPT_MAX + 1 /* End option */ ];
>  } __attribute__((__packed__));
>  
>  /**
> @@ -194,7 +194,6 @@ static int fill(struct msg *m)
>  	}
>  
>  	m->o[offset++] = 255;
> -	m->o[offset++] = 0;
>  
>  	if (offset < OPT_MIN) {
>  		memset(&m->o[offset], 0, OPT_MIN - offset);

-- 
David Gibson (he or they)	| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you, not the other way
				| around.
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson